shared this information on G+ :)
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:30 AM, piotrz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have posted information about the release on some Polish forums.
>
> Thanks Justin for the release!
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex PMC
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in contex
Hi,
I have posted information about the release on some Polish forums.
Thanks Justin for the release!
Piotr
-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/ANNOUNCEMENT-Apache-Flex-TourDeFlex-1-1-tp40898p40
Jack,
I am doing something similar, using the built-in .air installers and a
badge page. My build script increments the version number in the -app.xml
config file. (I'm using the built-in update ui classes from AIR.)
When I run a .air file to update a previous installation, I see it delete
the
This is how I see it in ActionScript. FlexJS Charts has ChartDataGroup
which I have as a GraphicsContainer to provide the foundation .
ItemRenderers get created and are added via
chartDataGroup.addElement(itemRenderer). Each itemRenderer instance
creates the graphics it needs and adds that via addE
OK, I'll cook something up.
--peter
On 9/24/14 3:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>Great!
>
>It would be helpful for me to see an example of usage in ActionScript as
>well as MXML, so I can build the APIs accordingly.
>
>Thanks,
>Om
>
>On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
>
>>
Great!
It would be helpful for me to see an example of usage in ActionScript as
well as MXML, so I can build the APIs accordingly.
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Peter Ent wrote:
> I think using is the way to go. Probably need a GraphicsGroup element
> or something like that.
>
I think using is the way to go. Probably need a GraphicsGroup element
or something like that.
--peter
On 9/24/14 1:42 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>I was thinking about more as well. I agree that for the use cases you
>mention with regards to charts, the element would be ideal:
>
>https:
OK, I will ask for approval on legal-discuss.
On 9/24/14 11:25 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, we either use the entire license, or use a pointer, and if we use a
>> pointer, it should follow the template in the how-to. Can you explain
>>why
>> we shouldn't use the pointer template in
Hi,
> IMO, we either use the entire license, or use a pointer, and if we use a
> pointer, it should follow the template in the how-to. Can you explain why
> we shouldn't use the pointer template in the how-to?
Because it meets minimal legal requirements and is not a licensing error.
> Can you e
On 9/24/14 11:12 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> only a portion of the dictionary README is copied into the Squiggly
>>LICENSE.
>
>That's incorrect there's currently a pointer to the long form.
IMO, we either use the entire license, or use a pointer, and if we use a
pointer, it should foll
Hi,
> only a portion of the dictionary README is copied into the Squiggly LICENSE.
That's incorrect there's currently a pointer to the long form.
Justin
On 9/24/14 10:27 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I looked again this morning. Is there something I was supposed to get
>> from that?
>
>Yes look at the license "pointer" for the dictionaries are set up.
>https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/LICENSE_aggregated
I'm sorry,
I was thinking about more as well. I agree that for the use cases you
mention with regards to charts, the element would be ideal:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Element/g
It is the recommended way to contain a group of objects. One advantage
over a nested is that you can ap
Hi,
> I looked again this morning. Is there something I was supposed to get
> from that?
Yes look at the license "pointer" for the dictionaries are set up.
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/LICENSE_aggregated
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
I had a discussion with Alex about the FlexJS chart package and how it makes
use of SVG. For a quick background, the FlexJS chart package makes use of the
core.graphics package created by Om which makes FlexJS charts much more easily
cross-compiled from ActionScript to JavaScript.
At the m
A blog post has been made:
https://blogs.apache.org/flex/entry/apache_flex_tourdeflex_1_1
Official tweet: https://twitter.com/ApacheFlex/status/514824012967342080
Please share link and retweet!
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> The Apache Flex community is ple
I looked again this morning. Is there something I was supposed to get
from that? I did not see anything that would make me think the current
text in flex-utilities/Squiggly/LICENSE is correct. IMO, there are two
choices:
1) go against the folks who prefer short licenses and include the entire
H
On Sep 24, 2014 9:06 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> And something like this perhaps should of been a LAZY to give people in
> different time zones to respond
Justin, this is routine maintenance. It would be impossible to get a
consensus (lazy or otherwise) on every such activity.
Moreover, it i
Nice try starting another discussion about procedure, Justin, but alas: too
little, too late ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> IMO Just leave it offline rather than deleting we way get it working
> someday
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521
My version of Safari claims to have JavaScript profiling. Haven't tried
it, but maybe it would help?
On 9/24/14 3:17 AM, "piotrz" wrote:
>It didn't help Om - I didn't see anything when this option was On. Our
>testers had old Google Chrome v. 32 and pepper Flash Player 12 and had
>freeze in so
And something like this perhaps should of been a LAZY to give people in
different time zones to respond
IMO Just leave it offline rather than deleting we way get it working someday
[ducks and covers]
…
;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> On 24/09/14 16:44, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
>
>> Nope. Executive decision
>>
> Extreme prejudice invoked :-)
>
> Tom
>
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I
On 24/09/14 16:44, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
Nope. Executive decision
Extreme prejudice invoked :-)
Tom
On Sep 24, 2014 8:36 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote:
>
> Do we have to vote before I can press the delete button ?
