RE: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-21 Thread Chris Martin
True -Original Message- From: "Justin Mclean" Sent: ‎8/‎21/‎2014 1:12 AM To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3 Hi, > Can we at least remove the stuff that we know does not work? It should be > straightforw

RE: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-21 Thread Chris Martin
flex.apache.org" Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3 Can we at least remove the stuff that we know does not work? It should be straightforward to just remove it from explorer.xml. Thanks, Om On Aug 20, 2014 9:00 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Can we at least remove the stuff that we know does not work? It should be > straightforward to just remove it from explorer.xml. We would need to cut a new RC to do that as the signatures would change if we made changes to the XML file. It not really on to deploy a file different to wha

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Can we at least remove the stuff that we know does not work? It should be straightforward to just remove it from explorer.xml. Thanks, Om On Aug 20, 2014 9:00 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > On 8/20/14 7:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > > >> MX controls deal with that, but I don't think Spark

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 8/20/14 7:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> MX controls deal with that, but I don't think Spark >> controls do. >So that would be a bug then? IMO, yes, but I think last time I looked into it, the load is done by OSMF which we can't change. They probably wouldn't want to use our mx.utils.Lo

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The problem with VideoPlayer is that it is looking for the mp4 in the > wrong place. Well, it is the right place when run on its own, but when a > SWF is loaded by another SWF, relative paths are fixed up against the > first SWF loaded. Thanks for finding the issue. At least we can fix that

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Alex Harui
I put TDF on localhost. The OSMFExample still doesn't show video, and VideoPlayer still doesn't work. The problem with VideoPlayer is that it is looking for the mp4 in the wrong place. Well, it is the right place when run on its own, but when a SWF is loaded by another SWF, relative paths are fi

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread Chris Martin
Looks like VideoDisplayExample is missing from the compile-spark target. That would explain why we'd get a "swf not loaded" image. For me the OSMFExample (second "VideoDisplay" link in the tree) plays sound, but the vid is black. I can seek through the video just fine. I just get audio. The las

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> > One issue that I would like to see fixed: >> > Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has >> two >> > VideoDisplay components.

Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex Release Candidate 3

2014-08-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > One issue that I would like to see fixed: > > Spark Framework Components > Visual Components > General Controls has two > > VideoDisplay components. The first one is broken and does not work. > > Any idea what the issue may be? >