[dpdk-dev] [RFC] l2fwd: trying to expose eth_igb_xmit_pkts unusual behavior

ping On 24.07.2015 15:59, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/07/15 11:13, Ciprian Barbu wrote: >> From: Ciprian Barbu >> >> This tries to show an approximate behavior described in an earlier >> discussion >> called "can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?" >> >> I'm using Int

[dpdk-dev] can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?

Hi, I'm seeing a strange behavior when calling rte_eth_tx_burst with len == 0. I'll explain the reason for this situation further bellow. But what I'm seeing is that after doing this call my application keeps returning from eth_igb_xmit_pkts here, even when len > 0: http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk

[dpdk-dev] can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?

Anyone? On 17.07.2015 16:48, ciprian.barbu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing a strange behavior when calling rte_eth_tx_burst with len == > 0. I'll explain the reason for this situation further bellow. But what > I'm seeing is that after doing this call my appl

[dpdk-dev] can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?

Hi Lu, Thank you for getting back to me. On 24.07.2015 05:49, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi Ciprian, > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ciprian.barbu >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 11:20 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org

[dpdk-dev] lost when learning how to test dpdk

On 28.07.2015 21:13, Jan Viktorin wrote: > Hello all, > > I am learning how to measure throughput with dpdk. I have 4 cores > Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4360 CPU @ 3.70GHz and two 82545GM NICs connected > together. I do not understand very well, how to setup testpmd. http://dpdk.org/doc http://dpdk.or