Nope. Executive decision :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 24/09/14 16:08, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
>> back when we were sti
Nah. Votes are mostly for stuff we release or receive, or procedural issues
related to releases/donations. This is “just” a utility thing, and it will
not (negatively) impact the day to day workings of the project.
So: kill it!
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> Do w
Do we have to vote before I can press the delete button ?
Tom
On 24/09/14 16:08, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us was
a sure way to mess up two builds at same time,
On 24/09/14 16:18, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Even if you are a developer, an online running version with single click access
to the source is better than sitting around for half an hour while the code
compiles or the other stuff you are not interested in.
Only if you assume the first few poin
Hi,
> Even if you are a developer, an online running version with single click
> access to the source is better than sitting around for half an hour while the
> code compiles or the other stuff you are not interested in.
Only if you assume the first few points of this [1] :-)
Justin
1. http:/
On 24/09/14 16:00, Justin Mclean wrote:
I noticed that Apache Open Office spends most of its announcements talking
about the binaries
That would because most people who use Open Office are probably not developers.
Even if you are a developer, an online running version with single click
access
On 24/09/14 16:04, Alex Harui wrote:
Do we have any reason to have two slaves?
Not that I can see.
Tom
Yeah, I wouldn’t mess with two active slaves, I think we tried that way
back when we were still on builds@apache and the only thing it gave us was
a sure way to mess up two builds at same time, every time ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> That slave broke during a j
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex TourDeFlex 1.1.
The Apache Flex Tour De Flex component explorer provides a sample set of working
Apache Flex examples. This release now contains over 300 working examples and
has
several improvements and bug fixes from t
That slave broke during a jenkins upgrade. I was never able to fix it. I
think we can take it down.
Do we have any reason to have two slaves? Because most jobs use
FlashPlayer, we can't run the risk of two jobs hitting their testing phase
at the same time. I'm not sure if we have builds that d
Hi Curtis,
Yes I saw the JIRA notifications. I'm hoping to take a look in a day or
two.
Thanks for your contributions,
-Alex
On 9/24/14 7:10 AM, "Curtis Aube" wrote:
>Alex,
>
>Alright, I added a patch to the same ticket (FLEX-34476). The RTE now
>extends SkinnableComponent and includes a skin
HI,
> I noticed that Apache Open Office spends most of its announcements talking
> about the binaries
That would because most people who use Open Office are probably not developers.
> On the other hand, TDF is getting plenty of traffic so may be just send
> the 1.1 announcement as is, and re-st
Hi,
Did you actually look at the links/reachearch or what currently in Git? In
particular look at the aggregated files from Open Office.
Does what we currently have meet the minimum legal requirements? And if it
doesn't exactly what requirement are we not meeting?
Thanks
Justin
Alex,
Alright, I added a patch to the same ticket (FLEX-34476). The RTE now extends
SkinnableComponent and includes a skin.
I could put it on a new ticket if that is preferable, but I figured I put it
there since that ticket is still open.
Justin Mclean is assigned to the ticket.
Curtis
On Sep
Better than the original ending of the quote, anyway :-P
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> Today is a good day to be the Jenkins wiki page :-)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 24/09/14 13:47, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “M
Today is a good day to be the Jenkins wiki page :-)
Tom
On 24/09/14 13:47, Erik de Bruin wrote:
Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “Mustella”
(which is “mine”):-)
Yes, that one is Alex’s: but it’s referred to as “builds”, not “Mustella”
(which is “mine”) :-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex Build'
> Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for
I've been meaning to ask this for a while, but on the 'Apache Flex
Build' Jenkins, one of the build slaves is off line and has been for a
while.
Should we just delete this node, or is it expected to come back ?
I think that's Alex's box, right ?
--
extravision Signature
*Tom Chiverton* | Lead De
Yes, they are public. We just don’t give out the logins ;-)
EdB
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
> Are both the Jenkin's URLs intended to be public ?
>
> If so I'll update the Jenkins Wiki page. I think it's better to have the
> docs seperate from code ?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On
Are both the Jenkin's URLs intended to be public ?
If so I'll update the Jenkins Wiki page. I think it's better to have the
docs seperate from code ?
Tom
On 23/09/14 18:23, Alex Harui wrote:
I don't know of a place today, but feel free to create one. Or maybe in
this case, update the output
It didn't help Om - I didn't see anything when this option was On. Our
testers had old Google Chrome v. 32 and pepper Flash Player 12 and had
freeze in some other javascript function.
I did add setTimeout in these function and it help reduce a bit these
freeze, but still this is not a solution.
I
45 matches
Mail list logo
