Hi Alan,
I think I have an idea why Installer 3.1 didn't work for you. There is a URL
override that wasn't implemented in locales other than en_US. I've propagated
the override to our other locales, so maybe try again. I noticed your email
ends with it, and we don't have localized strings fo
Yeah, it complained about 52. I'm running 51. No need to go all the way
back to 1.6 since I think it is fair to require 1.7 to compile Falcon, but
up to you.
-Alex
On 11/21/15, 10:01 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Well if it's compiled with 1.8 I could just re-compile with 1.6 and
>deploy as I
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #106 - Successful
Changes since last build:
No changes
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/106/.
Well if it's compiled with 1.8 I could just re-compile with 1.6 and deploy as I
was the one that released that jar. But are you sure it's bytecode major
version is 52 I know that I build most stuff with 1.8, but I usually set the
compiler to output max 51 (Java 7)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nach
