Re: git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - FLEX-34053 - MaskedTextInput - Implement windows exclusive 'Insert' key behaviour in MaskedTextInput Component

Hi, Do you want this in the next release? (ie any reason for committing to the develop branch?) Justin

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

Hi, > Which is exactly why we need an Installer for FlexJS in place first before > we release the SDK. Only then we can release the FlexJS SDK. I thought it would be the other way around - but it does seem to be a chicken/egg type problem. > What use is 'releasing' an SDK source kit if no one c

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release. > Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC > to be official. > > > I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested. > In t

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On 2/10/14 4:37 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release. >Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC >to be official. > >> I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested. >In that case we sh

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

Hi, > If we dont have more people testing it, we cannot make a release. Any committer can make a release it just require 3 +1 votes from the PMC to be official. > I don't want to release that has not been reasonably tested. In that case we shouldn't be making available it to the general public.

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

Hi, >> Make it user/human readable basically as it was before. > OK. But realize that for the folks on Linux using Ant they will still see > Ant output. That's fine - they are most likely used to it. Windows developers may not be. Justin

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On 2/10/14 3:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builder that was pointed out several >> weeks ago. >But it's OK with the Adobe Flex 3.0 SDKs? Seems odd to me. If we name it 3.x then FB has other assumption about what SWCs are available. And we certainly

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On 2/10/14 3:53 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >> >>The reasoning is that Flash Builder won't handle version numbers below 4. >> > >Ah, I forgot about Flash Builder and its idiosy

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

On 2/10/14 4:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I'm now confused on what you'd like to see changed. >Make it user/human readable basically as it was before. OK. But realize that for the folks on Linux using Ant they will still see Ant output. -Alex

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

> > > I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following > > the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you think > > we're in violation, please be more specific about what we need to change. > > IMO without an actual release we could be in violation yes.

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

Hi, > I'm now confused on what you'd like to see changed. Make it user/human readable basically as it was before. Thanks, Justin

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

Hi, > Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builder that was pointed out several > weeks ago. But it's OK with the Adobe Flex 3.0 SDKs? Seems odd to me. > I think when you use the new installer to install FlexJS it is following > the same nightly build pattern that we do for the main SDK. If you th

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

One reason we want to release FlexJS with a major version number is that we can announce it via an ASF press release. Remember that they do that only for major releases and not dot releases. We dont want to miss all the press coverage. Thanks, Om On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, OmPrakash Mupp

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

On 2/10/14 3:42 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> For #1, we could just add more "echo" statements and have the installer >> only log echo statements. >That would certainly help. > >> Or to only fix #2, we could tweak some ant target names to make it clear >> they are conditional such as "ai

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > > >It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when > >FlexJS is selected. > In the skin, "Apache Flex" appears to be a bitmap. I don't know what font > we used,

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On 2/10/14 3:34 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and >> 4.0.1. >As it hasn't been officially released or voted on it - I would of >expected a 0.1/0.8/0.9 or the like version number. Yup, it is a limitation from Flash Builde

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

On 2/10/14 3:20 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when >FlexJS is selected. In the skin, "Apache Flex" appears to be a bitmap. I don't know what font we used, etc. If you can generate new bitmaps for FlexJS and maybe Falcon/

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

Hi, > For #1, we could just add more "echo" statements and have the installer > only log echo statements. That would certainly help. > Or to only fix #2, we could tweak some ant target names to make it clear > they are conditional such as "air-setup-win-if-on-windows". Why not just not log them i

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

Hi, > More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and > 4.0.1. As it hasn't been officially released or voted on it - I would of expected a 0.1/0.8/0.9 or the like version number. We also need to be very careful re provide non official release to users. [1] "Under no circ

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

On 2/10/14 3:13 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Because I hope to release the installer soon for FlexJS. >Which id dependant on the 4.12 SDK how? I'd like 4.12 to use the new code paths and that requires changes to installer.xml and .properties files that should go in the release kits. >

Re: [Installer] Version UI for other packages

It should be pretty straightforward add the string "JS" after "flex" when FlexJS is selected. More importantly, I think the first version of FlexJS should be 1.0 and 4.0.1. I dont know where 4.0.1 comes from? What is the reasoning? Perhaps we need a poll for that? Thanks, Om On Mon, Feb 10, 2

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/10/14 2:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >User installing the SDK need a understandable log if something goes wrong > >and they may not be familiar with ant. The log is not just for our use > >IMO. > There's a couple of th

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

Hi, > Because I hope to release the installer soon for FlexJS. Which id dependant on the 4.12 SDK how? > Gee, I hope it isn't several weeks. It's new software only casually tested by a few people. The installer works on multiple platforms and in multiple languages and is the main vector for how

Re: [LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

Hi, > OK, will send poll on users@. Thanks. IMO for something are important as this it probably shouldn't be a LAZY vote as we are voting to remove/stop release a piece of software/support for a platform. While we are providing an alternative means to instal it may not be suitable for everyone

Re: [LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

For me, I only use the SDK on linux for CI builds. Usually on headless(No UI) servers that don't run AIR anyways. With the current AIR installer, it's not possible to install on headless linux computers. The new method with ANT, does support headless installs. Users who do use a graphical interfac

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

On 2/10/14 2:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >> So, I think it is less total work for us to scramble to get the new >> installer out before we ship 4.12, otherwise a 4.12.1 is almost >>guaranteed >> and that seems like more work. >Why do we need a 4.12.1? Why not just integrate the install

Re: [LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

OK, will send poll on users@. On 2/10/14 1:49 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Are we 100% certain that Flex Devs want this? I think we should be asking >wider than just the dev list as it effects users of the SDK and people >have be critical re changes in Linux support in the past. > >-1 from

