The compiler code looks like it has a code path where it gets information
from somewhere and auto-injects a class into the SWF so folks don't have
to bother adding classes like that.
But when we donated the code to Apache we tried to neuter the FB
standard/premium check and broke this code path.
I don't have FDT and would prefer to not have to take the time to work
through this. The main issue that was true for IntelliJ is true here: we
want to be able to run the compiler with different options. That's why
for FB, we are currently having folks use custom launch configs. You can
look at
Hi,
We should hit 2000 installs of 4.12 today.
Justin
Hi,
> According to my stats, Apache Flex (all versions) has been downloaded and
> installed at least 40,670 times since we started keeping track.
>
> Out of this, 39,800 are unique downloads. This gives us a rough idea of
> how many Apache Flex SDK users there are currently.
Real number may be
According to my stats, Apache Flex (all versions) has been downloaded and
installed at least 40,670 times since we started keeping track.
Out of this, 39,800 are unique downloads. This gives us a rough idea of
how many Apache Flex SDK users there are currently.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014
That would mean adding:
private var dep: com.ibm.ilog.elixir.utils::LicenseHandler;
in the main application...
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 mars 2014 01:22
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: ILOG Elixr compatibilit
I think, but I could be wrong , that the error is because " RequiresLicense"
refers to another class.
so this class should be included in the dependencies when compiling the main
program in "Merged into code" mode.
It's not the case currently.
WDYT?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De :
I have added one line in the main program, to force the class to be included,
and the error disappeared.
private var lh: LicenseHandler;
Could you try the same with your licenced version of Elixir ?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Right now the code returns true and looks like it bypasses inserting the
vendors license checker.
On 3/18/14 5:03 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >CompilerAPI.java some
I imported the project and run it with SDK 4.9, got the error
ReferenceError: Error #1065: La variable LicenseHandler n'est pas définie.
So I can have a look now.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : m
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
> > // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
> >license.
> >
> >Perhaps some code was removed as well?
> Yes, in
On Mar 18, 2014 4:45 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
> It really seems that the code is operational.
> RequiresLicense meta is also in the constants:
>
> StandardDefs.java:
> public static final String MD_REQUIRESLICENSE = "RequiresLicense";
>
> BTW, I tried reproducing the issue, so I downloa
On 3/18/14 3:46 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
> // ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
>license.
>
>Perhaps some code was removed as well?
Yes, in hasValidLicense().
It looks like hasValidLicense is not correct and shou
It really seems that the code is operational.
RequiresLicense meta is also in the constants:
StandardDefs.java:
public static final String MD_REQUIRESLICENSE = "RequiresLicense";
BTW, I tried reproducing the issue, so I downloaded a trial version of Elixir
3.5, and built a 10 lines app displ
Very interesting.
I wondered what was the meaning of that strange error.
Thanks Om.
-Message d'origine-
De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 23:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : ILOG Elixr compatibility
I saw a
Hi,
CompilerAPI.java someone added this:
// ToDo: For Apache Flex remove this section since there is no longer a
license.
Perhaps some code was removed as well?
Justin
I saw a note in a recent thread that ILOG Elixr does not work with Apache
Flex 4.12. I was digging into it a bit and realized that there is an open
JIRA ticket here that might help fix the problem [1]
It has to do with the "RequiresLicense" metadata tag not working with
Apache Flex.
Anyone has a
Hi,
IE8 visits have roughly halved form 400/week when it started collecting stats
to about 200/week now.
Justin
I know Om if your linkedin doesn't lie. :)
Btw. Brilliant thoughts Carlos about support AMF in FlexJs :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-AMF-support-tp36013p36028.html
Sen
Hi,
We've had almost 1/2 million visits to the web site of all of those 10% of
visits use IE and 33% of IE visits are IE8 and 5% are IE7. That 17,500 visits
using IE8 and 3,000 visit using IE7!
