On 6/1/14 6:01 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
You should get an arg count mismatch. By changing the
(!hasFieldName) test on Sort.as line 413 I got the expected result
("Find criteria must contain all sort fields")
>>>
>
>Okay, so this is where I have an issue that I am not sure h
>>>You should get an arg count mismatch. By changing the
>>>(!hasFieldName) test on Sort.as line 413 I got the expected result
>>>("Find criteria must contain all sort fields")
>>
Okay, so this is where I have an issue that I am not sure how we should
resolve. I don't agree with the expected r
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:42 PM, wrote:
> Author: aharui
> Date: Fri May 30 22:42:53 2014
> New Revision: 1598764
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1598764
> Log:
> add server/folder format for ant caching
>
> Modified:
> flex/site/trunk/content/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml
>
> Modifi
It looks like the file
http://flex.apache.org/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml does indeed
mention that 3.1.0 is the latest version.
Alex, you need to revert this change until 3.1.0 is actually released.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 11:32 AM, 周 戈 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I opened Flex
Hi all,
I opened Flex SDK Installer 3.0 just a while ago, and it told me to update to
3.1, and I clicked to update, when it finished downloading, the downloaded
version is still 3.0
I use Mac OS 10.9.3, any idea why it happens?
DarkStone
2014-06-02
