Re: Flex and AIR 4.0

Exactly! So there's "nothing special" about the upcoming releases, something which the original poster seems to imply. I'm trying to prevent another "Flex is dead" outbreak. EdB On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> To put everyone at ease: the full set of Mustella t

Re: Flex and AIR 4.0

Hi, > To put everyone at ease: the full set of Mustella tests (39,000 of > them!) passes on FP 12 and AIR 4. So it only contains bugs we don't know about or are already in JIRA :-) Justin

Re: Flex and AIR 4.0

To put everyone at ease: the full set of Mustella tests (39,000 of them!) passes on FP 12 and AIR 4. That means the SDK works with those versions the same as with all earlier versions. Nothing to see here, move along ;-) EdB On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Alexander Doroshko wrote: > Probab

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Adobe IT said they should do the upgrade, so I'm in waiting mode. In the meantime, I added the ability to switch to an older closure compiler that doesn't seem to be Java 7 dependent. Just rename compiler.jx/local-template.properties to local.properties (and pick a different version if you want).

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #551

I really doubt a change to ComboBox is causing a failure here. This test is just flaky. Mustella needs a better infrastructure for running timing-based tests which the failing one is. On 11/20/13 5:25 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >I've just had it fail here, 3 times in a row so you might

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #551

HI, I've just had it fail here, 3 times in a row so you might want to double check. Try running with -failures several times to see what happens. Thanks, Justin

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #551

Yep, that one tends to fail from time to time. You're all set. On 11/20/13 4:53 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote: >Ran test [1] using 11.8. Unable to reproduce failure > >[1] mini_run.sh >gumbo/components/ListDragDrop/events/SparkDNDList_events.mxml > >-Mark > > >On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, wrot

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #551

Ran test [1] using 11.8. Unable to reproduce failure [1] mini_run.sh gumbo/components/ListDragDrop/events/SparkDNDList_events.mxml -Mark On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [KesslerConsulting] FLEX-33919: Co

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Nevermind, read your email incorrectly. Back to upgrading... On 11/20/13 2:22 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Yeah, it is probably way past time to upgrade. But you are running Java 7 >on OSX 10.6? Why is it working for you? Maybe only the most recent >updates to Java 7 don't work. > >-Alex > >On 1

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Well, we keep the honorary major version 4 and do the actual numbering > with the minor version and the build number. We start with 4.0.1 for > alpha 1 and work our way up to 4.1.0 for the first release. > > I like this but I would prefer it

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Yeah, it is probably way past time to upgrade. But you are running Java 7 on OSX 10.6? Why is it working for you? Maybe only the most recent updates to Java 7 don't work. -Alex On 11/20/13 2:11 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Ah, you're THAT much behind ;-) Well, for after the upgrade: welcome >

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Ah, you're THAT much behind ;-) Well, for after the upgrade: welcome to the 21st century! Kidding, and good luck with your (free, as in beer) upgrade. EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > The Oracle site says that java 7 is not supported on OSX 10.6. > > On 11/20/13 1:57

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

The Oracle site says that java 7 is not supported on OSX 10.6. On 11/20/13 1:57 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >You can have 2 (or more) versions of Java on your system. I have >currently 1.6 (OSX native) and the Oracle JDK 1.7. You set your >preference by setting JAVA_HOME to "$(/usr/libexec/java_h

RE: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status (KMM104570566V84423L0KM) :ppNA

I understand that you are seeking help to fix your PayPal account. We will help you, but the system shows no PayPal account under the email address dev@flex.apache.org. Please send us the email address of the account you want us to fix so we can assist you further. We will then contact you by em

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

>>Falcon got updated to require Java 1.7? Why was that? > FalconJX uses Google Closure which seems to want 1.7. Not sure if Falcon > just also move to 1.7 or not. Why not? Is there a particular issue with Falcon causing us to rely on an old version of Java? EdB -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

You can have 2 (or more) versions of Java on your system. I have currently 1.6 (OSX native) and the Oracle JDK 1.7. You set your preference by setting JAVA_HOME to "$(/usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.7)". EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Update: My main computer is a Mac s

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

Well, we keep the honorary major version 4 and do the actual numbering with the minor version and the build number. We start with 4.0.1 for alpha 1 and work our way up to 4.1.0 for the first release. EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Update: My main computer is a Mac still running 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard). To use Java 7, I will have to upgrade my OSX to 10.7.x. Sounds scary and painful, and I would have pushed back except that 1) I probably will get a new Mac next year, and 2) Oracle premium support for Java 6 ends in December 2

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

On 11/20/13 1:09 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote: >Falcon got updated to require Java 1.7? Why was that? FalconJX uses Google Closure which seems to want 1.7. Not sure if Falcon just also move to 1.7 or not. -Alex > >- Gordon > >-Original Message- >From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

On 11/20/13 12:43 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >> >> >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, >> >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay f

RE: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Falcon got updated to require Java 1.7? Why was that? - Gordon -Original Message- From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:51 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues Yes, the latest thing: since

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

I just synced up and am getting the error. I'm now off to see what it takes to switch to Java 7. On 11/20/13 12:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >I haven't run this through Flash Builder yet... And I spent the >afternoon tweaking (hacking more like) my Mac to get it to install and >accept Java 7.

