Sorry for the disturbance. The problem was that the falcon version did not
match the asjs version and the new css interface was not being used…
I’m having another issue with the latest version of falcon, but that will be a
separate thread…
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Scratch t
Scratch that. I used the falcon develop branch for compiling. It looks like
Alex just changed something there related to CSS files. I’m trying to compile
using an older version of the code to see what happens.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Nope. It does not look like the CSS file
Nope. It does not look like the CSS files are output correctly in the 0.7.0
release… :-(
I think this is bad enough to require an RC2 or a really quick hotfix release.
On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Harbs wrote:
> Big problem:
>
> I think I might have just discovered a problem with the latest F
Big problem:
I think I might have just discovered a problem with the latest Falcon. I’m not
getting any css files when I compile.
I tested using the refactor-sprite branch. I’ll test on the main branch, but
I’m pretty sure it’s a Falcon problem…
:-(
On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Alex Harui wro
Bits are up on dist. The Installer won't be updated until we feel good
about mirror propagation. I will check in about 7 hours.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/7/16, 2:59 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
wrote:
>Awesome! Congrats on the release.
>
>Sorry, I couldn't vote on the re
Awesome! Congrats on the release.
Sorry, I couldn't vote on the release artifacts. Things were failing for
me in different ways on each try.
Once the bits are up on dist and propagated on the mirrors, I will update
the npm package and push it.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Alex H
On 9/7/16, 2:49 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>
>bombs away ... :-)
>
>
>So this is the first time we released maven artifacts of a complete Flex
>SDK ... I'll grab a beer on that after my talk tomorrow.
Have a beer for me. I'm going to try to push the other artifacts now. I
am ho
Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
Chris,
I think there are enough +1 votes that you can deploy the Maven artifacts
at your convenience. I am going to wait a bit to see if Harbs has time to
work through his build issues before posting results and the Ant artifacts.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9
Chris,
I think there are enough +1 votes that you can deploy the Maven artifacts
at your convenience. I am going to wait a bit to see if Harbs has time to
work through his build issues before posting results and the Ant artifacts.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/5/16, 11:52 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>I look
>
>
>Must be something else.
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>Von: Harbs
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 12:36:28
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
>
>The createjs typedef build is failing, and I’m clueless
> export AIR_HOME=/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/
frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler
It's probably a good idea to point to the version of the AIR SDK without a
compiler. You don't want conflicts with our compiler.
- Josh
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Harbs wrote:
> I’m not having success with the
; Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 12:03:30
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
>
> I’m not having success with the Falcon approval script, but it did work using
> the FlexJS approval script. FWIW, here are the variables
t; An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
>
> I’m not having success with the Falcon approval script, but it did work using
> the FlexJS approval script. FWIW, here are the variables that I’m setting for
> the approval scripts:
essing.
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 12:03:30
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
I’m not having success with the Falcon approval script, but it did work using
the FlexJS approval script.
I’m not having success with the Falcon approval script, but it did work using
the FlexJS approval script. FWIW, here are the variables that I’m setting for
the approval scripts:
export AIR_HOME=/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/frameworks/AIRSDK_Compiler
export
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/harbs/Do
On 9/6/16, 8:11 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think
>>there
>> will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that
>> folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future
>> releases of Crea
Hi,
> The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think there
> will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that
> folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future
> releases of CreateJS itself.
That’s not the issue here. I agree that p
s-release zip which is a zipped up version of the module
>itself. This should be buildable if all the dependencies are available.
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>
>Von: Alex Harui
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 08:52:31
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>
Well, this debate is in the archives, but I will attempt to explain again:
The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think there
will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that
folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future
release
>>
>> Von: Harbs
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 11:13:48
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
>>
>> I’m getting the following error. Suggestions?
&g
stag, 6. September 2016 11:13:48
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
>
> I’m getting the following error. Suggestions?
>
> download_tween:
> Getting: https://github.com/CreateJS/TweenJS/archive/0.6.2.zip
> To:
>
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 11:13:48
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
I’m getting the following error. Suggestions?
download_tween:
Getting: https://github.com/CreateJS/TweenJS/archive/0.6.2.zip
To:
/Users/harbs
I’m getting the following error. Suggestions?
download_tween:
Getting: https://github.com/CreateJS/TweenJS/archive/0.6.2.zip
To:
/Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.7.0-src/flex-typedefs/createjs/target/downloads/tween-0.6.2.zip
https://github.com/CreateJS/Tween
Hi,
> I don't quite understand, why we have to remove the old header anyway ...
> shouldn't it be possible to add the Apache header (would sort of be both in
> there) ... the Patch file itself should have an Apache Header, I think. But
> the resulting file shouldn't have the old header removed.
ldn't have the old header removed.
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 09:17:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
Hi,
> I looked over the artifacts and noticed tha
Hi,
> I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin
> sources are not in the source package. However, it appears the
> flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in the source.jar for flexjs-maven-plugin,
> so I think we can just consider that source.jar as one of the artefacts.
You
Hi,
> For now I would just claim that the Ant release isn't intended on being built
> with Maven untill we have the first binaries for jburg-types and build-tools
> out the door.
Fair enough as long as work works that enough to compile the source package and
vote.
Thanks,
Justin
: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 08:52:31
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin
sources are not in the source package. However, it appears the
flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in
I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin
sources are not in the source package. However, it appears the
flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in the source.jar for flexjs-maven-plugin,
so I think we can just consider that source.jar as one of the artifacts.
BTW, I am thinkin
ght that by using an older version, the build will also work for older
Flash versions. As we aren't using features of new versions (not that I know
of), I thought this is ok.
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 01:26:01
An: dev@
Hi,
> It it possible to test the maven build with this release?
Answering part of my own question - changing the pom file to have this, means
it get a little further:
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
But then complains about this:
Failure to find com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
Hi,
It it possible to test the maven build with this release?
When running mvn I get this error:
Failure to find org.apache.flex.flexjs.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.0.0
in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
Which makes sense as it’s not released yet.
Thanks,
Jus
Hi,
I’ve brought this up before and still concerned about the tweenjs [1] and
easels [2] patch files. These patch files are removing the copyright and MIT
license headers from 3rd party files. AFAIKS this would not be in line with ASF
policy on 3rd party headers. See points 1 and 2 of [3].
Tha
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Alex Harui
34 matches
Mail list logo
