Hi Alex,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...Yep, and we have a library called Spark. I mentioned this in the June
> 2013 board report and no board member ever posted on our lists that we
> needed to do something about it
I'm not saying you need to do anything, just want
On 1/19/15, 3:40 AM, "e...@ixsoftware.nl" wrote:
>I have started the VOTE on 4.14 in the thread below.
>
>Please take a little time to download and test the artifacts, and cast
>your vote.
I have completed my approval pass. I’m curious as to what Justin is
claiming is a legal issue regarding
Try actually setting these things in the environment.
set
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=h:/flexsdk/flex-repo/dependencies/PlayerGlobal/player/
set AIR_HOME=h:/flexsdk/flex-repo/dependencies/AIRSDK/14.0/
set FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER=h:/flexsdk/flashplayer.exe
On 1/19/15, 10:53 PM, "piotrz" wrote:
>Build is f
This is a bug in the release convenience tool "ApproveSDK.xml", not
the SDK itself.
If you set the mentioned path variables for the entire system instead
of in a local .properties file, the warnings go away.
EdB
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 7:53 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Build is failing when I am using
> What we need is an independent Flash player.
OK. You have made your case, and then some.
Now, since this forum is dedicated to the development of Apache Flex,
can you maybe come to the point and discuss development related
issues?
Thanks,
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
Build is failing when I am using ApproveSDK.xml.
1) I've created folder
2) I've created approvefalcon.properties which contains paths:
env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=h:/flexsdk/flex-repo/dependencies/PlayerGlobal/player/
env.AIR_HOME=h:/flexsdk/flex-repo/dependencies/AIRSDK/14.0/
env.FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER=
@Jeffry, I do not think anyone in the company outside of the board had
anything to do with killing the player on Android. It was making no sense
for a good reason, there was no sense for it. I am making a case for the
very credible possibility that the whole thing has been a conspiracy
between Adob
Hector, you just point to another major issue with open source software,
One day down the road, in two weeks, two months or two years that guy and
his buddies who started the project walk out.The project cannot be pushed
forward by a distributed community and its contribution based on per hour
free
@Tom, I see your point and anticipate many others. We have the choice to be
part of the problem or the solution. Let's say there is a show blocker, a
piece of proprietary technology that we cannot engineer ourselves. I have
two answer to that. First, I see a huge PR campaign to tell the world "see,
Let's use the DISCUSS thread for discussing stuff, please?
EdB
On Monday, January 19, 2015, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.14.0 release candidate 1. For details on this
> release see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
>
> The release candidate can be found here;
>
>
Hi,
The change was only made in one place when it should of been made in several
places. The code is now possibly in an inconsistent state that may cause
regression issues, so I think we keep that JIRA open until it's fixed.
Personally I would of placed this fixed into develop not the release b
Hi,
Given this is a legal issue and effects a large portion of users - can we
actually make a release in this state? Or do we have to release a fixed
installer first?
Justin
Pretty sure this was discovered a while back. Neil Madsen fixed it for
the next Installer release, IIRC.
On 1/19/15, 2:10 PM, "Mahmoud Ali" wrote:
>I'm noticing a strange behavior when I go to the licenses screen.
>
>The first time I enter this screen I only see these licenses:
>Apache Flex SDK
I'm noticing a strange behavior when I go to the licenses screen.
The first time I enter this screen I only see these licenses:
Apache Flex SDK
Apache Air SDK
Adobe Flash Player playerglobal.swc
Adobe Embedded Font Libraries and Utilities
If I change the language, it doesn't matter which one, the
Actually, JSGoogEmitter.java still has code to emit that method, so,
"simply" removing the override in FlexJS should get you started ;-)
EdB
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Definitely!
>
> Edb
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 19, 2015, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> I think we’ve a
Justin most likely forgot to recompile the SDK he was using to review
my commits. He abandoned the discussion thread without further comment
when I mentioned that possibility, basically confirming that
assumption.
I triple checked the solution on a fresh SDK and re-affirmed the
validity of the Mus
Hi Erik,
This issue is mentioned in release notes ->
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34657
Justin comments it that is not fixed, so it probably should be removed from
the Release Notes.
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://a
Definitely!
Edb
On Monday, January 19, 2015, Alex Harui wrote:
> I think we’ve agreed that IE9 is now the oldest browser that FlexJS will
> support in terms of JS output. The original motivation was to get enough
> SVG support to do the graphics/skinning. Folks needing to run something
> on
I think we’ve agreed that IE9 is now the oldest browser that FlexJS will
support in terms of JS output. The original motivation was to get enough
SVG support to do the graphics/skinning. Folks needing to run something
on older browsers can deploy the SWF version since those old browsers
probably
On 1/19/15, 2:35 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Just wanted to make sure you guys are aware of http://falcon.apache.org/
>
>I think you have a module named "Falcon", so it's good to be aware of
>the possible confusion in your communications.
Yep, and we have a library called Spark.
On 1/19/2015 3:45 AM, jude wrote:
I'm also very upset at Adobe
CEO and the Adobe evangelists who made the decision for millions of
developers to remove Flash from Android (and slow Flash development
tremendously)
In fairness; I do not think Adobe Evangelists were involved in the
decision in a
I have started the VOTE on 4.14 in the thread below.
Please take a little time to download and test the artifacts, and cast
your vote.
Thanks!
EdB
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> Java version mentioned in the README is getting a bit long in the tooth. The
>> README
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #75 - Successful
Changes since last build:
[erik] Remove OFL fonts license step from Installer
[erik] Remove OFL query
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/flex-sdk_release-candidate/75/.
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.14.0 release candidate 1. For details on this
release see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.14.0/rc1/
The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective
platforms,
Hi,
Just wanted to make sure you guys are aware of http://falcon.apache.org/
I think you have a module named "Falcon", so it's good to be aware of
the possible confusion in your communications.
-Bertrand
On 19/01/15 09:52, Héctor A wrote:
I didn't mention Gnash because in some areas it seems to be behind
Lightspark and it seems development on it stopped years ago.
Yes, that was my point :-)
LightSpark doesn't look that active either.
But good luck !
Tom
I didn't mention Gnash because in some areas it seems to be behind
Lightspark and it seems development on it stopped years ago.
2015年1月19日月曜日、Tom Chiverton>さんは書きました:
> I wish you well, but the idea has been tried a number of times before, and
> because it wasn't able to use the Adobe Flash hardwa
flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #74 - Successful
Changes since last build:
[erik] Update with note that FlatSpark requires embedded font support
[erik] Last bit of version numbering update ;-)
For more information, check the console output at
http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/fle
I wish you well, but the idea has been tried a number of times before,
and because it wasn't able to use the Adobe Flash hardware abstraction
layer to access accelerated / battery optimised decode and display,
never mind video DRM, they tended to top out around compatibility with
Flash Player v
+1 I have been very angry about it as well. I'm also very upset at Adobe
CEO and the Adobe evangelists who made the decision for millions of
developers to remove Flash from Android (and slow Flash development
tremendously). They didn't consult the community of developers, businesses
and startups wh
30 matches
Mail list logo
