In theory, no users would use binaries, even the convenience installer.
Everyone would use source packages and build themselves. I see emails where
new projects are being instructed not to provide binaries. In practice for
Flex, that isn't even close to reality, but nobody has bothered to try
Why would we need to be emphasizing the source in the name of the
convenience installer, as compared to in the name of the source code
download? I would think the installer names should look as "pro" as
possible.
Uninstalling the previous version and then installing worked. If that is
the expected
The name is a standard pattern at Apache. I don't think it is a requirement,
but we are supposed to be emphasizing the "source".
Try uninstalling whatever version you have and re-installing.
HTH,
-Alex
On 7/17/18, 12:25 PM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote:
Why does the installer file name includ
Why does the installer file name include "bin"? That does not seem ideal.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Wetmore wrote:
> When I try to install the installer, I get a message that there is
> something wrong with the certificate. Has anyone else installed is
> successfully?
>
> On Mon, J
When I try to install the installer, I get a message that there is
something wrong with the certificate. Has anyone else installed is
successfully?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex
> S