Re: [FLEXJS] Overlays and SWC Refactoring

On Nov 19, 2013 12:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 11/18/13 12:19 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > >I'm clear. Sounds awesome! Let me know when the ant script is done, > >I'll work it into a Jenkins job so we get a fresh overlay for each > >commit to either Falcon(Jx) or FlexJS. Another advan

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

I haven't run this through Flash Builder yet... And I spent the afternoon tweaking (hacking more like) my Mac to get it to install and accept Java 7. I don't like this one bit, but i only just now hooked myself up to the Closure release list, so I had no early warning. I think things will settle d

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

I've installed Java 1.7.0_45 and set JAVA_HOME to the location reported by java_home, then built flex-falcon and installed it into the FlexJS overlay. I get the same error. So then I changed the Java preferences for Flash Builder but get same error. Do the external Flash Builder tools Alex created

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

Appears to work, cheers. Tom On 20/11/2013 17:29, Alex Harui wrote: OK, try editing the wiki. On 11/20/13 8:13 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: What's your wiki account id? Good question :-) Err... tchiverton ? Tom __ This em

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

OK, try editing the wiki. On 11/20/13 8:13 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: > > What's your wiki account id? > >Good question :-) > >Err... tchiverton ? > >Tom

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

Yes, the latest thing: since the last compiler update we need Java 1.7, I'm afraid. EdB On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Peter Ent wrote: > I rebuilt the compiler and installed it into the FlexJS overlay as I've > done before. Building the AS version of my test works fine. Building with > Falc

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

> What's your wiki account id? Good question :-) Err... tchiverton ? Tom

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

On 11/20/13 1:36 AM, "Tom Chiverton" wrote: >On 20/11/2013 09:25, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > > I think it's quite a hurdle so some clear docs are a good start. > >> No argument there. > >If someone grants my user create pages permission on the Wiki I'll put >something under Guides and Reference

Re: [FALCONJX] [FLEXJS] AS to JS compilation issues

I rebuilt the compiler and installed it into the FlexJS overlay as I've done before. Building the AS version of my test works fine. Building with Falcon JX now gives me this console output: using FlashBuilder Project Files FlashBuilder settings: -locale en_US -source-path+=/Users/pent/

Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

I noticed now that there was a problem with the mount point of the network share (sometimes OSX forget to remove the mount point folders, and then recreate them using -1, -2 suffixes), so it is possible that the new deployer was failing for this reason (no way to tell for sure). Sorry for the noise

Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

Anyway, the “legacy” deployer worked fine, and you could always do a simple file copy, so this is not a real issue :) just sorry I couldn’t help to test the new in-vm one. 2013/11/20 christofer.d...@c-ware.de > Well I guess you don't use any sort of deployer in that case ;-) > > ___

AW: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

Well I guess you don't use any sort of deployer in that case ;-) Von: Avi Kessner [akess...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 13:27 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status It's not really an edge cas

Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

It's not really an edge case. In my company we just copy pasted the repository onto local drives :) brought to you by the letters A, V, and I and the number 47 On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Cosma Colanicchia wrote: > I’m now trying to deploy the artifacts to a shared repository with the > i

AW: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

Ok ... so I didn't think there was such a think as a file-accessible remote maven repository. You never stop learning ;-) But I'll have a look at this case. Chris Von: Cosma Colanicchia [cosma...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. November 2013 11:55 An:

Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

I’m now trying to deploy the artifacts to a shared repository with the in-vm deployer. Our repository is not exposed via HTTP, instead is accessed as a network share using a file://... repository URL. The new deployer fail instantly with an ArtifactTransferException. Probably this is an edge case

Re: AW: Questions about current mavenizer status

I have created the FDKs for 4.11 (with the latest AIR and FP versions, and all options checked) from Windows and from Mac, and tried to diff out the two folders. I see that there are a lot of changes, some of which are expected: - /bin (adl vs adl.exe, adt vs adt.exe) - /android/lib binaries (aa

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

On 20/11/2013 09:25, Justin Mclean wrote: > > I think it's quite a hurdle so some clear docs are a good start. No argument there. If someone grants my user create pages permission on the Wiki I'll put something under Guides and Reference to start with. That would be the best way forward,

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

Hi, > I think it's quite a hurdle so some clear docs are a good start. No argument there. > Sadly, we can't just supply a .tgz because the SDK requires AIR that we can't > redistribute. Unless we had a redistribution license (not impossible btw). > We could package the existing Flex installer i

Re: SDK Installer on Linux - status report

On 19/11/2013 20:46, Justin Mclean wrote: But you can download and install the AIR runtime from here right? Yes; But it wont work without creating additional symbolic links. If all you want is to install the SDK, and you are not going to building an AIR app, I think it's quite a hurdle so some