I hope you will subtly point out that you'll be talking about FlexJS,
not Flex.js ;-)
Branding matters!
EdB
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> The folks who run the 360|Stack Conference (formerly 360|Flex Conference)
> have asked me to do a free web seminar on
+1 binding
Win64 bits Installed the nightly built Apache Flex 4.11.0 FP 11.9 AIR 3.9
en_US -> ok
FB Integration -> ok
Note: would be nice if the required files to download would be pre-selected
by default.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
E
Hi,
+1 binding
Tested on OSX selected FP 11.9/AIR 3.9 en_AU locale
- Compiles
- LICENSE, README, NOTICE, RELEASE_NOTES all OK
- rat report give 0 unknown licenses
- MD5 hash and sigs all good (but see below)
Notes:
- Probably should default to 11.9/3.9 not 11.8/3.8
- README refer to 3.0 config
+1
tar.gz signature matches
Build script succeeded on OSX
Results properly installed a working SDK in FB 4.7.
-Alex
On 10/21/13 9:08 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>+1
>
>Downloads SDK and works as expected.
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please v
Hi Pratyoosh,
Thanks for working on this stuff, especially the modal and dragging beads.
I got a chance to look through your popup class. It looks pretty good to
me, especially for those who are used to the current Flex SDKs'
PopUpManager. I did wonder whether PopUp should inherit from Panel.
+1
Downloads SDK and works as expected.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be
> released.
>
> Issues addressed in this release:
> - OSMF 2.0 support
>
> The source distributions for Windows and Mac are
+1 (binding)
Win7 64bit Air client 3.9
* Installed successfully
* SDK compiled successful test applications.
-Mark
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be
> released.
>
> Issues addressed in this rele
Hi,
> I am waiting for the mirrors to propagate. Can someone confirm that we are
> good to point to the release binaries?
Looks like 80%+ should have it now and it's into the long tail - look at the
bottom of http://www.apache.org/mirrors/.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> We change the flex-config file directly which is what the compiler and IDE
> looks at. I believe the build.properties file does not matter once the SDK
> has been converted for use with an IDE.
Correct. Unless you recompile it again.
Justin
On Oct 21, 2013 5:53 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>
> In the build.properties it still shows the "playerglobal.version = 11.1"
> even though the installer says it's default was 11.8?
We change the flex-config file directly which is what the compiler and IDE
looks at. I believe the build.properties
On Oct 21, 2013 5:49 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
>
> Can you get it to show the release of 4.11 now since it was voted through?
I am waiting for the mirrors to propagate. Can someone confirm that we are
good to point to the release binaries?
> Other than that I think I'm good so far.
>
> -Mark
>
In the build.properties it still shows the "playerglobal.version = 11.1"
even though the installer says it's default was 11.8?
-Mark
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Fixed. Please close and re-open the Installer to see the changed SDK
> order.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
Fixed. Please close and re-open the Installer to see the changed SDK
order.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:45 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> You mean by default? I think it should show 4.11 RC2 by default. I will
> make this change now.
>
> It should show 4.9.1 and 4.10 as the availa
Can you get it to show the release of 4.11 now since it was voted through?
Other than that I think I'm good so far.
-Mark
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> You mean by default? I think it should show 4.11 RC2 by default. I will
> make this change now.
>
> It should
You mean by default? I think it should show 4.11 RC2 by default. I will
make this change now.
It should show 4.9.1 and 4.10 as the available options too.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Mark Kessler
wrote:
> Is is supposed to show the SDK 4.10?
>
> -Mark
>
Is is supposed to show the SDK 4.10?
-Mark
bump...
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested with with Flex 4.11 RC2
> SDK looks good
> osmf 2.0 swc downloads fine
> osmf_4.11.0.20131017.swf created in frameworks/rsls folder
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Justin Mclean
Hi,
There a few outstanding pull requests.
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pulls
Do we know which ones have been resolved?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Folks,
The folks who run the 360|Stack Conference (formerly 360|Flex Conference)
have asked me to do a free web seminar on FlexJS this Wednesday, 10/23.
See the invite at [1]. I plan to cover what FlexJS is, show the latest
demo, and look under the hood at how it works.
