Re: Can't get https://closureidl.googlecode.com/files/svg.js

I didn't know if it was relevant for maven (anywhere) or not. I can't see any pom.xml in that repo. But I encourntered this after ant super-clean / ant all in asjs when I was checking the builds in a new local setup. It was another google archiving of a download (new download url) ... I think it wa

Re: Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer

Welcome Greg :) On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:30 PM, OK wrote: > Greg Dove wrote > > Flex has been my livelihood for the last 9 years, so I am keen to help in > > the efforts to make its next official incarnation something we can all > > work > > with, leading into the next several years. > > Well sa

Re: Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer

Greg Dove wrote > Flex has been my livelihood for the last 9 years, so I am keen to help in > the efforts to make its next official incarnation something we can all > work > with, leading into the next several years. Well said, congrats and welcome Greg! Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 11:15 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi gu >Hire about this option: we ship the release and address this issue with >asf legal to settle this discussion once and for all. All we need are some more +1 votes. > >I understand Justin's point. On the other side I understand you guys, >th

AW: Can't get https://closureidl.googlecode.com/files/svg.js

Flexunit uses is? Strange. I'll have a look at it. Thanks for mentioning though :-) Chris Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Greg Dove Datum: 07.09.16 07:09 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Can't get https://closurei

AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

Hi gu Hire about this option: we ship the release and address this issue with asf legal to settle this discussion once and for all. I understand Justin's point. On the other side I understand you guys, that want to get stuff out the door. I don't understand your continued objections to Justin's

Re: Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer

Thanks Alex, Yishay, I'm real pleased to be on board! Flex has been my livelihood for the last 9 years, so I am keen to help in the efforts to make its next official incarnation something we can all work with, leading into the next several years. I look forward to collaborating with you and othe

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

Agreed. I’m not even convinced we need the mention of the MIT license for OpenFL (there was no verbatim code copied). Even if we do mention it, including the full license text is not a release blocker and can be treated as a bug for the next release. On Sep 7, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Alex Harui wro

FW: [MAVEN-BUILD] FlexJS Framework (maven) - Build # 238 - Failure

Chris, how do we interpret this? It is building fine for me with Ant. All I did was add a new interface. -Alex On 9/6/16, 10:01 PM, "Apache Jenkins Server" wrote: >The Apache Jenkins build system has built FlexJS Framework (maven) (build >#238) > >Status: Failure > >Check console output at >h

RE: Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer

Congratulations Greg, good to have you on board. From: Alex Harui Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:49 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer Hi folks, The Apache Flex PMC is excited to welcome Greg

Re: FlexJS - roadmap to 1.0 release

Hi Justin, Just today I was thinking of finally getting around to trying Moonshine on my Windows computer. More below... On 9/6/16, 9:42 PM, "Justin M. Hill" wrote: > >Hi Alex and FlexJS community, > >Given that 0.70 of FlexJS is nearing release, I would like to revive a >request I made in Apr

Re: Can't get https://closureidl.googlecode.com/files/svg.js

Chris, just following up on this thread, because it is sort of similar fyi I noticed a similar issue in the flexunit repo today and updated a download url in the ant build in there. I did not see anything to do here for Maven, but figured I should let you know in case that is somewhere else.

Welcome Greg Dove as Apache Flex Committer

Hi folks, The Apache Flex PMC is excited to welcome Greg Dove as our newest committer! Greg has recently contributed improvements for FlexJS binary data handling, and test cases and bug fixes for data binding on FlexJS which earned him the merit to become a committer (yes, you can become a commit

FlexJS - roadmap to 1.0 release

Hi Alex and FlexJS community, I have been following this thread: Re: Will we have a new release out the door till 8th of September? I wanted to provide a brief update: We have been working hard on getting a new version of the Moonshine IDE ready and released through the Apple App Store. We ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 4:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I believe Justin is concerned about how, when we generate the externs >> files for CreateJs by hacking their source code, that the resulting >> externs file no longer contains the CreateJS header. > >Correct. > >> It is my understanding that

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 3:54 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> While you are technically correct, I'd still ship this RC. > >So you’re advocating ignoring the terms of a 3rd party license and >ignoring ASF policy on releases? I'm not ignoring the policy. The policy states: "assuming that said license a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > I believe Justin is concerned about how, when we generate the externs > files for CreateJs by hacking their source code, that the resulting > externs file no longer contains the CreateJS header. Correct. > It is my understanding that the externs file is not a port of existing > implementa

