> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Well, hopefully, there will be lots of committers contributing to the
FlexJS
> framework. IMO, all of them should be writing tests. One of these days
we
> will build out a test suite for FlexJS, probably using something l
Yup, refactoring an active code base is never fun. I'm about to shut it
down for tonight. I'll check back in about 7 hours.
On 5/3/13 10:42 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> I just woke up, I'll look at it after breakfast ;-)
>
> It looks to be a small change, but it's confusing to have to look a
I just woke up, I'll look at it after breakfast ;-)
It looks to be a small change, but it's confusing to have to look at
three sources (original, 'goog.events' and Carlos'), so I expect some
errors to creep into the code after this merge. Shouldn't be too big
of a deal to fix the ones we find, tho
Should hopefully be a small change. How is it going? Did you get the
publisher to work again?
On 5/3/13 10:23 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Thanks for waiting with this commit till after I land the
> 'goog.events' branch :-(
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Carlos Rovira
>
Hi,
> I don't belong here. Please remove me from this mailing list.
> My emailID is sujith...@gmail.com.
If you send a blank email to dev-unsubscr...@flex.apache.org it will
unsubscribe from the list.
Alternatively setting up a few email filters to place Apache Flex or Apache
JIRA emails into
Thanks for waiting with this commit till after I land the
'goog.events' branch :-(
EdB
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> fixed in my latest commit, not JS and SWF works ok. Things look better at
> daylight ;).
> Only JS side need to improve applicationModel t
I don't belong here. Please remove me from this mailing list.
My emailID is sujith...@gmail.com.
I am getting lot of mails and missing very important mails.
Thanks,
Sujith
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Justin Mclean (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27905?p
On 5/3/13 4:41 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Right now it seems a convenient environment now that I'm entering this
> stuff...I have builds for various examples, and al is working right but
> HTML5 example in JS mode, that is failing for me with the following error:
>
> Finding file for class
Hi Mark,
My personal preference is for #2, but only slightly. IMO, fewer APIs are
better as long as they are discoverable, but you can go with #1 if you want.
My only thought was that it appears that at least internally most of the
code could be in a setButtonEnabled() method and even the array v
This is an off topic question but if anyone is planning on attending Adobe Max
next week and would like to meet up at the event please let me know. It would
be great sync up with and talk about the *BEST* RIA framework around!!!
Cheers!
Russ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-33341:
-
Labels: VectorCollection performance (was: VectorCollection)
> VectorCollection becomes prog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-27905:
-
Labels: performance (was: )
> Adding/Removing children to same parents sometimes causes unne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-28921:
-
Labels: easyfix (was: )
> SkinnableTextBase maxChars should be bindable.
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-12736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-12736:
-
Labels: performance (was: )
> ListViewCollection.sort exponentially slower than Array.sort
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-27291:
-
Labels: performance (was: )
> Redundant code in Scroller: orientation change handler
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-0?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-0:
-
Labels: performance (was: )
> BindabilityInfo and DescribeTypeCache Memoization
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-27712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-27712:
-
Labels: performance (was: )
> Check for listeners before dispatching them
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-33282:
-
Labels: perfomance (was: )
> Performance issue with multiple item renderers
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-23466.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Can't fix caching RSL frameworks is an Flash Player feature. Apache Flex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648975#comment-13648975
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-23466:
--
Interesting enough this was added (caching fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-23466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-23466:
-
Description:
I have been spending months trying to optimize some of our Flex apps, using all
th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-16964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648972#comment-13648972
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-16964:
--
Still an "issue" in Apache Flex 4.9 - should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648967#comment-13648967
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-28861:
--
Fixed issue with unused splice same as other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-28861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648962#comment-13648962
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-28861:
--
Anyone know what revision 22797 and 22853 wer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-14317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean updated FLEX-14317:
-
Labels: easytest (was: )
> mx.core.UITextField.truncateToFit() removes all text formatting i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-18072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-18072.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
No longer an issue if issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-18072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648956#comment-13648956
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-18072:
--
Both truncateToFit="false" and truncateToFit=
Alex,
Give me an opinion which of these you prefer. I have a few sets of
changes I could use. I will apply the same logic for the array based ones
too.
