On 11/28/16, 11:11 PM, "Pan Li" wrote:
>
>Could some one guide me to get working binary or source code of 0.8?
Can you build and run the DataBindingExample in examples/flexjs?
-Alex
Hi
we would like to try 0.8 for our application, but we could not get the last
git code building correct, the produced SDK can build FlexJS application
but the app fail with runtime javascript error.
I checked nightly builds at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-asjs/
I download
On 11/28/16, 10:07 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Hi Om, Carlos,
>
>I created yesterday bead DeletableChip. In DeletableChip there is a place
>for icon on the right sigh of the Chip. [1] I'm wondering how actually it
>should be implemented.
>
>Should I add to DeletableChip property for example image="can
‘none’ is the default value of border-style, so it shouldn’t affect rendering.
The problem was in CSSContainerUtils.getBorderMetrics():
var borderStyle:Object = ValuesManager.valuesImpl.getValue(object,
"border-style");
borderStyle was evaluated in JS to undefined and the condition that f
Example has been eaten by list: -> https://paste.apache.org/sasN
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-MDL-Add-icon-to-DeletableChip-tp56766p56767.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development ma
Hi Om, Carlos,
I created yesterday bead DeletableChip. In DeletableChip there is a place
for icon on the right sigh of the Chip. [1] I'm wondering how actually it
should be implemented.
Should I add to DeletableChip property for example image="cancel" which
takes name of the image ?
/cancel/
I
Thanks Carlos. It make sense the way you think. Let's live it as is.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Naming-conventions-for-Beads-tp56755p56765.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Dev
Yeah, js.swc exposes APIs that may not work in all browsers. Be careful
what you use when you go low-level.
At the same time, if someone isn't interested in IE9 at all, it wouldn't be
a very good experience for them if we completely blocked those low-level
APIs that are fully supported on more mod
Are you sure this did not impact any examples?
-Alex
On 11/28/16, 6:45 AM, "yish...@apache.org" wrote:
>Repository: flex-asjs
>Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/develop 1ae995db3 -> d159d7ed1
>
>
>FLEX-35187 - explicitly set default border to none, so viewports can
>ignore non-existent borders.
>
On 11/28/16, 1:14 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>I just tried to compile a line with classList and seems we have the API in
>flexjs. Don't try it...already, so If we have the API and compiles, it
>should work, so we are supporting it, right?
I think you are re
+1 for leaving the setter private.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:01 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Bindable] and private setters (was Re: [Falcon])
On 11/22/16, 9:26 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>If they
This is a form of lazy loading. We’re not baking in any new dependencies that
weren’t there before. If you look in ContainerView.performLayout(), for
example, you’ll see it’s doing the same thing.
Some beads rely on other beads to already be loaded, this code essentially
makes sure that the d
An Accordion component needs a layout or it will not work.
On Nov 28, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote:
> Hi Yishay,
>
> This layout property is not only returning something but also adding - It
> doesn't look good. Is there any other option ?
>
> 2016-11-28 9:58 GMT+01:00 :
> Reposito
Hi Yishay,
This layout property is not only returning something but also adding - It
doesn't look good. Is there any other option ?
2016-11-28 9:58 GMT+01:00 :
> Repository: flex-asjs
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/develop ce807561d -> 1ae995db3
>
>
> Don't let order of bead addition confuse
I just tried to compile a line with classList and seems we have the API in
flexjs. Don't try it...already, so If we have the API and compiles, it
should work, so we are supporting it, right?
2016-11-27 18:32 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala :
> Looks like this polyfill could be useful.
>
> https://g
Hi Piotrz,
when I started making some beads, and test its use, I notice that names was
very verbose and redundant. Since we use to put beads inside package beads
(i.e: "beads/SomeBead.as".
For that reason I prefer the simple name.
People using it, will discover the bead, in its package, or in an
16 matches
Mail list logo