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

Justin, We don't have to fix every issue during a release. Please file a JIRA ticket so that we can fix this in the next release. Thanks, Om On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > While you are technically correct, I'd still ship this RC. > > So you’re advocating ign

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > While you are technically correct, I'd still ship this RC. So you’re advocating ignoring the terms of a 3rd party license and ignoring ASF policy on releases? I’ll let Chris speak for himself but I’m sure he can use a snapshot / nightly release for this talk so I don’t think here’s no r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 12:17 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I don’t believe headers were removed from any file. What file are you >referring to? I believe Justin is concerned about how, when we generate the externs files for CreateJs by hacking their source code, that the resulting externs file no longer contains th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

I don’t believe headers were removed from any file. What file are you referring to? On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Sorry but it’s -1 binding as removing the license header on a 3rd party file > is against ASF legal policy.

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 7:41 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >-1 (binding). The LICENSE file mentions 2 MIT licensed pieces of software >but we are not including the copyright or text of the respective MIT >license as required by terms of the MIT license. [1] Normally in a source >release you would add a l

Re: Copy

sorry, wrong email > On 06 Sep 2016, at 16:27, Greg Sedlock wrote: > > Payment for what? > > -Original Message- > From: Jefferey rawdon [mailto:jeffere...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:56 AM > To: Recipients > Subject: Copy > > This mail is to inform you that the p

Re: Flex 3.6 to 4.9 Migration issue.

On 9/6/16, 2:29 AM, "jigar911" wrote: >we are using ColumnChart however it is showing exception related to >CartesianChart Pretty sure ColumnChart extends CartesianChart. I see that there are custom styles for this ColumnChart. What styles are being set? -Alex

Re: [FlexJS] Bubbling Problem

This bubbling issue where something deep in this display list unexpectedly called a listener at a much higher level that wasn't expecting a different event type or target annoyed me surprisingly frequently back in the day. Touch/mouse events are perfect candidates for bubbling because you are actua

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

On 9/6/16, 8:11 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think >>there >> will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that >> folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future >> releases of Crea

Re: [FlexJS] Bubbling Problem

On 9/6/16, 1:38 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I don’t understand what you mean. > >It seems to me that bubbling is functionality that users would expect and >implementing bubbling should have very little overhead. Yes, people misused (IMO) bubbling quite frequently in existing Flex code. It is very tempt

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think there > will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that > folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future > releases of CreateJS itself. That’s not the issue here. I agree that p

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Thanks for the explanation. My point is that flexjs-maven-plugin is not in the Ant-produced source package we are voting on so to be truly release compliant, the vote should also include the flexjs-maven-plugin sources which I think are found in what you describe below as #2? If so, we can post a

Re: ApacheCon EU Talks?

My circumstances have changes and I am not thinking I will make it to Europe this calendar year. Thanks, -Alex On 9/6/16, 1:03 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >I know I'm running late with this, but I just wanted to ask if and what >talks you guys submitted for ApacheCon EU this November?

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Well, this debate is in the archives, but I will attempt to explain again: The included files are patch files, not source files. I don't think there will be confusion that the patch files are copies of the source and that folks will attempt to modify the patch files in order modify future release

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

The Ant package for Falcon bundles the flex-typedefs repo and calls the Ant scripts within. Those scripts download third-party typedefs/externs/sources. It isn't obvious how Harbs is getting the error he is seeing. It could be something wrong with the Git apply of the patches, or maybe FALCONJX_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, -1 (binding). The LICENSE file mentions 2 MIT licensed pieces of software but we are not including the copyright or text of the respective MIT license as required by terms of the MIT license. [1] Normally in a source release you would add a local file pointer to the full text in LICENSE [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, Sorry but it’s -1 binding as removing the license header on a 3rd party file is against ASF legal policy. [1] If this instance can be shown to acceptable within ASF policy and/or good reason given for its removal quite happy to change my vote to +1 for this RC. Would also change my vote to

