Hi,
I would like to start creating a few FlexJS tools. I would like to add a
Powered by FlexJS logo to them, that links them back to our FlexJS website (we
do have such a thing? A shiny, landing page punting out the awesomeness of
FlexJS). Do we have such a logo? If not, could someone whip up
But if we don't have the libs, a can't compile the optional code. We wouldn't
require users to have them, but in order to build the lib, we would need them
... That's the problem.
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui
Done ... Should pop up in Maven central in a few hours our so. Just use
http://search.maven.org to find it. :-)
Chris
Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui
Datum: 10.02.2016 23:16 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org, thomas.
My go-to for testing simple JS is Adobe’s ExtendScript Toolkit. The ESTK (and
ExtendScript in general) uses an older version of SpiderMonkey (which supports
E4X).
It looks like the behavior there is different than what the JSFiddle shows.
Maybe it was a bug which has been fixed in more modern r
I've recently been switching over to === in my code, regardless of whether
a variable is typed as * or not.
- Josh
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 2/10/16, 1:50 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>
> >Based on a quick test, a member variable on a class that is uninitialized
https://jsfiddle.net/yww51Lp0/8/
On 2/10/16, 3:22 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>On 2/10/16, 2:47 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>>One of the big use cases to use strict equality is with Numbers and
>>Strings when you want to exclude 0 and empty strings.
>
>Sure, but in my testing, checking against null wi
On 2/10/16, 2:47 PM, "Harbs" wrote:
>One of the big use cases to use strict equality is with Numbers and
>Strings when you want to exclude 0 and empty strings.
Sure, but in my testing, checking against null with "==" works just as
well if the type is known.
>
>The reason this came up now is
One of the big use cases to use strict equality is with Numbers and Strings
when you want to exclude 0 and empty strings.
The reason this came up now is based on my work with E4X.
If I’m reading the spec correctly, it differentiates between namespaces with
prefixes which are undefined and prefi
On 2/10/16, 1:50 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Based on a quick test, a member variable on a class that is uninitialized
>will be undefined with the current JavaScript output. When a member
>variable is initialized, we currently output that in the constructor, but
>we don't output any fallback def
Hi Chris. Can you push this out? I'm getting tired of dealing with
SourceForge redirects.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/7/16, 3:19 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>I just staged a new maven release of the JBurg library in version 1.10.2.
>I double checked the bytecode version by extracting class f
Based on a quick test, a member variable on a class that is uninitialized
will be undefined with the current JavaScript output. When a member
variable is initialized, we currently output that in the constructor, but
we don't output any fallback default values for uninitialized members. To
me, that
Untyped variables are undefined by default. ActionScript does automatic
coercion when a variable is typed, so it becomes null for String or Object,
NaN for Number, or 0 for uint/int. Currently, this automatic coercion is
lost during cross-compilation.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Harbs wrote
I’m not sure about a point in the cross-compiler:
IFAIK, all uninitiated properties in typed ActionScript Classes are null. In
Javascript, uninitiated properties are undefined.
If I’m using strict comparison in cross-compiled ActionScript “myObj.someProp
=== null”, will that cross-compile corre
On 2/10/16, 3:23 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I missed an issue here:
>
>Taking an example from the spec:
>e.employee.(name == "Jim").setChildren(John + 35);
>
>or:
>var employeedata = Fred + 28 +
>skiing;
>
>We need a method to concatenate two or more XML objects into an XML
>object. I see two ways to
I haven't looked at the code in detail, but if it is possible to have all
the logging libraries as external dependencies, it should be ok to accept
the AS3Commons Logging project, if at least a few of them have compatible
licenses.
Let's see where the revival of this discussion takes us. Maybe we
The process of generating a .AIR (or .AIRI) is actually generating a .SWF
with the AIR internals linked, then passing it to the AIR packager (which
takes that SWF and puts its packaging around it.
If you've ever broken apart a .apk, you will see a bunch of runtimes and a
huge chunk of code that is
Apache's rules are pretty clear about hosting the website -- they need to
do it on their existing platform, which only serves straight HTML pages
(they have a clustered system around the world).
The way I setup the CMS is that you use the CMS to make changes to the
site, then hit "publish". It th
Thanks! Yeah, I noticed some of the CSS changes I made yesterday didn't
port well to the sm and xs screen sizes. I need to fix that today.
-Nick
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Deepak MS wrote:
> Yup! Looks amazing. Crisp, neat and very appealing.
> However I came across this issue while I w
Yup! Looks amazing. Crisp, neat and very appealing.
However I came across this issue while I was keen to check the responsive
part of it, by re-sizing the browser.
http://snag.gy/gOmmh.jpg (both menu background and text colours are in
white when collapsed)
I'm sure it's just a simple styling glit
Hi Nicholas,
well regarding the hosting Problem. I am pretty sure if you contact the Infra
guys, that they will provide us with the means to host our website. I would
strongly object to host it anywhere outside the ASF. We could also use this for
running a BlazeDS or JSON service that the Tour
Hi Christophe,
I already had a detailed look at as3commons and what I found out is that quite
some of the dependencies (especially in the logging part) come from projects
that seem to have been given up. At least I couldn't find a single source for
those libraries. I also bet that we wouldn't n
I missed an issue here:
Taking an example from the spec:
e.employee.(name == "Jim").setChildren(John + 35);
or:
var employeedata = Fred + 28 + skiing;
We need a method to concatenate two or more XML objects into an XML object. I
see two ways to do this:
1. Add a concat method to XML which retu
I think the lime green text for links needs to be darkened, usability issue.
Other than that it's definitely 2016 responsive bootstrap, nice. :)
Mike
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > You can see a preview of it here : http://flex.suroot.com
>
> Looking good.
Hi all,
sorry to jump in late here. I'm the original founder and one of the main
authors of AS3Commons and wanted to give some feedback on the things I read
here:
- renaming: I don't have an issue with this but not sure what the gain is
here, apart from a more consistent and integrated feel with
Hi Justin
I would be honored, if the title really was: "Internet of Things - yes Chris
more blinking LEDs :-)" :-P
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2016 06:47:40
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going an
25 matches
Mail list logo
