[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-26325.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Added externalToString method to set
On 5/6/13 6:19 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> On May 6, 2013 2:17 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> If you see a stack trace with a function ending with _c() or _i(), that's
> a
>> sign that the old FB MXMLC compiler was the last thing to compile that SWF
>> and you have to run the external
On May 6, 2013 2:17 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> If you see a stack trace with a function ending with _c() or _i(), that's
a
> sign that the old FB MXMLC compiler was the last thing to compile that SWF
> and you have to run the external tool again.
>
> -Alex
I got this same error as well. I was c
Was just curious since it was swept up in the search of Critical and major
issues :P
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's marked as a feature request not a bug so I'd leave as major but no
> objections if it was moved to minor.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Just FYI, Apache JIRA has a default priority of 'Major' when a new
issue/bug is created. It kind of makes sense because JIRA is being safe by
selecting the middle value from the list:
Blocker > Critical > Major > Minor > Trivial
It is easy to not pause and give the priority a thought when filing
Hi,
It's marked as a feature request not a bug so I'd leave as major but no
objections if it was moved to minor.
Thanks,
Justin
On 5/6/13 5:09 PM, "Mark Kessler" wrote:
> Do we ever get feature requests that have a high criticality but people
> don't implement it or don't agree with it?
Yup, you are not obligated to implement something if you don't think it is
for the greater good of the project and community.
> I mean
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> OK.
>
> Just wondering, if a committer already has a github account under a
> different email address, what do they do?
>
> -Alex
>
GitHub lets you add multiple emails to the github account. It will be up
to the committer to switch the 'defaul
Do we ever get feature requests that have a high criticality but people
don't implement it or don't agree with it? I mean what happens to the
issues. Do we just keep the in Jira for life or is there an action that
should be performed?
I was looking at an issue[1] and was thinking it sounded like
Just wanted to note that I think this proposal alleviates my concerns about
using github for whiteboards. If I can find time I'm going to search other
apache archives to see if there are other things we need to consider. But for
now I feel like this supports apache's desires for open development
OK.
Just wondering, if a committer already has a github account under a
different email address, what do they do?
-Alex
On 5/6/13 4:03 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> Om,
>>
>> Can you update the proposal as to whether you have to u
>
>
> If this my my code I'd remove the Object altogether and make a range class
> to pass in - that way you don't need any checks and it would be faster.
>
+1 to this. It always bugged me that I have to send a generic object as a
function parameter. If we have a typed object, we get the checks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean reassigned FLEX-26325:
Assignee: Justin Mclean (was: Adobe JIRA)
> RemoteObject logs too eagerly all sent mes
Hi,
> FWIW, at Adobe, the philosophy was to not do much input checking.
For a method that's called a lot/performance critical I agree. In this case it
was already doing a check and doing it incorrectly so I see no harm.
If this my my code I'd remove the Object altogether and make a range class t
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Om,
>
> Can you update the proposal as to whether you have to use your a.o email or
> if allowing aliases works?
>
> -Alex
>
>
I have posted the proposal here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Proposal+-+Github+based+Whiteboard
Om,
Can you update the proposal as to whether you have to use your a.o email or
if allowing aliases works?
-Alex
On 5/6/13 3:35 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
> Any other thoughts regarding this process?
>
> If not, I would like to test this workflow with a couple of volunteer
> committers
Any other thoughts regarding this process?
If not, I would like to test this workflow with a couple of volunteer
committers. Anyone wants to volunteer? :-)
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/2/13 6:21 PM, "Dasa Paddock" wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>> 6. The com
If you see a stack trace with a function ending with _c() or _i(), that's a
sign that the old FB MXMLC compiler was the last thing to compile that SWF
and you have to run the external tool again.
-Alex
On 5/6/13 1:05 PM, "Peter Ent" wrote:
> I the FlexJSTest_CreateJS sample working in both Acti
I the FlexJSTest_CreateJS sample working in both ActionScript and
JavaScript. I only have the FlexJSTest_HTML5 working in JavaScript;
ActionScript gives me an RTE, but I'm looking into it.
