dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.0 RC2
Hi,
> We should at least put up web version on our flex.apache.org site.
At what URL do we want this to live?
Anyone with a bit more experience of the CMS system know how we can set this up
so it doesn't get the header footer etc etc
Thanks,
Justin
+1
> We should at least put up web version on our flex.apache.org site.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 8:28 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] TourDeFlex 1.0
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We should at least put up web version on our flex.apache.org site.
> At what URL do we want this to live?
>
> Anyone with a bit more experience of the CMS system know how we can set
> this up so it doesn't get the header footer etc
Hi,
> We should at least put up web version on our flex.apache.org site.
At what URL do we want this to live?
Anyone with a bit more experience of the CMS system know how we can set this up
so it doesn't get the header footer etc etc
Thanks,
Justin
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I looked over the README, RELEASE_NOTES, LICENSE and NOTICE and ran Rat.
> > Everything looks ok in that area.
> Thanks for checking.
>
> > 1) Should there be convenience binaries?
> Given they are rather large (300Mb+) and easy en
Hi,
> I looked over the README, RELEASE_NOTES, LICENSE and NOTICE and ran Rat.
> Everything looks ok in that area.
Thanks for checking.
> 1) Should there be convenience binaries?
Given they are rather large (300Mb+) and easy enough to build (only the
location of the Flex SDK is required) I don't
I looked over the README, RELEASE_NOTES, LICENSE and NOTICE and ran Rat.
Everything looks ok in that area.
The only things I wondered about are:
1) Should there be convenience binaries?
2) Should we have -src as part of the package name?
Once the build issues get sorted out, it should be good to
Hi,
Moving from vote thread:
> I don't know if it's 'allowed' but I'd remove the drop shadows on the
>boxes before release, it'll look a lot better.
Flat design is now trendy. There's certainly some styling that need to be done
to the application overall, hopefully someone can help out here.
>
Hi,
Please place all discussion here and not in the vote thread.
Thanks,
Justin