1. Keep the existing named methods (disableButton/enabledButton) and move
70% of code to a button index lookup method which they both call.
Hi Om,
I started with Alex's overlay approach and it goes well to start seeing a
concrete snapshot in time, but as I tried to develop with that setup I find
it was very difficult, so I end creating projects for FlexJSUI
(at flex-asjs/frameworks/as level and creating a launch configuration for
buil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-14316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Justin Mclean resolved FLEX-14316.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Apache Flex 4.10.0
Checked into develop branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-14316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648916#comment-13648916
]
Justin Mclean commented on FLEX-14316:
--
was fixed in UITextField but not in UIFTEText
I'll fiddle around with it and remove some of the redundancy.
Methods, like I use more centrally and have been working well.
findRowIndex(labelField, labelValue);
findRowIndices(fieldName, labelValues);
-Mark
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> Do you think it
Hi Alex,
fixed in my latest commit, not JS and SWF works ok. Things look better at
daylight ;).
Only JS side need to improve applicationModel to be getter/setter.
I change SimpleBinding fix to try catch as you suggested.
Best,
Carlos
2013/5/3 Alex Harui
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I don't think the ch
Yeah, I just pushed a fix for that.
The closure compiler now returns two warnings. Were you seeing that in your
branch? Otherwise, there must be something else I'm still not copying based
on chasing the requires list.
On 5/3/13 12:59 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I have the require
OK, I pushed a change to GoogDepsWriter that will handle goog.events.
Hopefully you'll be able to see that file.
On 5/3/13 12:00 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> BTW, I just found out that the closure library isn't consistent in its use
> of goog.provide/goog.require package names.
>
> For example: /
Alex,
I have the requires where they are supposed to be (only 3 places now,
1 for EventTarget - EventDispatcher - and 2 for Event - Event and
CustomEvent) and I'm getting errors from the Publisher:
1:
Finding file for class: goog.events.EventTarget
Could not find file for class: goog.events.Event
Interesting. Eclipse didn't auto-refresh after the pull. All's well
now, sorry about the confusion.
EdB
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> BTW, I just found out that the closure library isn't consistent in its use
> of goog.provide/goog.require package names.
>
> For example:
BTW, I just found out that the closure library isn't consistent in its use
of goog.provide/goog.require package names.
For example: /closure/goog/events/EventTarget.js is set up as expected:
goog.provide("goog.events.EventTarget");
But /closre/goog/events/Events.js just has
Goog.provide('goog.eve
Ok, hold on a bit, dinner is calling. Back in 60.
EdB
On Friday, May 3, 2013, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote:
> It does seem to be there in the develop branch.
>
>
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/~br=develop/flex-falcon/compiler.jx/src/org/apache/flex/compiler/internal/graph/GoogDepsWriter.
It does seem to be there in the develop branch.
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/~br=develop/flex-falcon/compiler.jx/src/org/apache/flex/compiler/internal/graph/GoogDepsWriter.java
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> SmartGit shows that file is in Git. Do you not see it?
SmartGit shows that file is in Git. Do you not see it? It is in
Compiler.jx/src/org/apache/flex/compiler/internal/graph
On 5/3/13 11:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> Wow. My git status is clean, but you're right, the log doesn't show that
> file in in.
>
> I'll try to figure out why it isn't sh
Wow. My git status is clean, but you're right, the log doesn't show that
file in in.
I'll try to figure out why it isn't showing up.
On 5/3/13 11:11 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> The thing is: FalconJX is not compiling 'out of the box'. I pulled the
> latest stuff for flex-falcon, rebuild the
The thing is: FalconJX is not compiling 'out of the box'. I pulled the
latest stuff for flex-falcon, rebuild the compiler (Falcon) with the ant
file in the root dir and then tried to compile FalconJX and it complained
it couldn't find GoogDepsWriter...
