[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-10-27 Thread Vimal Chungath
more information about Graviton2 platform, refer to: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ Signed-off-by: Vimal Chungath --- config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17 + config/arm/meson.build | 12 +++- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-10-27 Thread Vimal Chungath
V2 changes: - drop make patch Vimal Chungath (1): build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17 + config/arm/meson.build | 12 +++- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 config

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-11-03 Thread Vimal Chungath
On 11/3/20 10:38 AM, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Thomas Monjalon >> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 12:02 AM >> To: Vimal Chungath ; >> honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; dharmik.thak...@arm.com; Jeri

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/1] build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-11-03 Thread Vimal Chungath
Hi All, I see that meson rework patches are still pending. Can this patch be accepted for 20.11 to enable Graviton2 support? v3 changes: - remove flags_n1sdp_extra as it is unused. Vimal Chungath (1): build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] build: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-11-03 Thread Vimal Chungath
more information about Graviton2 platform, refer to: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ Signed-off-by: Vimal Chungath --- config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17 + config/arm/meson.build | 18 +++--- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v13 00/12] Arm build options rework

2020-12-16 Thread Vimal Chungath
ny (native, SoC or cross) build > I tested on Graviton2 and it looks good to me. I tested native, cross and the arm_soc builds and verified the config options for Graviton2. Series Tested-by: Vimal Chungath

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] build: add Graviton2(arm64) config

2020-09-08 Thread Vimal Chungath
These two patches add meson and make build configuration for AWS Graviton2 platform. I plan to send platform guide patch separately. Vimal Chungath (2): config: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration config: add Graviton2(arm64) defconfig config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-09-08 Thread Vimal Chungath
more information about Graviton2 platform, refer to: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ Signed-off-by: Vimal Chungath --- config/arm/arm64_graviton2_linux_gcc | 17 + config/arm/meson.build | 12 +++- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] config: add Graviton2(arm64) defconfig

2020-09-08 Thread Vimal Chungath
: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ Signed-off-by: Vimal Chungath --- config/defconfig_arm64-graviton2-linux-gcc| 1 + config/defconfig_arm64-graviton2-linuxapp-gcc | 13 +++ config/defconfig_graviton2| 1 + mk/machine/graviton2/rte.vars.mk | 33

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-09-12 Thread Vimal Chungath
part number? > >> 3. remove +crc from -march as that is default when setting armv8.2 >> >> For more information about Graviton2 platform, refer to: >> https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Vimal Chungath >> --- >> config/ar

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] build: add Graviton2(arm64) config

2020-09-12 Thread Vimal Chungath
On 9/9/20 1:03 AM, David Marchand wrote: > > Hello Vimal, > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:11 AM Vimal Chungath wrote: >> >> These two patches add meson and make build configuration >> for AWS Graviton2 platform. I plan to send platform guide >> patch separately. &

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config: add Graviton2(arm64) meson configuration

2020-09-18 Thread Vimal Chungath
think we do not need the native build. With the native build, it is not >> possible to identify the SoC and use the correct configuration parameters. > > Ack. Both native and cross can use same config. > >> >>> 2) For cross-build, explicitly, mention the target t