[1] https://360stackwe
Device font rendering is not guaranteed across platforms. On Mac, for example,
the glyphs may be taller or wider than they are on Windows which can affect the
word-wrapping.Anti-aliasing is affected by ControlPanel settings on
Windows. If that's ok with you, you'll save on SWF size and ren
Hi,
> The zip doesn't contain local-template.properties at all. is that planned?
It's not part of the release as it not needed to compile the SDK.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Don't worry about it - i'll stick to JDK1.6
OK. BTW I used 1.7 to compile the recent 4.11 release candidates including
ASdocs.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Assuming git branch release4.11.0 is the RC, i spotted a very minor error in
> local-template.properties; release and release.version properties set to
> 4.10.0
Thanks for spotting that, the build uses build.properties so there no major
issue there but yes it should be 4.11.
Justin
Hi Pratyoosh,
I will take a look this evening.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 10/21/13 1:46 PM, "Sharma, Pratyoosh"
wrote:
>Made updates for a popup implementation, it supports arbitrary popup
>content similar to flex.
>
>Example
>var demoPopUp:PopUp =
>PopUp.createPopUp(PopupContent
Hi Justin,
Don't worry about it - i'll stick to JDK1.6
On 21/10/2013 22:20, Justin Mclean wrote:
HI,
*E:\Projects\Apache Flex SDK\Apache
Flex\flex-sdk\modules\thirdparty\velocity\build\build.xml
(212:34)'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last;
set to false fo
HI,
> *E:\Projects\Apache Flex SDK\Apache
> Flex\flex-sdk\modules\thirdparty\velocity\build\build.xml
> (212:34)'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to
> build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds**
That's just a warning I believe.
I may of missed it in the thread but w
Made updates for a popup implementation, it supports arbitrary popup content
similar to flex.
Example
var demoPopUp:PopUp =
PopUp.createPopUp(PopupContent,this,"Component Popup Test", true, true);
demoPopUp.centrePopup();
Supports modal behavior &
+1 (binding)
Tested with with Flex 4.11 RC2
SDK looks good
osmf 2.0 swc downloads fine
osmf_4.11.0.20131017.swf created in frameworks/rsls folder
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be
> rele
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Maurice Amsellem <
maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
> Hi, I have just updated spark CalloutButton as promised (sorry for the
> delay):
>
> - added "open on rollover" behavior to CalloutButton that was in
> experimental CalloutButton.
>
> It's implemented as a
Mustella tests are in mustella/tests/spark/components/CalloutButton
BTW, I noticed that the CalloutButton horizontal/vertical position combinations
below were behaving differently than the others:
- before/before
- end/end
- end/middle
- end/start
- middle/end
-middle/middle
- middle/start
Pre
Hi, I have just updated spark CalloutButton as promised (sorry for the delay):
- added "open on rollover" behavior to CalloutButton that was in experimental
CalloutButton.
It's implemented as a style, and not as a property, so that it can exist only
on desktop, not on mobile.
=> new "spark onl
my last word on the subject ;) ... asdocs build successfully when i use
4.10 (apache git master branch)
On 21/10/2013 17:50, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
That is going to be difficult to help you.
It's probably one of the asdoc tools/libs that is missing or incorrectly build,
or one of the environ
The zip doesn't contain local-template.properties at all. is that planned?
On 21/10/2013 19:22, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Lee, follow the link below to get the official 4.11RC2:
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.11.0/rc2/
This link was pr
Well it builds using JDK1.6, and i don't need the Flash Integration Kit
to contribute patches (right?), so i'll just stick with that.
On 21/10/2013 19:40, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
The only thing I can think of is some of the compilation scripts really
don't like paths with spaces in them. I
The only thing I can think of is some of the compilation scripts really
don't like paths with spaces in them. I've run across a bunch of weird
errors when that was the case. Can you try moving them around so you don't
have "Apache Flex" rather "Flex" or something along those lines to help the
com
Lee, follow the link below to get the official 4.11RC2:
The release candidate can be found here;
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.11.0/rc2/
This link was provided in the initial "[VOTE] Apache Flex 4.11.0 release
candidate 2 " email by Justin McLean.
