I just pushed the .project files. I hope nothing else is broken.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Harbs wrote:
> Yes.I’m fine using a workaround for now. Although I can’t say I understand
> what you mean… ;-)
>
> On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >> 2) Get that to
Yes.I’m fine using a workaround for now. Although I can’t say I understand what
you mean… ;-)
On Oct 26, 2015, at 8:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> 2) Get that to work from the source folder (so I’m able to fix and add to
>> the develop branch and debug changes).
>
> We’ll see how much of that wor
On 10/26/15, 11:12 AM, "Harbs" wrote:
>I was actually just trying to follow the instructions on the wiki. I
>don’t remember right now exactly what I did, but I did create a new
>project and just copied the source files. For some reason that did not
>work. I’m using FB 4.5. Could that be the pro
I’m not super-familiar with this, so I’m not super-confident that I checked all
the right things, but I did check what I could.
I do think we should get this out, and start on the next version…
On Oct 26, 2015, at 7:47 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Has everyone who is planning to vote completed thei
I was actually just trying to follow the instructions on the wiki. I don’t
remember right now exactly what I did, but I did create a new project and just
copied the source files. For some reason that did not work. I’m using FB 4.5.
Could that be the problem?
I had some urgent things to take car
Has everyone who is planning to vote completed their examination of the
nightly builds for both Falcon and FlexJS? I really think we need to get
this stuff released.
-Alex
On 10/22/15, 10:30 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
>Thanks, Alex. I'll give that a try instead.
>
>- Josh
>On Oct 22, 2015 9:01
After seeing Luke’s email on a related topic, it occurred to me that you
are probably trying to get each SWC to work as an FB AS library project,
and then your app as a FlexJS application that relies on these library
projects. TBH, I haven’t really worked that way, but I think it should be
possibl
Hi Luke,
Comments in-line.
On 10/26/15, 7:33 AM, "LukeWilimitis" wrote:
>Thank you for the reply, Alex.
>
>>Do you mean the mx UI widgets like mx:TextInput? Can you provide a list
>>of which mx classes you are currently using?
>
>The app I am tasked with converting essentially uses a large amo
Thank you for the reply, Alex.
>Do you mean the mx UI widgets like mx:TextInput? Can you provide a list
>of which mx classes you are currently using?
The app I am tasked with converting essentially uses a large amount of
classes from mx.binding, mx.collections, and mx.controls. So yes, classes