RE: Copy

Payment for what? -Original Message- From: Jefferey rawdon [mailto:jeffere...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 3:56 AM To: Recipients Subject: Copy This mail is to inform you that the payment as be made, Download attachment for the payment slip. Jefferey rawdon

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

It looks to me like the approve script downloaded the typedefs. Although, the only thing I see in the createjs folder is the patch files. On Sep 6, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Harbs, > > > I think in the Ant build the typedefs are built by the falcon Ant build by > changin

AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi Harbs, I think in the Ant build the typedefs are built by the falcon Ant build by changing to a directory relative to falcons directory. I would assume that you need to have the flexjs-typedef directory in parallell to the flexjs-compiler directory. Chris

Re: Flex 3.6 to 4.9 Migration issue.

we are using ColumnChart however it is showing exception related to CartesianChart Migrated Namespace used at top is as follows along with the code : -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-3-6-to-4-9-Migration-issue-tp54696p54858

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

I’m getting the following error. Suggestions? download_tween: Getting: https://github.com/CreateJS/TweenJS/archive/0.6.2.zip To: /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFalcon/apache-flex-falconjx-0.7.0-src/flex-typedefs/createjs/target/downloads/tween-0.6.2.zip https://github.com/CreateJS/Tween

AW: AW: FlexJS Logo?

Thanks :-) Von: Deepak MS Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 10:44:40 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: FlexJS Logo? Here's the kinder logo then : ) http://pasteboard.co/hzEUfvsMJ.png You can download the image from 'Download Image' option on the top

Re: AW: FlexJS Logo?

Here's the kinder logo then : ) http://pasteboard.co/hzEUfvsMJ.png You can download the image from 'Download Image' option on the top right corner of the screen. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Well I would love the designs with the JS in the Style of the Flex ... for

Re: [FlexJS] Bubbling Problem

I don’t understand what you mean. It seems to me that bubbling is functionality that users would expect and implementing bubbling should have very little overhead. On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > IMO, bubbling is only for interactive events. When you > bubble an event, the ev

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1

+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/flexjs/0.7.0/rc1/apache-flex-flexjs-0.7.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or arch

ApacheCon EU Talks?

Hi, I know I'm running late with this, but I just wanted to ask if and what talks you guys submitted for ApacheCon EU this November? I don't want to interfere with any of the other talks as my stuff is usually "intermediate" stuff that cut's quite a lot of edges ;-) I was planning on submitt

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > I don't quite understand, why we have to remove the old header anyway ... > shouldn't it be possible to add the Apache header (would sort of be both in > there) ... the Patch file itself should have an Apache Header, I think. But > the resulting file shouldn't have the old header removed.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0

I did have gpg installed in the past. I’m not sure why it couldn’t find it. A reinstall of gpg tools resolved this… On Sep 6, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Do you have GPG installed? Is it on your path? To me it looks as if it can't > find the gpg executable. > > > Chris > > _

AW: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0

Do you have GPG installed? Is it on your path? To me it looks as if it can't find the gpg executable. Chris Von: Harbs Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 09:21:36 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0 I’m getting the f

AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

To add my 5ct to the discussion. I don't quite understand, why we have to remove the old header anyway ... shouldn't it be possible to add the Apache header (would sort of be both in there) ... the Patch file itself should have an Apache Header, I think. But the resulting file shouldn't have t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0

Hi, It assumes you are using gpg [1] to verify the signatures, you may not have it installed? Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.7.0

I’m getting the following error when running the approval script. Any ideas? gpg_check: BUILD FAILED /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:285: The following error occurred while executing this line: /Users/harbs/Documents/ApacheFlex/ApproveFlexJS/ApproveFlexJS.xml:28

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin > sources are not in the source package. However, it appears the > flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in the source.jar for flexjs-maven-plugin, > so I think we can just consider that source.jar as one of the artefacts. You

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi, > For now I would just claim that the Ant release isn't intended on being built > with Maven untill we have the first binaries for jburg-types and build-tools > out the door. Fair enough as long as work works that enough to compile the source package and vote. Thanks, Justin

AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

The Maven release-build usually produces 3 4 archives for each Maven module: 1) The Jar itself 2) Sources Jar containing the sources and resources of the module but in a structure that matches that of the classes in the normal jar (This is used by IntelliJ and Eclipse to auto-download and displ