RE: Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

2014-03-30 Thread Maurice Amsellem
>Given the apparently total lack of support from INFRA and builds@a.o for a git >based CI process on a Windows slave Because it's git or because it's windows ? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : lundi 31 mars 2014 08:46 À : dev@flex.apa

RE: Search in Apache Flex Docs?

2014-03-30 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Thank you Alex. There is another topic related to that, that was raised by someone in the mailing list: how to include/link to flashplayer and air player classes in the a.o asdoc? Maurice -Message d'origine- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : lundi 31 mars 2014 05:44

Time to move the CI builds to a "private" VM?

2014-03-30 Thread Erik de Bruin
Hi, Given the apparently total lack of support from INFRA and builds@a.o for a git based CI process on a Windows slave, isn't it time to start thinking about providing our own VM and running the Jenkins jobs off that? I would gladly donate my Azure VM for this purpose, but as Mustella runs on it

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC3

2014-03-30 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/30/14 11:14 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> You can check fluint yourself and compare. >Which tells me nothing. The code was donated to Apache by DP, the person >who checked those 2 files I believe had signed an agreement with DP >handing over the IP so what exactly is the issue here?

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC3

2014-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > You can check fluint yourself and compare. Which tells me nothing. The code was donated to Apache by DP, the person who checked those 2 files I believe had signed an agreement with DP handing over the IP so what exactly is the issue here? Adobe (if they could be bothered) would happy don

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC3

2014-03-30 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/30/14 10:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> I still don't know if we have the header right for: >> >> ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestCaseReport.as >> ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestSuiteReport.as > >So: >a) How can we determine what is corr

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC3

2014-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I still don't know if we have the header right for: > > ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestCaseReport.as > ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestSuiteReport.as So: a) How can we determine what is correct for these files? b) Do you think this a blocker for t

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC2

2014-03-30 Thread Alex Harui
I still don't know if we have the header right for: ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestCaseReport.as ./FlexUnit4CIListener/src/org/flexunit/listeners/TestSuiteReport.as I know Mike says they totally rewrote the CIListener, but it sure looks like Xavi checked these two support fi

Re: Search in Apache Flex Docs?

2014-03-30 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/30/14 1:46 AM, "Maurice Amsellem" wrote: >Is it possible that Adobe shares with us their modified asdoc tools ? I'll look into it. -Alex

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC2

2014-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi And of course this is for RC3 not RC2. Thanks, Justin -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Release-Apache-Flex-FlexUnit-4-2-0-RC2-tp36489p36491.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[VOTE] Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC3

2014-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, This is a Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 release candidate 3 and the first release of FlexUnit under Apache. I'd like to thank Cyril Zadra on all the hard work he did on putting the Flex Unit donation into good shape. Change from RC2 are minimal and include: - Changed to NOTICE and LICENCE fi

[DISCUSSION] Release Apache Flex FlexUnit 4.2.0 RC2

2014-03-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please place all of the discussion here and not in the [VOTE] thread. Thanks, Justin

Re: RTL support in mobile apps

2014-03-30 Thread Harbs
Yes. That's what I expect. My point was to display a cached bitmap in the renderer -- rather than the renderer storing a cache of the content -- which has to get cleared out when the data changes… Harbs On Mar 30, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Maurice Amsellem wrote: > Maybe because of the renderer recycl

RE: RTL support in mobile apps

2014-03-30 Thread Maurice Amsellem
This is already the technique used in many places: - TextInput / TextArea: when the text is not in edit mode, displays a bitmap cache, to ensure smooth scrolling - List item renderers (when cacheAsBitmap is set to true, which is the default on mobile, the whole item renderer is cached as a bitm

Re: AW: Flex on Windows 8

2014-03-30 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
The same is for Windows 8.1. Windows RT based systems (those with an ARM processor instead of an Intel based processor) can only run browser-based Flash/Flex apps. All other versions of Windows for tablets, laptops or desktops support the Flash Player and AIR based applications. Adobe has state

Re: RTL support in mobile apps

2014-03-30 Thread Harbs
Has anyone explored creating "cached" TLF? Rather than re-composing the text every time it's displayed, the composition could be cached as an image and that would be used rather than the live text. Of course, for this to work, something would have to set a flag to indicate that the text reeds to

RE: Search in Apache Flex Docs?

2014-03-30 Thread Maurice Amsellem
Joseph is referring to the appendices section in the ASDOC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ryp97xyeyns37rb/asdoc_appendices.png Unfortunately, I don't think creating a class called CompilerElement would work well, because it will display the mxml-only tags and props as if it was classes and props, wh