[FlexJS] Installer downloading Google Closure redundantly?

I think this is mostly for Alex. I have been working on replicating the installer functionality in a node.js module installer. I am looking at the Installer log and mimicking all the downloads and file copies. I remember adding Google Closure download support for FlexJS a while ago. I also see

Re: flexjs ERROR - Circular dependency detected

On 11/29/15, 6:38 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >test.zip >> > >have this error,the release not work. > >i do not know,is it can resolve? We can try to allow that. The Google folks think you shouldn't have that kind of circula

Re: flexjs ERROR - Circular dependency detected

test.zip have this error,the release not work. i do not know,is it can resolve? if it bug,must can not be resolve,i will find other way. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.na

[4.15.0] # Apache Flex SDK 4.15.0 nightly build 114: Successful

flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #114 - Successful Changes since last build: No changes For more information, check the console output at http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/114/.

Re: Flex Mobile - Splash Screen Image appears in rendered images

Hi Om, the splashScreenImage is added this way: -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Mobile-Splash-Screen-Image-appears-in-rendered-images-tp50325p50342.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Thanks for the reminder. I'll get the trademark attribution cleaned up this week. Would it be acceptable to create a specific legal page, linked from the footer, that displays the Apache Flex trademark attribution text? I should probably acknowledge some Adobe trademarks too, just to be safe, so t

Re: Flex Mobile - Splash Screen Image appears in rendered images

Hi Alex, when I setted the splashScreenImage to null it was not working... I changed something in the part of the app how to create and add body parts to the avatar and this solved the problem... but I am still confused, what the SplashScreenImage had to do with this... -- View this message in

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Thank you for the pledge! I'm definitely going to add many new tutorials there. Especially for using third party libraries, which I feel is what will help catch the eyes of more potential FlexJS users. At least on the ActionScript transpiler side of things. - Josh On Nov 29, 2015 1:44 AM, "Harbs"

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

OK. I did not understand what your objection was. Thanks for making that clear. I never noticed code licensing in tutorials before (and I’ve never thought about it). I just did a quick search on the topic and the footer on the Java page here[1]. Seems like a good way to go about it. The Angula

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Hi, > There is currently no code on the website. There is code on the site in the link provided - for instance under step 3. Either way this is simply resolved no need for a long discussion. Thanks, Justin

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

There is currently no code on the website. There is only a single tutorial (and hopefully more soon). There is a “Tools and Utilities” page[1] which links to the Apache Flex website and dts2as on Github. Both have the license clearly stated. [1]http://nextgenactionscript.com/tools-and-utilitie

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Hi, > I agree we have to be careful, but let's not go overboard with the > carefulness. Not suggesting we go overboard just that we don’t link to any content that is not following Apache trademark policy and when the license is unclear. If those two items are fixed (and they easily and simply a

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We have to be a little careful here to not be seen to endorse 3rd parties > from our official site. > I agree we have to be careful, but let's not go overboard with the carefulness. Right now, we have 3 prominent links to Adobe co

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Hi, We have to be a little careful here to not be seen to endorse 3rd parties from our official site. Currently that code is "Copyright 2015 Bowler Hat LLC” and not under any obvious license, it would be nice if that was made clearer. Josh it would also be good if you attribute Apache tradema

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

> > I think that sources outside the Apache website is probably the best way > to get traction (and if someone can make a few bucks off their content, > even better). I think we should feature Josh’s site on the Flex site (as > well as anyone else who wants to put in the effort of creating learning

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Good point on React’s JSX. I did not know that Josh created that site. Cool! I’d love to see some more stuff there! (I just pledged a few bucks as a patron there.) I think that sources outside the Apache website is probably the best way to get traction (and if someone can make a few bucks off t

Re: FlexJS Brand Positioning

Agree with all your points! Here is one more: FlexJS's MXML is a real alternative for React's JSX, which looks very similar to MXML [1] 1. Good timing, I am currently working on node.js support for FlexJS. The goal is to make FlexJS installable via a simple "npm install flexjs" command. I hop

FlexJS Brand Positioning

I was thinking of writing a blog post about FlexJS, and I realized that FlexJS can mean different things to different people. 1. FlexJS (or really FalconJX) can be a competitor for TypeScript. I can imagine people using it to write framework agnostic javascript libraries. 2. FlexJS is a replacem