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null
object reference.
at
mx.styles:
On 5/6/13 9:28 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Which Java JDK were you using? I seem to remember that policy changing in
> the 1.7 load...
>
> BTW, I had the issue under Windows 7,x64,JDK 1.7
Ok, could be. I'm on 1.6.
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
I'm on a Mac and had this problem. OSX 10.8; Java version 1.6.0_45.
EdB
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Seems like people on Mac doesn't have this problem?
>
> El lunes, 6 de mayo de 2013, Alex Harui escribió:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/6/13 8:19 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" >
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-26325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13649861#comment-13649861
]
William Draï commented on FLEX-26325:
-
Hi Justin,
Would you agree to implement the th
Which Java JDK were you using? I seem to remember that policy changing in
the 1.7 load...
BTW, I had the issue under Windows 7,x64,JDK 1.7
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/6/13 8:19 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>
> > I think the issue was that the http eng
FWIW, at Adobe, the philosophy was to not do much input checking.
"Garbage-in, Garbage Out". If you pass in garbage, it is ok to get an
exception thrown back at you. Theoretically, folks debug their code to the
point where it won't need these checks in production. Sure, any individual
check is s
Seems like people on Mac doesn't have this problem?
El lunes, 6 de mayo de 2013, Alex Harui escribió:
>
>
>
> On 5/6/13 8:19 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" >
> wrote:
>
> > I think the issue was that the http engine within ANT didn't like the
> > protocol change -- HTTPS -> HTTP. Thanks for getting
Hi peter,
Changes are already integrated. Erik made an update some hours ago to make
it work with the goof.events refactor. As he noticed in the update got
message example is showing some controls but it need some more changes to
fix all functionality.
El lunes, 6 de mayo de 2013, Peter Ent escr
Nick is right, but I don't understand why you are getting these files to
show up in rat. Are those 3 targets the equivalent of "ant release"?
Otherwise, it isn't a fair test as the "release" target might otherwise
delete those files (since they are binaries and shouldn't be in a source
package).
On 5/6/13 8:19 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> I think the issue was that the http engine within ANT didn't like the
> protocol change -- HTTPS -> HTTP. Thanks for getting the correct address
> in there :)
I agree that was the issue, but I still don't understand why my computer
doesn't ca
I think the issue was that the http engine within ANT didn't like the
protocol change -- HTTPS -> HTTP. Thanks for getting the correct address
in there :)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I was able to reproduce your situation.
>
> I updated the build script to use the late
I think we have a list of "Excluded" files so the RAT report ignores files
that can't or shouldn't have the license header in them. According to my
IDE, those files are listed on lines 1668:1701 in the build.xml (ANT
builder). We don't add the license header to binaries such as SWF,
because, well
I had the same problem as Gordon on OSX, and changing the URL to use
HTTPS solved it for me as well. I will commit the new URL to develop.
EdB
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I left my windows machine at the office. I think I'm on 1.8 or so. But I
> do recall documentatio
If I run:
ant main
ant source-package
ant rat-check
I get a rat.report with 5 unapproved licenses:
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/temp/frameworks/javascript/fabridge/samples/EmptySwf.swf
/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-sdk/temp/frameworks/javascript/fabridge/sample
Never one to shy away from a daunting task, I've taken on the 'missing
headers' issue...
I can run 'ant release' successfully (after fixing the JavaCC URL) and
get a nice 'rat.report'. I've fixed the headers in the
'experimental/bundles' property files that ant reports.
Running 'ant release' take
Thanks Carlos. I look forward to integrating your changes and to see how
you did it.
--peter
On 5/2/13 8:07 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>I finaly get it working, so I merged the checkbox creates control in
>develop.
>
>For me this was more than an exercise to learn createjs and other
Robin van Ee created FLEX-33540:
---
Summary: Auto embed assets
Key: FLEX-33540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33540
Project: Apache Flex
Issue Type: New Feature
Compone
I do some bug work on those major / critical ones later.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2013 11:59 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Making an new Apache Flex release
Hi,
Develop and trunk are drifting further apart a
36 matches
Mail list logo
