[dpdk-dev] open data plane based on dpdk and netdp

path of software router. and so on... Code link: https://github.com/opendp/dpdk-odp/tree/master/opendp -- Best Regards, zimeiw

[dpdk-dev] rte_memzone: memzone_reserve_aligned_thread_unsafe failed when running two process at the same time.

hi, Running primary process, it is successful. $ sudo ./simple_mp -c 1 -n 1 --socket-mem=64 --proc-type=primary EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0 EAL: Detected lcore 1 as core 0 on socket 0 EAL: Support maximum 64 logical core(s) by configuration. EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s) EAL: Setti

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK

hi, I have porting major FreeBSD tcp/ip stack to dpdk. new tcp/ip stack is based on dpdk rte_mbuf, rte_ring, rte_memory and rte_table. it is faster to forwarding packets. Below feature are ready: Netdp initialize Ether layer ARP IP layer Routing ICMP Commands for adding, deleting, showing IP

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK

hi, netdp stack use rte_mbuf directly, so no packet copied from DPDK port queue to netdp stack. netdp forwarding performance is same as FreeBSD. At 2014-09-09 02:20:16, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:49:44AM +0800, zimeiw wrote: >> I have porting m

[dpdk-dev] TCP/IP stack for DPDK

u can find the code from the link: https://github.com/dpdk-net/netdp >> >> Hi zimeiw, when will you be posting the source code to github? >> I can only find a static lib and some header files. > >It's BSD licensed, getting only the binary should be good enough >for you. :-) > >A.

[dpdk-dev] There are a lot of error log when run l3fwd of dpdk-1.7.1

Hi, When run l3fwd sample of dpdk-1.7.1 version, there are a lot of error log. But for dpdk-1.7.0 version, so such issue. My compile option: $ make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc $ make install T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc /examples/l3fwd$ sudo ./build/l3fwd -c 0x1 -n 1 -- -p 0x1 --con

[dpdk-dev] There are a lot of error log when run l3fwd of dpdk-1.7.1

At 2014-09-11 09:20:21, "zimeiw" wrote: >Hi, >When run l3fwd sample of dpdk-1.7.1 version, there are a lot of error log. > >But for dpdk-1.7.0 version, so such issue. > >My compile option: > >$ make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc >$ make install T=x8

[dpdk-dev] Intel 82599ES send packets failed on dpdk-17.05.1 after traffic testing

need some additional configuration for the NIC? Thanks. -- Best Regards, zimeiw

Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel 82599ES send packets failed on dpdk-17.05.1 after traffic testing

hi, no use rte_eth_tx_prepare()? I set txq_flags value as below, may it cause this issue? .txq_flags = ~ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMS -- Best Regards, zimeiw At 2017-08-22 15:49:56, "Ferruh Yigit" wrote: >On 8/22/2017 5:45 AM, zimeiw wrote: >> hi, >> My test env

Re: [dpdk-dev] Intel 82599ES send packets failed on dpdk-17.05.1 after traffic testing

Regards, zimeiw At 2017-08-23 17:04:44, "Ferruh Yigit" wrote: >On 8/23/2017 6:23 AM, zimeiw wrote: >> hi, >> >> Any comments? >> >> is it possible NIC haredware issue? or NIC firmware version isn't match >> dpdk driver? > >AFAIK for

[dpdk-dev] dpdk native tcp/ip stack (ans) performance

hi, Share dpdk tcp/ip stack performance here:  CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz  NIC 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connect

[dpdk-dev] dpdk native tcp/ip stack (ans) performance reach 11.78Mpps

hi, Share dpdk tcp/ip stack performance here: CPU Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz NIC 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (r

[dpdk-dev] tcp/ip stack based on dpdk is ready

s per second Still didn't test multicore tcp performance because lack test tools and env. For detail test result, please refer to https://github.com/opendp/dpdk-odp -- Best Regards, zimeiw

[dpdk-dev] why no API to free a ring?

hi, Could use rte_ring_create() API to create a ring, why no API to free it? -- Best Regards, zimeiw