Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
FWIW, I have the following two files in /usr/local/Cellar/ant/1.9.6/libexec/lib: apache-rat-0.8.jar apache-rat-tasks-0.8.jar On Nov 11, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Harbs wrote: > The signature check is failing for me: > > gpg_check: > gpg: Signature made Wed Nov 11 09:19:23 2015 IST using RSA key ID DA9

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
The signature check is failing for me: gpg_check: gpg: Signature made Wed Nov 11 09:19:23 2015 IST using RSA key ID DA9CCFF2 gpg: Good signature from "Alex Harui (CODE SIGNING KEY) " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the sig

[VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, This is vote for the 0.5.0 release of the FalconJX (and Falcon) compilers. There is no separate Falcon-only release package at this time. The only purpose of the FalconJX packages are to serve as upstream packages for the FlexJS release. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist

[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.5.0 RC3

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
This is the discussion thread. RC2 didn¹t build for me so we¹re skipping ahead to RC3. Changes in this RC include: -Changes to NOTICE files to resolve issues found in RC1 -Changes to binary packages to resolve issues found in RC1 -Changes to copyright notices in GCL.SWC source. In addition, we

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
BTW, I just ran a quick test of adding an XML and XMLList class to the DragDrop SWC. I create XML.as in DragDrop/as/src package { public class XML { public function XML() { } } } XMLList is essentially the same. Then in DragDropClasses I added: COMPILE::JS {

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
Really, you can choose any baseline you want for your XML SWC. Folks targeting something might have to resort to JSON. Or someone else will create an IE9 compatible version. If there is a significant win to having the baseline be IE10 for your swc, it doesn’t require that for other classes. We

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
Great! Minimum of IE10 would make things even easier, but I think IE9 is fine for what I’m working on now. On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:29 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > We are now saying IE9. We are using Object.defineProperties. > > Folks targeting IE8 and older should deploy the SWF version. > > -Alex

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
We are now saying IE9. We are using Object.defineProperties. Folks targeting IE8 and older should deploy the SWF version. -Alex On 11/10/15, 3:25 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >BTW, what’s our minimum browser target for FlexJS? > >Are we supporting IE8? I’m kind of hoping I can ignore IE8 WRT XML >suppo

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
BTW, what’s our minimum browser target for FlexJS? Are we supporting IE8? I’m kind of hoping I can ignore IE8 WRT XML support. On Nov 11, 2015, at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Good luck. > > Setting COMPILE::JS should have no effect on code completion offerings > unless it controls APIs in sou

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
Good luck. Setting COMPILE::JS should have no effect on code completion offerings unless it controls APIs in source code you wrote yourself. The rest of the offerings come from the SWCs in the library-path (and external-library-path) and which flags were on when the SWC was compiled. I added some

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
OK. I’ll try working with ant for now. I’ll try getting some code to compile in the morning. If there’s no code completion for now anyway, I’ll just set -define=COMPILE::JS,false for now. That will at least allow me to use FB as a code editor. Maybe I’ll see if Sublime give me some code complet

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/10/15, 1:50 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I just tried in Core as well. If I set “-define=COMPILE::JS,true” which >is what I believe we need to get code recognition and completion, I get >lots of errors in FB. > >Am I going about this wrong? As I said in at the beginning of my last reply, I don’t

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
I just tried in Core as well. If I set “-define=COMPILE::JS,true” which is what I believe we need to get code recognition and completion, I get lots of errors in FB. Am I going about this wrong? On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >> I’m not sure you answered my primary question he

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/10/15, 11:16 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I’m not sure you answered my primary question here. How do I target >HTML/JS native classes like Document, DOMParser, etc. in ActionScript? I >don’t want to do that in js. I’d rather have FlaconJX cross-compile it >for me. Not sure about what FlashBuilder

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
I’m not sure you answered my primary question here. How do I target HTML/JS native classes like Document, DOMParser, etc. in ActionScript? I don’t want to do that in js. I’d rather have FlaconJX cross-compile it for me. Regarding decoding and encoding XML: Yes. That might be a good way to go. I’

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/10/15, 8:54 AM, "Jim Norris" wrote: >Backward compatibility with our large set of deployed (XML based) content >is critical, so very likely JS rather than JSON. Follow up: I agree that you wouldn’t want to change what is stored in the database. I’m probing the notion of whether you cou

RE: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Jim Norris
Backward compatibility with our large set of deployed (XML based) content is critical, so very likely JS rather than JSON. Jim -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:36 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS]

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks Jim, We’ll keep that in mind. Just curious, if FlexJS didn’t exist and you had to use some other JS framework, would you port all of your XML handling to JS or switch over to JSON? Other folks with XML backend are welcome to add their thoughts as well. -Alex On 11/10/15, 8:30 AM, "Jim N

RE: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Jim Norris
Hello, I have been observing the progress on FlexJS as I am the developer for an application built with Flex that my company deploys into large enterprises. We have XML based content and use a significant number of E4X expressions, so if there is a way to simplify the conversion of these expres

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
Also, don’t spend too long on trying to create an XML class in the default package. You can just code it in some package and manually map it for now. And maybe we’ll just end up having the compiler inject the mapping if that turns out to be easier. -Alex On 11/10/15, 6:18 AM, "Alex Harui" wrot

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Alex Harui
The key is in the build.xml and compile-asjs-config.xml in any of the already-backported SWCs. The js.swc from Falcon is used instead of playerglobal.swc/airglobal.swc. I have not tried to swap out a class in the default package yet, but it should be doable. We might need a compiler change if th

RE: Re: [FlexJS] Back port

2015-11-10 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
Well not to mention the inline filtering which is part of the ease of use for the e4x, but harder to recreate. mySVG.parent.(somefield=="criteria") -Mark -Original Message- From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash Muppirala Sent: Monday, November 09,

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
I’m a bit stumped here. We have externs for HTML and native javascript APIs. Right? How do I import these externs so these classes are recognized when using COMPILE::JS? Actually, I just searched for DOMParser and createHTMLDocument. Neither searched turned anything up in FlexJS. So I’m wonderi

Re: [FALCONJX][FLEXJS] XML handling (was Re: [FlexJS] Back port)

2015-11-10 Thread Harbs
I’m going to have to do some fancy footwork to get this working. Flash Builder is complaining that palyerglobal.swc already exists whe I try to create an XML class in the default package. Any ideas on how to do this? On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Harbs wrote: > OK. This approach is different t