I used with my custom custom for AMFJS integration and it
works ok. check below code:
public class AMFJS
{
/**
*
*
*
*/
public function AMFJS()
Good to know.
I’ll probably be trying it in the next few days.
On Oct 31, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/16, 8:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> is used in classes which subclass Application. How would it
>> work for classes which might be used in multiple locations in an app?
On 10/31/16, 8:36 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>Well I had another look at the original code. Seems I have to include
>that commented out line again as this copies the content of closure-lib
>into the debug-js directory. This should only be executed in Ant builds.
I would think the
Hi Alex,
Well I had another look at the original code. Seems I have to include that
commented out line again as this copies the content of closure-lib into the
debug-js directory. This should only be executed in Ant builds.
I’ll look into this ... currently I’m finishing up the distribution (gen
On 10/31/16, 8:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
> is used in classes which subclass Application. How would it
>work for classes which might be used in multiple locations in an app?
works for any class, not just Application.
>
>For example, if I want to implement a BinaryData.inflate() (in a subclass
>o
On 10/31/16, 8:01 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>thanks for your responses. Well I made it check the closureLib as I
>wanted to allow users to specify that if they wanted to monkey-patch
>stuff.
In looking into the Ant scripts, closure-lib is being set. Did setting
closureLib resul
is used in classes which subclass Application. How would it work
for classes which might be used in multiple locations in an app?
For example, if I want to implement a BinaryData.inflate() (in a subclass or
utility class) how could I use and be sure it will be injected
once and only once?
On
Hi Alex,
thanks for your responses. Well I made it check the closureLib as I wanted to
allow users to specify that if they wanted to monkey-patch stuff.
Well for now I removed the VF2JS stuff in my branch. I think I remember us
discussing that and that consensus was to remove the code.
At leas
On 10/31/16, 5:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am currently digging through the compiler trying to understand it a
>little better.
>I noticed a lot of places that need some cleaning up. And I noticed a lot
>of obviously dead code. I do have some questions and I will continue to
>ask t
On 10/31/16, 1:14 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>My optimization should have an effect if the closureLib is NOT explicitly
>set and the file „goog/deps.js“ is found on the compilers classpath. This
>is probably only the case for Maven builds.
I think closureLib is sometimes set for me. Any rea
On 10/30/16, 7:24 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>I’m not sure whether to do an ActionScript port of one of these
>libraries, or just link to the original JS library. The advantage of
>linking is that it can be linked to a CDN to make downloads smaller.
>i.e.[4]
>
>Is there a standardized way of integrat
Hi,
I am currently digging through the compiler trying to understand it a little
better.
I noticed a lot of places that need some cleaning up. And I noticed a lot of
obviously dead code. I do have some questions and I will continue to ask them
while I encounter them.
Currently I have these:
-
Well as a good starting point I would like to point you to the training video
Justin and I did:
https://vimeo.com/167857327/da3e3239bc
I guess it should be beneficial to understand how Maven thinks a little, no
matter if you are planning on working on the build itself or if you are just
using i
My optimization should have an effect if the closureLib is NOT explicitly set
and the file „goog/deps.js“ is found on the compilers classpath. This is
probably only the case for Maven builds.
I am currently working on cleaning up the MXMLFlexJSPublisher as I noticed a
lot of things were done qui
14 matches
Mail list logo