Maurice
-Message d'o
..and i'd suggest adding "air.version" to local-template.properties too
(for completeness)
On 21/10/2013 19:14, Lee Burrows wrote:
Assuming git branch release4.11.0 is the RC, i spotted a very minor
error in local-template.properties; release and release.version
properties set to 4.10.0
--
Le
Assuming git branch release4.11.0 is the RC, i spotted a very minor
error in local-template.properties; release and release.version
properties set to 4.10.0
--
Lee Burrows
ActionScripter
That is going to be difficult to help you.
It's probably one of the asdoc tools/libs that is missing or incorrectly build,
or one of the environments variables that is not correctly set.
Did you set all the environments variables required for the build ?
# AIR_HOME
# FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
#
I included everything there was (except include_examples)
On 21/10/2013 17:26, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Thanks.
Since it contains static files only, can you also send topLevel.xml file
located at the root of asdoc-output.
Maurice
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé :
Thanks.
Since it contains static files only, can you also send topLevel.xml file
located at the root of asdoc-output.
Maurice
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 18:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] 4.11.0 RC 2 ASDocs
zip atta
link:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1GdpV1EmUDJN1ExTUpDLWhGNU0/edit?usp=sharing
From: miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com
To: us...@flex.apache.org; dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Different Font result when using embed and not
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:31:43 +0100
In the attachment i have a projec
Can you add the following to the ant task:
keep-xml="true"
so that the intermediary files are not deleted.
Then zip and share asdoc-output/tempdita folder
Thanks
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 17:08
In the attachment i have a project test.
In this project test i am using 3 types of fonts: embed by swf (using the
fntswf utility), embed by css and not embed.
And i have 2 different results
Embed by swf and by CSS i have the same result and not embed gives another
result.
Now start the true pro
Just reposting with new subject to separate conversations...
On 21/10/2013 16:00, Lee Burrows wrote:
For JDK1.7:
*E:\Projects\Apache Flex SDK\Apache
Flex\flex-sdk\modules\thirdparty\velocity\build\build.xml
(212:34)'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to
build.sysclasspath=last; set
Just reposting with new subject to separate conversations...
On 21/10/2013 16:03, Lee Burrows wrote:
Sorry, that was for the asdocs build - it seems to be doing everything
correctly (including temporary creation of tempdita folder) but no
files (other than examples) exist at the end of the p
Sorry, that was for the asdocs build - it seems to be doing everything
correctly (including temporary creation of tempdita folder) but no files
(other than examples) exist at the end of the process.
On 21/10/2013 15:53, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Lee wrote:
Ant build completed successfully in 5m
For JDK1.7:
*E:\Projects\Apache Flex SDK\Apache
Flex\flex-sdk\modules\thirdparty\velocity\build\build.xml
(212:34)'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to
build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds**
**Compiling 196 source files to E:\Projects\Apache Flex SDK\Apache
Fle
Lee wrote:
> Ant build completed successfully in 5m 12s at 21/10/13 13:52
SDK usually takes longer for a clean build.
Maybe it was not that successful...
Can you try using the SDK
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 oct
What errors are you getting specifically?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Lee Burrows
wrote:
> Yes, it's there.
>
> Don't worry too much about it; if its working for most people, i assume
> its a problem on my end. I'm also having issues with sdk build (cant build
> with JDK 1.7, cant include f
How many times have you tried? That download tends to be flaky.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Hi,
I have tried build 4.11 SDK RC2 on Windows and got the following error while
downloading https://java.net/downloads/javacc/javacc-5.0.tar.g
Hi,
I have tried build 4.11 SDK RC2 on Windows and got the following error while
downloading https://java.net/downloads/javacc/javacc-5.0.tar.gz.
D:\ApacheFlex\dist\sdk_411_RC2\sdk_src\modules\downloads.xml:162:
javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException:
PK
Yes, it's there.
Don't worry too much about it; if its working for most people, i assume
its a problem on my end. I'm also having issues with sdk build (cant
build with JDK 1.7, cant include flash integration kit) and the
frustration has removed my interest in attempting some bug fixes for now
Lee,
Can you check that you have flexTasks.jar in sdk/lib/ directory?
