On 4/20/16, 7:16 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>And what about calling that stuff "Flex 5"?
>
>We'd have the flex5 compiler (aka Falcon), framework (aka ASJS) ...
Possible, but IMO, Flex 5 implies more backward-compatibility than FlexJS
can currently deliver.
That said, as I've been working on
On 4/20/16, 8:47 AM, "Glenn Williams" wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>
>
>Sorry to bring this up again but im still not sure of the current state of
>the Falcon compiler regarding straight Flex applications.
Good question. I honestly don't know, because I haven't not taken the
time to try it. Voluntee
Hi folks,
Sorry to bring this up again but im still not sure of the current state of
the Falcon compiler regarding straight Flex applications.
I've tried to follow posts here as much as possible but I admit to being
slightly confused still.
While reading the 'FlexJS identity crisis' thr
And what about calling that stuff "Flex 5"?
We'd have the flex5 compiler (aka Falcon), framework (aka ASJS) ...
Chris
Von: Alex Harui
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. April 2016 07:02
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: FlexJS identity crisis. was: [Discuss]Acce
