Hi,
Anyone else have anything to add before I make another RC?
Justin
Hi,
> I would prefer to not have Apache Flex releases use code with licenses
> that have “bad” words in it, which appears to be the case for the
> https://code.google.com/p/reflections/ library. I would not like the
> Installer to have to offer up those bad words for approval by the
> customer.
On 11/11/14, 3:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The "do what the f*ck you want" license has been discussed before as has
>this exact library on legal. It's is unresolved if you can use it. [1]
>
>The main concern "With a wildly permissive license like WTFPL, provenance
>might possibly get
Hi,
The "do what the f*ck you want" license has been discussed before as has this
exact library on legal. It's is unresolved if you can use it. [1]
The main concern "With a wildly permissive license like WTFPL, provenance might
possibly get overlooked." but it's also probably considered public
Yeah ... I was afraid of that. Perhaps I could whip up a mechanism.
I would strongly suggest not to expect our users to follow any form of
documentation.
>From my experience giving support for Flexmojos is simply that they won't read
>it.
I bet they even woudln't read stuff, even if the text was
On 11/11/14, 2:32 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>In order to automatically download the closure-library, a maven
>dependency is added to the corresponding jar file available at
>Maven-Central. This is not extracted to the filesystem, but is available
>to the compiler as static resources in the J
In order to automatically download the closure-library, a maven dependency is
added to the corresponding jar file available at Maven-Central. This is not
extracted to the filesystem, but is available to the compiler as static
resources in the Java classpath. In order to write these resources to
In which case I suggest we try to release flex-tool-api in the next few
weeks, so the 4.14 release can proceed on schedule (whatever that may mean,
I intend to be flexible with the dates, but only up to a point ;-))
EdB
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/14, 1:4
On 11/11/14, 1:44 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>in order to select individual parts of the classpath, I need to somehow
>scan the classpath and get a list of resources. I could do this manually
>using reflection, but it would probably be far less performant. Another
>alternative wou
On 11/11/14, 1:42 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>That's why I will only merge my stuff to develop after we have released
>the flex-tool-api.
>When using Maven you start paying very detailed attention to stuff like
>this :-)
Technically and legally, you can merge your code into the develop branc
On 11/11/14, 1:40 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>the reason for this is that these artifacts are only created if the maven
>profile "apache-release" is enabled.
>I didn't want to turn that on cause I was a little afraid that doing a
>deploy with enabled apache-release profile could d
Hi Alex,
in order to select individual parts of the classpath, I need to somehow scan
the classpath and get a list of resources. I could do this manually using
reflection, but it would probably be far less performant. Another alternative
would be a Spring library. As I didn't want to bring in a
That's why I will only merge my stuff to develop after we have released the
flex-tool-api.
When using Maven you start paying very detailed attention to stuff like this :-)
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. November 2014 21:59
An: dev@flex.
Hi Alex,
the reason for this is that these artifacts are only created if the maven
profile "apache-release" is enabled.
I didn't want to turn that on cause I was a little afraid that doing a deploy
with enabled apache-release profile could do more than we want it to.
Chris
___
On 11/11/14, 1:25 PM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Another Idea I had that could help prevent classpath clashes would be to
>locate all JS resources in a js (or ".js", or "_js" directory inside the
>swc)
Sounds ok to me.
>
>Currently I somehow need to scann the classpath for resources. I was
>pla
Today I had to start work on the "JS resources on the classpath" feature.
In order to get VF2JS working, I had to somehow provide the closure-library
which is downloaded using maven so the compiler can copy the static resources
to the bin/js-debug directory. So I guess if I get this working with
HI,
Be careful here, we may have issues releasing something (ie the SDK) if it
contains unreleased Apache software. [1] As example of this issue was [2] which
was solved by Thrift making a release.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-sourc
>
> 1) get your thoughts on taking Flexicious out of 3rdparty.xml so that
> their app doesn’t show up scaled? When they reply with a bitmap to use
> like Ardisia did, then we’ll add it to the flex.a.o version which is what
> most folks use anyway.
>
+1 for removing Flexicious out of 3rdparty.xml.
Sorry, somehow hit send. The link is:
https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/flex-tool-api/
Then click on “Last Successful Artifacts”
-Alex
On 11/11/14, 9:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Chris,
>
>I added last successful artifacts to the build and ran a new build. I
>don’t see the oth
Chris,
I added last successful artifacts to the build and ran a new build. I
don’t see the other jars or zip, just one .jar file. See:
On 11/11/14, 8:20 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Chris,
>
>For some reason I can’t get to that link. Might be an issue with
>builds.a.o. I’ll try again when I ge
Chris,
For some reason I can’t get to that link. Might be an issue with
builds.a.o. I’ll try again when I get to the office in 45 minutes.
At least for Ant builds, Jenkins can keep “last successful artifacts” and
we can access them via http. I would like to have the same for this
stuff, and t
On 11/11/14, 2:42 AM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote:
>What about including a single JS file that contains all the code of the
>module into the SWC? This would even be closer to an SWF (which also
>contains all code).
>In Jangaroo packaging, we includ both a single, "minified" file for
>deployment as w
On 11/11/14, 3:37 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>well I don't see a reason why FlashBuilder should have a problem with
>this.
>After all you are setting the command line manually now too (If I'm not
>mistaken)
My concern is about FlashBuilder opening the SWCs to do code-hinting in
t
Hi Alex,
well I don't see a reason why FlashBuilder should have a problem with this.
After all you are setting the command line manually now too (If I'm not
mistaken)
As far as I understood, currently for a Flash build, Falcon is used the normal
way and it therefore works in FB. When building a
What about including a single JS file that contains all the code of the
module into the SWC? This would even be closer to an SWF (which also
contains all code).
In Jangaroo packaging, we includ both a single, "minified" file for
deployment as well as the tree of non-minified JS files for developmen
And for the last requirement:
Here's the link to the last stable build:
https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/flex-tool-api/lastBuild/
So I would be glad for some feedback in order to get that project released so I
can merge my changes in flex-sdk and falcon back to develop (Currently
Well I just adjusted the pom of the module and now I have 4 resulting files:
- flex-tool-api-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar (Containing the actual binary build)
- flex-tool-api-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar (Containing only the sources ...
used by IntelliJ for auto-downloading the sources of third party libs)
-
Hi,
I would be surprised if it wouldn't be accepted as a .jar is a .zip, is it an
immutable legal thing ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Flex SDK implementing flex-tool-api
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:08:18 +
>
>
>
> On 11/10/14, 4:01 PM
28 matches
Mail list logo
