Alex,
I just tried Maven release and everything looks good. I did clean my local
Maven repo and build some small project with 0.8.0 release.
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISC
I tried the installer.xml via ant. It was failing.
I was downloading the AIR sdk via the browser when the vote results were
announced.
In any case, I will give all this a spin when I get release of the npm
package out.
Thanks,
Om
On Jun 26, 2017 8:25 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I updated the MD5
Hi Alex,
I will check Maven artifacts in couple of hours and let you know.
Finally!
Thank you and looking forward to the announcements :),
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Dis
I updated the MD5 for Air Beta 25 last night after seeing Om's email.
Hopefully that fixes it for him.
I just "released" the Maven artifacts. Can someone verify that it did the
right thing?
Thanks to everyone who helped get the release out. Especially Piotr, who
did a lot of the work on the Mav
Hi Om,
I saw your post in VOTE thread. Did you tried to download artifacts by
installer yes ? This is where you had the problems ?
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Dis
Hi Alex,
What's the plan with release ? I think we have enough votes do we wait still
on others ?
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0-8-0-RC2
HI,
Alternately you can compile the source release using maven and install locally
i.e. mvn clean install
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Om,
I think you need this one [1], but you have to also prepare for you settings
file [2] with active profile "staged-artifacts".
I was testing those artifacts in following way:
1) Removed all folder 0.8.0 from ".m2\repository\org\apache\flex\flexjs\"
2) Try to compile simple app or complex [
I am trying to test the release artifacts, but there is no mention of maven
build in the README. Are there instructions somewhere?
Thanks,
Om
On Jun 23, 2017 12:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> I wrote this up recently [1]. It would be great if you can give it a try.
> Let me know if you have qu
I wrote this up recently [1]. It would be great if you can give it a try.
Let me know if you have questions.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/ApacheFlexBuild+CI+Server+
Maintenance
-Alex
On 6/22/17, 11:39 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>How can I restart this server ? This
Alex,
How can I restart this server ? This app slave.jar cannot connect with the
server.
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0-8-0-RC2-tp62498
Hi,
I just tested the new RC2 and I’m see a couple of issues with our application.
1) initialisation order seem to have changed for mxml components and we’re
getting some things undefined where previously they were defined.
2) a couple layouts are now broken
I’m going to assume this are easily f
It just needs restarting.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: piotrz
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:04:49 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC2
Alex,
What actually is wrong wit
Alex,
What actually is wrong with this jenkins ? Did you stop it forever ?
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0-8-0-RC2-tp62498p62540.html
Sent from t
Hi Justin,
Sorry I did miss your questions and concerns. If it is staged as you mention
I will try to build typedefs using those artifacts from your link today
evening my time.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-developme
Hi
>> Since we didn't staged typedefs (in the next release we should) you have to
>> first build Falcon and typedefs.
>
> This is likely going to cause a number of issues as nor everyone will compile
> typedefs from source and would expect it to deployed.
>
> It still still be possible to stage
Hi,
I’m also seeing encoding difference between RC1 and RC2 in .as files [1][2][3]
I think it may only be in comments - look to be “smart" quotes.
Thanks,
Justin
1. frameworks/projects/Language/src/main/flex/QName.as
2. frameworks/projects/XML/src/main/flex/XML.as
3. frameworks/projects/XML/src
Hi,
> Since we didn't staged typedefs (in the next release we should) you have to
> first build Falcon and typedefs.
This is likely going to cause a number of issues as nor everyone will compile
typedefs from source and would expect it to deployed.
It still still be possible to stage it from th
Hi,
>> I noticed the MIT license says: 2013-2016. Shouldn't it be 2013-2017?
>>
>> The MIT License (MIT)
>> Copyright (c) 2013-2016 Designmodo
It matters a small amount but is not an issue. The question to ask is has any
changes been made to the code we bundle by Designmodo in 2017. If not the
It is important to know that in order to check Maven artifacts you need to in
your "settings-template.xml" set [1] and run Maven build with this profile.
Since we didn't staged typedefs (in the next release we should) you have to
first build Falcon and typedefs.
[1] https://paste.apache.org/0Bj7
Legal-discuss seems to say it doesn't matter. See:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201610.mbox/%3c
39b454e0-67a6-45ee-844d-b36f17d49...@gbiv.com%3e
On 6/20/17, 11:18 PM, "yishayw" wrote:
>I noticed the MIT license says: 2013-2016. Shouldn't it be 2013-2017?
>
>The M
I noticed the MIT license says: 2013-2016. Shouldn't it be 2013-2017?
The MIT License (MIT)
Copyright (c) 2013-2016 Designmodo
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0-8-0-RC2-tp62498p62512.html
Sent from the
Hi Alex,
Ahh yes! So I did examined wrong sources in case of Falcon. I'm progressing
with checking RC. :)
Thanks,
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Discuss-Release-Apache-FlexJS-0
Hi Piotr,
What command did you run? I noticed that in the VOTE email the -Drc=2
option is on the next line, but that is required to pull the actual RC2
instead of the release branch nightly.
Maybe post the console log if you have questions. The CI server should
not be involved at all with the e
Hi Alex,
There is a problem with Approve script. I run it for FlexJS and everything
went fine. I got proper build. I decided to go into downloaded folder:
"apache-flex-flexjs-0.8.0-src" and run Maven build - It started to build
with 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT.
We should do rebuild [1], cause we are examining
This is the discussion thread.
Changes in this RC include:
Maven artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflex-1020
Thanks goes to Piotr as well as Josh and Chris for helping get the Maven
artifacts in order.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
26 matches
Mail list logo
