Rats. Good point…
On May 9, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Isn't tan issue with Array.forEach() that you can't use 'break' to stop
> the loop?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/8/16, 3:41 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> So would this be a workable solution?
>>
>> This:
>>
>> for each(item in object){
>>
Send an email to: dev-subscr...@flex.apache.org[1]
Harbs
[1]http://flex.apache.org/community-mailinglists.html
On May 9, 2016, at 8:52 AM, saicharan.see...@ebix.com wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I would like to get notifications on FlexJs by subscribing to dev list of it .
>
>
> Thanks,
> Charan
>
>
This is good.
What about acceptable arguments?
Off the top of my head, there’s
1. remove circulars (which I never totally understood)
2. strict XML
3. debug options
4. keep-asdoc (how well does this work?)
5. flexlib
etc.
Without clear documentation of all this stuff, it feels very overwhelming.
This is good.
What about acceptable arguments?
Off the top of my head, there’s
1. remove circulars (which I never totally understood)
2. strict XML
3. debug options
4. keep-asdoc (how well does this work?)
5. flexlib
etc.
Without clear documentation of all this stuff, it feels very overwhelming.
On 5/8/16, 5:33 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m trying to set up some development environments and I realized there’s
>lots of pieces and I’m not sure how everything fits together.
>
>FalconJX currently generates the following scripts and executables:
>
>Scripts:
>Asjsc - compiles AS app to JS with JS.
Chris,
Looks like there was more than pom.xml changes which are breaking the
build. Can you revert changes to the .as files?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/7/16, 8:14 AM, "cd...@apache.org" wrote:
>Repository: flex-asjs
>Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/develop 1149ba78c -> d26cf8091
>
>
>- Bumped the ver
Hi ,
I would like to get notifications on FlexJs by subscribing to dev list of it .
Thanks,
Charan
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the
intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information, or copying of this message is prohi
On 5/8/16, 2:36 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m going through Flash code and converting it to FlexJS…
>
>Is there any reason there’s no flex.utils.TimerEvent for Timer event
>constants? If not, I’ll add it…
Well, one thing I wanted to do differently in FlexJS vs Flex was have
fewer event classes. Eac
Isn't tan issue with Array.forEach() that you can't use 'break' to stop
the loop?
-Alex
On 5/8/16, 3:41 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>So would this be a workable solution?
>
>This:
>
>for each(item in object){
> item.doSomething();
>}
>
>Would become:
>
>if (!!object.forEach){
> object.forEac
On 5/8/16, 1:18 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I’m still having trouble with the spec, though. The spec has the
>following in [[Append]]:
>
>3. If Type(V) is XMLList,
> a. Let x.[[TargetObject]] = V.[[TargetObject]]
> b. Let x.[[TargetProperty]] = V.[[TargetProperty]]
> c. Let n = V.[[Length]]
> d. If
On 5/8/16, 4:34 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Well I agree that it would be good to share instances of things, but not
>configuration. Especially not sharing stuff between different instances
>of different compilers. Just as an example: MXMLJSC sets a different
>backend then COMPJSC does ...
Good page, Harbs. We should move it under the FlexJS tree somewhere.
I have no objections to changing "externs" to something else.
One nit: it says externs are "linked at compile-time". Might be better to
say, "used for type-checking at compile-time".
Thanks,
-Alex
+1 for the renaming to typedefs or anything but "externs"
Chris
Von: Harbs
Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Mai 2016 18:35:36
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: FlexJS identity crisis. was: [Discuss]Accept donation of drawing
APIs
FWIW, I was reflecting on the n
Well I agree that it would be good to share instances of things, but not
configuration. Especially not sharing stuff between different instances of
different compilers. Just as an example: MXMLJSC sets a different backend then
COMPJSC does ... sharing breaks things here.
In Ant you do fork="ye
I like the sound of "typedef SWCs" better than "extern SWCs". The meaning
of the name is more obvious, I think.
- Josh
On May 8, 2016 9:35 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
FWIW, I was reflecting on the naming a bit more today, and I’m thinking
that “FlexJS Typedefs” or “FlexJS Type Definitions” might be bette
I’m going through Flash code and converting it to FlexJS…
Is there any reason there’s no flex.utils.TimerEvent for Timer event constants?
If not, I’ll add it…
Harbs
FWIW, I was reflecting on the naming a bit more today, and I’m thinking that
“FlexJS Typedefs” or “FlexJS Type Definitions” might be better than “FlexJS
Externs”. I think typedefs are more descriptive than “externs”. On the other
hand, “externs” is a terminology already used by GCC.
The diagram
On 5/8/16, 5:21 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>
>Hi Alex,
>
>well actually the Ant build doesn't destroy the compiler, but the entire
>VM. To me it seems that for every compilation and every Unit test a new
>VM is forked. This is extremely expensive and time consuming. If you have
>a look at the
Forgot to respond to the "Just curious, what is the advantage of creating
instances of every tool in the group?"
In the FlexToolApi there is a mechanism that auto-detects Tool-Groups (in
flexJS there is the "Falcon" tool group and the "FlexJS" tool group)
In order to build an index of the tools a
I’m trying to set up some development environments and I realized there’s lots
of pieces and I’m not sure how everything fits together.
FalconJX currently generates the following scripts and executables:
Scripts:
asjsc
asjscompc
asnodec
compc
externc
jquery
mxmlc
Executables:
args4j.jar
commons
Hi Harbs,
thanks for writing and drawing this up. It exactly matches my impression and it
exactly matches the naming convention I used for the Mavenization as I used the
following group Ids:
org.apache.flex.flexjs.compiler
org.apache.flex.flexjs.framewort
org.apache.flex.flexjs.extern
I too th
Hi Alex,
well actually the Ant build doesn't destroy the compiler, but the entire VM. To
me it seems that for every compilation and every Unit test a new VM is forked.
This is extremely expensive and time consuming. If you have a look at the Flex
Jenkins and compare the build time of Falcon wi
Never mind: I just went ahead and bought it.
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Andrew Wetmore wrote:
> I am very interested to see this Android app. Andrew Wetmore,
> cottag...@gmail.com
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:08 AM, DarkStone wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> The Android app is now available on Google
I am very interested to see this Android app. Andrew Wetmore,
cottag...@gmail.com
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:08 AM, DarkStone wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The Android app is now available on Google Play:
>
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=air.com.verylab.app.tablet.android.NewsCenter
>
> If you
Hi.
The Android app is now available on Google Play:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=air.com.verylab.app.tablet.android.NewsCenter
If you have an Android tablet and you are interested in it, just reply to
this thread, leave your name and email, and I will give you promo code of
this
So would this be a workable solution?
This:
for each(item in object){
item.doSomething();
}
Would become:
if (!!object.forEach){
object.forEach(function(item){
item.doSomething();
});
} else {
var foreachiter0_target = object;
for (va
I don’t want to let this discussion die, because I think it’s important.
I think this naming strategy is a good one.
I put together a wiki page to help explain and help visualize the different
pieces[1]
I’m not sure that it’s all 100% accurate. Feel free to edit for accuracy and
general improv
OK. You are right about this.
When I do this:
list1 += list4 + xml2.z;// leaving out xml2.z prevents the next line from
adding to the original xml
list1[list1.length()] = ;
I get:
http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";>
hi
yeah!
So, anything added to the XMLList after
28 matches
Mail list logo
