On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Instead of replying individually to all of these posts, let me see if I
> can summarize my thoughts here:
>
> For sure, we should try Maven. I think the main questions, since there’s
> been so much emphasis lately on making it easier for new
Hi,
Every once in a while, the framework code uses an “internal class”. An
examples would look like:
package some.package
{
public class SomeClass
{
}
}
class SomeHelperClass
{
}
SomeHelperClass is an “internal class”. In JS, SomeHelperClass gets
defined on the global object. I’m wonde
Instead of replying individually to all of these posts, let me see if I
can summarize my thoughts here:
For sure, we should try Maven. I think the main questions, since there’s
been so much emphasis lately on making it easier for new contributors to
contribute are:
1) I think it will take weeks
Draft announcement. Feedback please. On my Monday I’ll be updating the
website links referenced from this announcement.
Thanks,
-Alex
-
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the initial (alpha)
release of Apache FlexJS SDK 0.5.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX Compiler 0.5.0.
Apache Fl
On 11/15/15, 8:49 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>BTW, how are we handling “for each” loops?
If you do defineProperties as I just described in my last post, I think
for each will “just work”. You will have to hide from enumeration the
functions like name(), child(), etc.
-Alex
On 11/15/15, 7:55 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>Right, but I don’t see any way around this. Simple property access will
>not work for the reasons I wrote above.
My thinking was that, for some XML like:
Alex
Harui
< committer id=“2”>
Peter
Ent
Flex
FlexJS
Hi,
Now the FlexJS releases are just about to be announced, I think it's about time
we made a Flex SDK release as the previous one was released was way back in
March.
Unless anyone else want to give it a go I’ll act as the release manager.
Is there any regression issues in 4.14/4.14.1 that any
Hi,
> I could ask my boss, if I could give such a course ... probably as a remote
> course (But If you're somewhere near Frankfurt, we could eventually have some
> offline-attendants).
Timezones permitting I’ll be up for that.
Justin
Hi,
> Similarly, we could have Maven binaries packaged with the src and binary
> releases. This eliminates the need for sdk devs and end users to have
> maven installed.
We could add that to the binary release but not the source release, you can’t
have jars in a source release.
Previous vers
In one of the companies I worked at, we had the maven binaries living
inside a 'build' folder. There was no need to have Maven pre-installed on
the computer, since it was available from the repo.
Similarly, we could have Maven binaries packaged with the src and binary
releases. This eliminates
Here’s the link:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/E4X+Observations
On Nov 15, 2015, at 6:01 PM, Harbs wrote:
> I added it in a new XML section in FlexJS.
>
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/15/15, 7:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>>
>>> I guess so. I
BTW, how are we handling “for each” loops?
On Nov 12, 2015, at 11:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK, it’s a deal. I will look into some changes to the compiler.
>
> I think the changes are:
> 1) XML literals will call "new XML(literal_as_string)" and your code will
> parse the string
> 2) delete o
I added it in a new XML section in FlexJS.
On Nov 15, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/15, 7:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I guess so. I find Google docs easier to edit.
>
> I don’t doubt that, and I’m sorry it will be extra hassle, but it is more
> clear you are sharing your
Right, but I don’t see any way around this. Simple property access will not
work for the reasons I wrote above.
On Nov 15, 2015, at 5:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> The compiler does not know that myXML is from myClass so it would simply
> add a property access to foo. Now we could require that f
On 11/15/15, 7:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>>For #1, my thoughts were that you would not use Array as the base class
>> for XML and XMLList and instead populate it via defineProperties with
>> indexes. You could also populate it with defineProperties for known
>>child
>> tag names and have the getter
On 11/15/15, 7:02 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I guess so. I find Google docs easier to edit.
I don’t doubt that, and I’m sorry it will be extra hassle, but it is more
clear you are sharing your work with the ASF if you put it on ASF servers,
and the committers already should have accounts set up for t
I guess so. I find Google docs easier to edit.
On Nov 15, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Can you move that to the wiki?
>
> On 11/15/15, 6:27 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> FWIW:
>> As I’m working on XML, I’m finding that some of the finer points of E4X
>> are not clear without testing and se
On Nov 15, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/15, 12:45 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>
>> I was not thinking very clearly last week when we had this discussion.
>> We’re missing a very important piece here:
>>
>> xml.foo returns an XMLList and not an XML object. If you have some xml
>
Can you move that to the wiki?
On 11/15/15, 6:27 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>FWIW:
>As I’m working on XML, I’m finding that some of the finer points of E4X
>are not clear without testing and seeing results. I’m documenting my
>observations here:
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zqcdt4Uv8eP1a7bSO7pzd
On 11/15/15, 12:45 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I was not thinking very clearly last week when we had this discussion.
>We’re missing a very important piece here:
>
>xml.foo returns an XMLList and not an XML object. If you have some xml
>like this: , xml.foo
>will give you an XMLList with 2 foo elements
Well,
as a matter of fact, I not only use maven, I also teach it. Have coached a lot
of companies and have prepared a complete Maven course with working samples and
lessons.
I could ask my boss, if I could give such a course ... probably as a remote
course (But If you're somewhere near Frankfu
FWIW:
As I’m working on XML, I’m finding that some of the finer points of E4X are not
clear without testing and seeing results. I’m documenting my observations here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zqcdt4Uv8eP1a7bSO7pzdjePolmDCN3K49R-LyoHeQQ/edit?usp=sharing
If anyone has what to add, please
I think I’m in the “let’s try Maven” camp as well.
I think it’s safe to say that ant is not a clear good fit. Yes. It works, but a
lot of us have had trouble with it.
Like Om, I don’t see a difference between requiring ant and requiring maven.
The one time I did try Maven to build something, it
I was not thinking very clearly last week when we had this discussion. We’re
missing a very important piece here:
xml.foo returns an XMLList and not an XML object. If you have some xml like
this: , xml.foo will give
you an XMLList with 2 foo elements xml.baz will give you an XMLList with 1
ele
24 matches
Mail list logo