EdB
On Friday, May 3, 2013, Alex Harui wro
It is that damn circular dependency stuff again. This is easily the most
"broken" thing about the Closure compiler. Once we had to support
libraries, we couldn't filter out the circularities as we cross compile. We
have to filter out circularities at publish time.
In theory, if you have goog.re
Alex,
on April 29th you changed the GoogDepsWriter stuff in
MXMLFlexJSPublisher. Why? This has now broken the build of
'goog.events', as the goog library is no longer copied to the correct
location and the dependencies for 'goog.events.Event' and
'goog.events.EventTarget' are no longer correctly r
> stuff onto multiple lines just because it came out to 82 chars. BTW, have
> you considered trying to hack the python files in the closure linter?
Nope, but interesting suggestion...
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
OK. 4 is fine.
I'm ok with a line-length goal, but IMO, sometimes it isn't worth breaking
stuff onto multiple lines just because it came out to 82 chars. BTW, have
you considered trying to hack the python files in the closure linter?
On 5/3/13 9:38 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> It's the inter
It's the internal standard at Google, but almost everywhere else (I
know of) uses 4 spaces. JSLint doesn't care. I "grew up" on the Adobe
Flex coding conventions and I like 4 spaces from a readability point
of view. I also like an 80-ish character line length, for the same
reason. I like JSLint as
Is it a "standard" to use 2? If you want to use 2 I'll learn to live with
it. I can probably set up one editor for js editing.
On 5/3/13 8:37 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Ok, how about this: I'll replace all tabs and '4 spaces' with 2 spaces
> to satisfy the Closure Linter, run JSLint and jus
Ok, how about this: I'll replace all tabs and '4 spaces' with 2 spaces
to satisfy the Closure Linter, run JSLint and just before comitting,
I'll replace all '2 spaces' with 4 spaces (my favourite also) and not
fix the 80 char limit after that change. That way we have a consistent
base we all can wo
On 5/2/13 11:30 PM, "Tigran Najaryan" wrote:
>>
>> Hopefully, many of these people are going to be legitimate RIATest
>> customers. Do they get to use the free license to test their
> applications?
>> If not, how does the license checker determine whether that person is
>> testing the Flex S
Ok, I'm all checked in.
On 5/3/13 7:50 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will merge the 'goog.events' branch with 'develop' my tonight, so if
> everyone can check in their last minute commits to the JS part of
> FlexJS before 7 PM CEST (GMT +1; that's 10 AM for the lucky "few" who
> live
Hi,
I will merge the 'goog.events' branch with 'develop' my tonight, so if
everyone can check in their last minute commits to the JS part of
FlexJS before 7 PM CEST (GMT +1; that's 10 AM for the lucky "few" who
live on the US east coast) that would make your lives much easier.
Any changes not che
Oh ... ok so that's a feature that seems to have been added ... that's cool :-)
Von: João Fernandes [joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2013 13:06
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [FalconJX] Using RIATest
Chris, RiaTest does
Chris, RiaTest does support JUnit output to integrate in a CI server
On 3 May 2013 11:48, christofer.d...@c-ware.de wrote:
> As I mentioned, I am just adding my 50ct to the discussion.
>
> RIATest did leave a very good impression with me when evaluating it and I
> think I did give the tool a goo
As I mentioned, I am just adding my 50ct to the discussion.
RIATest did leave a very good impression with me when evaluating it and I think
I did give the tool a good overall result. However I really liked the tools for
which I was able to write my testcases in Junit or TestNG just because this
> From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de [mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de]
>
> Just to add my 50ct.
>
> Wouldn't it be good to use a tool for writing test that you can write
tests in
> Java? As far as I remember there was only a hand-full of tools supporting
> this when I evaluated a lot of these tools
Just to add my 50ct.
Wouldn't it be good to use a tool for writing test that you can write tests in
Java? As far as I remember there was only a hand-full of tools supporting this
when I evaluated a lot of these tools:
https://dev.c-ware.de/confluence/display/PUBLIC/Functional+Testing+Tools
Chri
58 matches
Mail list logo