While I'm guessing this is more developer than users it does give some
indication of what you need
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, piotrz wrote:
> Where it is Om? :) I would like to work there. :)
>
>
A small three letter company which has been around for 100 years ;-)
> Piotr
>
>
>
> -
> Apache Flex Committer
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ap
Where it is Om? :) I would like to work there. :)
Piotr
-
Apache Flex Committer
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-AMF-support-tp36013p36025.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 3/18/14 2:56 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I already contact James and he said:
> >
> >" Feel free to take anything you want from that code. :)"
> Unfortunately, Apache doesn't work that way. If the code is usable as
On 3/18/14 2:56 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>I already contact James and he said:
>
>" Feel free to take anything you want from that code. :)"
Unfortunately, Apache doesn't work that way. If the code is usable as is,
then we can download it like any other dependency, but we should
Hi Alex,
I already contact James and he said:
" Feel free to take anything you want from that code. :)"
regarding IE8 vx AMF that's no color! hehe I'll be dropping IE8 right
now! ;)
As I said IMO Flex is more about AMF than a concrete browser (more if we
're talking about IE8), is huge ben
There is an open JIRA ticket asking for FDT to support FlexJS here [1]
The FDT team pointed out to me on twitter to take a look at their last
comment:
=
I was able to create the FlexJS SDK.
Also I was able to create a test project DataBindingTes
HI,
> The "Getting the code" section only mentions the SDK and TLF repos. We have
> several others.
This file is for the Flex SDK release packages so there's no need (IMO) to
mention the other repos here.
Justin
You may want to send it to users@f.a.o as well.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> If you want to know more about FlexJS, I'll be presenting at two
> conferences this year, ApacheCon in Denver on April 7-9, and at 360|Flex
> in San Jose on May 15-16.
Hi Folks,
If you want to know more about FlexJS, I'll be presenting at two
conferences this year, ApacheCon in Denver on April 7-9, and at 360|Flex
in San Jose on May 15-16. I'll have time before and after my
presentations to answer your questions on FlexJS and try to encourage you
to use it and
Yes, it was, at least for me :-) BTW I’m among the lurkers, looking forward
to being more active in the future and following the lists in the meantime.
2014-03-18 18:17 GMT+01:00 Gordon Smith :
> I think most committers who haven't totally disengaged probably subscribe
> to dev@flex.apache.org a
Last time I looked into it, a true AMF implementation required ByteArray
and thus IE8 wouldn't support it. Is there really a practical, performant
polyfill for IE8? How fast are the modern browser ByteArray
implementations?
Otherwise, I was thinking that AMF would not be supported in all FlexJS
I also have a problem with the statement that "Apache Flex is an application
framework...". You could say "The Apache Flex SDK is an application
framework...". But Apache Flex is more than an SDK.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
On 18/03/14 17:20, Gordon Smith wrote:
The "Getting the code" section only mentions the SDK and TLF repos. We have
several others.
- Gordon
Good spot. Maybe the section should just say something like 'there are
many dependencies, see Wiki" ?
Only one place to keep this stuff seems a good plan
Hi,
today a thread in linked in about FlexJS pointed to AMF support. I've been
making some search and there's some projects out there in google code and
github that brings support for AMF protocol in javascript. For me it's
clear that Flex without AMF will not be Flex ;)
I'd want to ask here if w
The "Getting the code" section only mentions the SDK and TLF repos. We have
several others.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 5:28 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Add CONTRIBUTING file to projects
Hi
I think most committers who haven't totally disengaged probably subscribe to
dev@flex.apache.org and have seen this discussion, so it seems like the points
you wanted to make have already been communicated.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.co
Glad things are getting better.
If the default renderer is just a textfield, then it should handle wordWrap and
variableRowHeight correctly. It is more complex renderers with children that
often need the child tied to the explicitWidth.
I'm not surprised that column spanning has bugs in this k
First of all, sorry for my late response. Alex, you are my hero! This solves
the issue a "little bit". But to be honest, not completely.