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 15:00
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.11.0 RC 2
I have already done a f
I have already done a full sdk build and ant does report success for
asdocs build:
Ant build completed successfully in 5m 12s at 21/10/13 13:52
But the only contents in asdoc-output folder are the examples.
FYI, i am using github develop branch, not apache develop branch.
On 21/10/2013 13:4
Maybe we could add that information to our ASDOC area in our wiki. Quick blurb
and the commands run.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 8:44 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex
Hi,
Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 2.7 to be
released.
Issues addressed in this release:
- OSMF 2.0 support
The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc1/
The binary distributions as a con
>I tried generating ASdocs (with asdoc target in main build file).
Ok, so the lib directory is probably missing in your configuration.
It's generated when running the full SDK build.
Did you run a full build before building the asdocs, or did you run asdoc build
directly?
Maurice
-Message
>I tried generating ASdocs (with asdoc target in main build file).
FI, ASDOC Build work on the develop branch
Checking differences with the release
-Message d'origine-
De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 14:37
À : dev@flex.apache.org
O
Yeah, that's easy then - every one just needs to do
http://people.apache.org/foaf/index.html
As a second step we can then generate our own map from the same repository.
Tom
On 21/10/2013 13:27, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Thanks Justin for the link .
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Jus
Same. It says "could not load flexTasks.task", so basically asdocs fails at
the beginning .
I am checking what's wrong...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Lee Burrows [mailto:subscripti...@leeburrows.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 14:22
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [DISC
Thanks Justin for the link .
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 14:10
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Committers and PMC locations
Hi,
Committers and PMC member can set it if they want in several places li
Hi,
RC2 is now the official Apache Flex 4.11 release with 7 +1 binding votes.
+1 bindng
Justin Mclean
Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Frédéric THOMAS
Alex Harui
Igor Costa
Mark Kessler
Erik de Bruin
And no other votes.
Thanks to everyone who took the took to time to test out the release candidates.
Just
I tried generating ASdocs (with asdoc target in main build file).
The build runs without errors but the output only consists of an
"include_examples" folder (and subfolders) - there are none of the usual
asdocs files.
Anyone else experiencing this?
On 21/10/2013 07:03, Frédéric THOMAS wro
Hi,
Committers and PMC member can set it if they want in several places like FOAF
or in JIRA and in the Apache committer map.
http://people.apache.org/map.html
Actually I'm in the Narnia or the Carmen Sandiego time zone :-)
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Sebastian,
My availabilities for a meeting are the following:
Mon-Fri 9pm-12am CET
Sat-Sun 2pm-12am CET.
Meeting place :
Of course, it would be much more friendly to meet for real at a café, or
something, if we are at close locations.
Otherwise, internet phone/video call would be enough f
Yes, of course, or maybe even on the ApacheFlex team page...
Maurice
-Message d'origine-
De : Tom Chiverton [mailto:t...@extravision.com]
Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2013 11:04
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Committers and PMC locations
Shouldn't this be on the Wiki or somewhere it'
Could be on the web site / team page
Frédéric THOMAS
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:03:41 +0100
> From: t...@extravision.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Committers and PMC locations
>
> Shouldn't this be on the Wiki or somewhere it'll be easier to find and
> update in future ?
>
> T
Shouldn't this be on the Wiki or somewhere it'll be easier to find and
update in future ?
Tom
On 21/10/2013 09:34, Maurice Amsellem wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to indicate your usual location and time zone, so that we know
when to wait for answers.
- Maurice Amsellem, Europe/Paris
Hi,
Is it possible to indicate your usual location and time zone, so that we know
when to wait for answers.
- Maurice Amsellem, Europe/Paris
Maurice
Hi,
> Justin, can you please make the Mac and Linux builds and upload them as
> well?
>
> I am off to bed now, so maybe you can start the vote as well?
Yep can get to that in the next hour or two - unless someone else want's to do
it?
Justin
I have checked in the source kit and windows binaries of Installer RC1
here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/2.7/rc1/
Justin, can you please make the Mac and Linux builds and upload them as
well?
I am off to bed now, so maybe you can start the vote as well? If not, I
can s
72 matches
Mail list logo
