Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

Hi, > Hmm, I was hoping more PMC folks would respond. Remember that, according > to the release process, the PMC folks planning to vote are supposed to be > running tests now. In theory, the only new test to be run after we start > the vote is whether the PGP signature is valid. We’re continual

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

Been busy with work. I should have some time over the weekend. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 10/26/15, 11:14 AM, "Harbs" wrote: > > >I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I > >checked all the right things, but I did check wh

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache FlexJS 0.5.0

On 10/26/15, 11:14 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I >checked all the right things, but I did check what I could. > >I do think we should get this out, and start on the next version… Hmm, I was hoping more PMC folks would respond. Remember

Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)

Update: I got all of the classes in HTML to cross-compile, and DataBindingExample ran and seemed to work. Along the way, I found and fixed several bugs in Falcon. While this back-port from JS to AS isn’t going out in the 0.5.0 release, the fixes to Falcon are since folks writing AS for JS would

[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Github user aharui commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152585318 Hi SlavaRa, (Apologies if this gets posted twice. I think email replies as comments isn't working) Do you have a link that supports your claim that the

Re: [GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Hi SlavaRa, Do you have a link that supports your claim that the compiler cannot generate the correct optimization? This article seems to imply that it can [1] IMO, the string concatenation is easier to read. I would want to see actual profiling that shows that the string concatenation is affec

Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS

sorry,i have bad english,so i can not write the wiki. but i make a blog,just simple make it work. http://matrix3d.github.io/as3/2015/10/30/flashdevelop-flexjs5/ -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-out-to-IDE-developers-to-suppo

Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS

It looks like you got it working with FlashDevelop. Nice! Could you post instructions on the wiki? On Oct 30, 2015, at 8:18 AM, lizhi wrote: > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-devel

[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Github user SlavaRa commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152506154 "I think "looks bad" is a personal preference." Perhaps, but in this situation, combined the two approaches StringBuffer.append and string concatenations.. in this c

[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Github user Harbs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152503636 I'd think the compiler optimizes the string concatenation, so there's no difference in performance: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1532461/stringbuilder-vs-string

[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Github user SlavaRa commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152467858 I would like to help in the development of the compiler. But there is no desire to work with code that looks bad to say the least. Using string concatenation cont

[GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St...

Github user tomchiverton commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152466884 I don't see any reasoning behind why this was done - is this approach more performant or something ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e