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

On 2/10/14 2:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >User installing the SDK need a understandable log if something goes wrong >and they may not be familiar with ant. The log is not just for our use >IMO. There's a couple of things about the Ant output: 1) It isn't in complete sentences. 2) It li

[Installer] Version UI for other packages

Hi, The new installer's screen looks like this: http://people.apache.org/~aharui/temp/InstallerScreenShot.pdf One issue with this screen is what to do when installing something other than the Flex SDK. For example, the above screenshot is about to install a FlexJS nightly build, but the logo at

Re: [Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

Hi, User installing the SDK need a understandable log if something goes wrong and they may not be familiar with ant. The log is not just for our use IMO. Not all users would be willing to contact the dev list for help if something goes wrong with the installer (for starter they are unlikely to

Re: [LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

Hi, Are we 100% certain that Flex Devs want this? I think we should be asking wider than just the dev list as it effects users of the SDK and people have be critical re changes in Linux support in the past. -1 from me until that is done. Justin

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

HI, > So, I think it is less total work for us to scramble to get the new > installer out before we ship 4.12, otherwise a 4.12.1 is almost guaranteed > and that seems like more work. Why do we need a 4.12.1? Why not just integrate the installer when we do the next SDK release ie in 3-4 months fo

[Installer] Should the log file be "user friendly"

Hi, The new installer is basically running an approximation of Ant. Therefore the log file is pretty much an exact replica of what our Linux users (or anybody else) will see if they actually use Ant to install the Flex SDK. One person who tried the new installer thinks the log should be more "use

Re: [LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

+1 for this ~Sean class *Sean_Thayne* extends Developer { public $skype = "sthayne23"; public $gTalk = "s...@skyseek.com"; public $url = "www.skyseek.com"; } On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi, > > Tom C has reported

[LAZY][Installer] Retire the Apache Flex Installer for Linux

Hi, Tom C has reported that he's successfully used the ant script on Linux to install Apache Flex 4.12, and has recommended that we go back to only creating InstallApacheFlex.dmg and InstallApacheFlex.exe files and Linux users will be instructed to use Ant. Please voice any objections ASAP. -Ale

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

On 2/9/14 11:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Looks like the last regression issue has been fixed (many thanks to Alex) >- what else is required when we vote on a RC and finally get 4.12 out >there? Obviously we need a complete pass of the mustella tests - but is >there anything else? I kn

RE: Flex Alert box not showing text after single inverted comma

Hi Mark, Just now i found a solution for this problem. i modified it as flashvars.message = ''. This modification resolved the issue. Regards, Krish -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Alert-box-not-showing-text-after-single-inverted-com

RE: Flex Alert box not showing text after single inverted comma

Hi Mark, Just now i found a solution for this problem. i modified it as flashvars.message = ''. This modification resolved the issue. Regards, Krish -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Alert-box-not-showing-text-after-single-inverted-com

RE: Flex Alert box not showing text after single inverted comma

I tried to replace single inverted comma with two inverted commas and even tried to replace with a escape sequence " \' " like message.replace(" ' ", " \' ") or message.replace(" ' ", " ' ' ") but it did not seem working. Thanks, Krish -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-d

RE: Flex Alert box not showing text after single inverted comma

It's it translating the single quote as the start of a string? Would escaping it, or using two in a row make a difference? -Mark -Original Message- From: krishna4960 [mailto:murali.kris...@happiestminds.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:07 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Flex

Flex Alert box not showing text after single inverted comma

Hi friends, I am launching a flex app (swf) from a JSP page. i am sending a value using flashvars like below. flashvars.message = ''; This message consists a single inverted comma in between...ex:- L'impression des pages But when i want to show this message using alert box in flex like Alert.sh

Re: [2/3] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - added target to set Flash Player 13 sec version

Ok, I've made some more changes to the Jenkins script, the builds 'should' be back to normal soon... EdB On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I probably missed some of the discussion about this, but is this correct? > > Does FP 13 beta have the same 'swfversion'

Re: [2/3] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - added target to set Flash Player 13 sec version

Hi, > I probably missed some of the discussion about this, but is this correct? > Does FP 13 beta have the same 'swfversion' as FP 12? That's what the Adobe docs say but they could be wrong. I asked last week and got no answer. Thanks, Justin

Re: Apache Flex 4.12 RC1

Hi, > In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based install > process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main branch now ? Any chance you could provide a patch/commit the changes yourself? Thanks, Justin

Re: [2/3] git commit: [flex-sdk] [refs/heads/develop] - added target to set Flash Player 13 sec version

I probably missed some of the discussion about this, but is this correct? Does FP 13 beta have the same 'swfversion' as FP 12? EdB On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:51 AM, wrote: > added target to set Flash Player 13 sec version > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-sdk/repo > Co

Re: Apache Flex 4.12 RC1

In the read me, I think we should point Linux users at the ant-based install process, I think the relevant Ant tasks are all on the main branch now ? Tom On 08/02/2014 04:36, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, I've just made a RC1 of Apache Flex 4.12.0. It can be found here in a hour or two (how long

Re: Apache Flex 4.12

Hi, I see mismatch in RSLs names. For example flex-config.xml contains advancedgrids_4.12.0.2014-02-09_13-31-27.swf but the file in [Flex SDK]/frameworks/rsls has name advancedgrids_4.12.0.20140209.swf. Alexander On 10.02.2014 11:58, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Looks like the last regression is

Re: Apache Flex 4.12 RC1

Hi, > I checked in the bug fixes I was working on. Are you going to do a big > merge at the end or should we merge each change to release4.12.0 to > develop as we go? Any changes in release need to be merged back into develop as there where our tests run. IMO our branching is a little pointless,