Ok for documentation:
Now, in my MXAdvancedDataGridItemRenderer I use:
override public function set explicitWidth(value:Number):void
{
super.explicitW
There's no records for that IP in the logfile table. I think their
session was lost.
The last login to that company was from a totally different netblock
earlier today.
Tom
On 18/03/14 13:00, supp...@extravision.com wrote:
Error Report: March 18, 2014, 1:00:26 PM GMT+00:00
Eleme
Rather obviously, that wasn't meant for you guys !
Sorry for the spam :-)
Tom
"Apache Flex please open a JIRA ticket and attach the code to it."
An example JIRA where this has been done would be helpful.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Work in progress, feedback welcome and will c
Hi,
Work in progress, feedback welcome and will check in soon so people can update.
Apache Flex (Flex)
==
Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash-based
applications for mobile devices, the browser and desktop.
For detailed information a
It's not impossible... but we do have several layers of grouping with a descent
amount of content and having more formatting than plain text is desirable. I'm
easy about it though. We can do both. Link near the top for the wiki and then
post the plain text below it.
-Mark
-Original Me
Is editing the wiki really part of the work flow already? Seems to me like
developers would be more likely to keep the file up to date by having it in
git. But I could be mistaken about that.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Kessler CT
It sounds like a good idea. We could probably keep ours shorter and have a
link to our wiki. Might be easier to keep it up to date.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 9:25 PM
To: flex-...@apache.org
Subject: Ad
Hi,
> I think that's why we should vote sending or not.
In this case a single -1 (veto) is enough to stop the email from happening.
I could put it up for a less restrictive vote but given there no consensus I
don't think that would be fair.
Anyone to send this email to committers themselves bu
>Maybe not now, but around the time we release the initial FlexJS alpha, I
>would like to make sure all of our initial committers know about it.
Are we sure the initial committers know about the progress made on the
"current" Flex?
I mean, why waiting?
> I wonder what would happen if we (or I
I thought we almost reached a consensus with the final rewording.
Too bad you give up, the intention was good.
Before moving to something else, would you mind posting a third and final draft
version with the latest remarks from Tom, Alex, Dave, and Tom C.
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
>
> What's wrong that we can't even agree on a simple email asking people to
>>
> Nothing is wrong. Geeks are just not normally very good at expressing
> themselves and can easily take things the wrong way.
Like you calling me a "Geek"?
You *&%@#&*&#$!
EdB
P.S. :-P (just in case something got
On 18/03/14 05:47, Erik de Bruin wrote:
What's wrong that we can't even agree on a simple email asking people to
Nothing is wrong. Geeks are just not normally very good at expressing
themselves and can easily take things the wrong way.
Tom
Here's the link, for making myself forgiven...
http://www.amazon.fr/Learning-Android-Application-Programming-Applications/dp/0321902939
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 08:59
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re:
Sorry for the confusion.
But you COULD have written a book on Android ;-)
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de OmPrakash
Muppirala
Envoyé : mardi 18 mars 2014 08:56
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Building new skins for Android
Hi,
>> I remember you have been working on a book about Android.
> Not me :-) I think you mean Justin.
Yep that would probably be me - but we do have other authors on the list. I'll
resist the temptation to post a gratuitous link :-)
> Perhaps the Android book author could weigh in here? ;-)
I'
On Mar 18, 2014 12:43 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
wrote:
>
> Thanks Om.
>
> I remember you have been working on a book about Android.
Not me :-) I think you mean Justin.
>
> So please when you start using this feature, could you please confirm
that reading ro.build.version.release prop in system/bui
Thanks Om.
I remember you have been working on a book about Android.
So please when you start using this feature, could you please confirm that
reading ro.build.version.release prop in system/build.prop file is a reliable
way of getting the OS version on Android.
Maurice
-Message d'origi
55 matches
Mail list logo
