[PATCH] log: allow log register API to update log level

2024-08-09 Thread Bharath Paulraj
This commit fixes the bug in the registration API where it fails to set the log level if 'id' already exists. Signed-off-by: Bharath Paulraj --- .mailmap | 1 + lib/log/log.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap index

Reg: Link Bonding of VFs and PF admin down

2023-03-28 Thread bharath paulraj
Hello Team, I have two X710 NICs in the hypervisor and created the VFs on those NICs. PF is managed by the Linux kernel, while the VF is managed by DPDK. I am using the "test-pmd" application to test the bonding functionality, especially ACTIVE-BACKUP mode. I have created the bond interface and ad

[dpdk-dev] Reg: NIC82599 is not recovering once it stalls.

2015-09-18 Thread bharath paulraj
Hi Folks, While doing some implementation with dpdk-1.7.0 on NIC 82599, I am facing an issue. If i am sending the packets to the NIC at the line rate and the application which i developed using DPDK is not processing the packets that much faster, then the NIC starts to drop packets (of course, thi

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-03-15 Thread bharath paulraj
it is enabled, then VLAN should be the only classifier to determine the packets fate to reach the VM. Is it possible to do the classification based on the VLAN alone? Thanks, Bharath Paulraj

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-03-16 Thread bharath paulraj
does not support this? Thanks, Bharath Paulraj On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi Bharath, > > > 2) Is the above supported for 82599 controller? If it is supported > in the NIC, > > please provide the steps to enable. > Talking about 82599, V

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-03-17 Thread bharath paulraj
de for X710/XL710 virtual > functions requires Linux kernel support, iproute2 package support and > driver support. Only when all three of these are in place will the feature > work. > > Thanks, > > - Greg > > -Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Helin &

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-03-22 Thread bharath paulraj
t; ethtool -N $(PF_INTF) flow-type udp4 dst-port 4789 action 0x1 > (VF0 queue 0) > > Here we using flow director to all let packets according to the rules to > the VF, But I don't know if it could let the packets to other VFs at the > same time. > > Thanks, > M

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-03-31 Thread bharath paulraj
e some help on it. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:03 PM, bharath paulraj wrote: > Thanks a lot Michael. Finally i am able to see some light. I will try the > same in our setup and will post you the results. > > Thanks, > Bharath > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Qiu, Michael

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-04-07 Thread bharath paulraj
Hi Team, May I have some update on my previous mail? I am here stuck in flow creation. Thanks, Bharath On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:13 PM, bharath paulraj wrote: > Hi Michael and All, > > I am unable to set the rule to receive the packet on the VF. > Below is my setup. >

[dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF

2016-04-12 Thread bharath paulraj
ask: 0xff00 > > Action: Direct to queue 1 > > > > Be sure to use a version of ethtool 3.0 or greater and a recent kernel ? I > tested on ethtool version 3.15 with a 3.18.4 Linux kernel from kernel.org > and using the most recent ixgbe driver release. > >