[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-13 Thread Take Ceara
Hi, I'm reposting here as I didn't get any answers on the dpdk-users mailing list. We're working on a stateful traffic generator (www.warp17.net) using DPDK and we would like to control two XL710 NICs (one on each socket) to maximize CPU usage. It looks that we run into the following limitation:

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-14 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Keith, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > On 6/13/16, 9:07 AM, "dev on behalf of Take Ceara" on behalf of dumitru.ceara at gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I'm reposting here as I didn't get any answers on the dpdk-us

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-14 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Bruce, On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:07:37PM +0200, Take Ceara wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm reposting here as I didn't get any answers on the dpdk-users mailing >> list. >> >> We're w

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Keith, On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>> Normally the limitation is in the hardware, basically how the PCI bus is >>> connected to the CPUs (or sockets). How the PCI buses are connected to the >>> system depends on the Mother board design. I normally see the buses >>>

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > From the output below it appears the x710 devices 01:00.[0-3] are on socket 0 > And the x710 devices 02:00.[0-3] sit on socket 1. > I assume there's a mistake here. The x710 devices on socket 0 are: $ lspci | grep -ie "01:.*x710" 01:00.0 Et

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > Right now I do not know what the issue is with the system. Could be too many > Rx/Tx ring pairs per port and limiting the memory in the NICs, which is why > you get better performance when you have 8 core per port. I am not really > seei

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > On 6/16/16, 11:56 AM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" dpdk.org on behalf of keith.wiles at intel.com> wrote: > >> >>On 6/16/16, 11:20 AM, "Take Ceara" wrote: >> >>&

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > On 6/16/16, 1:20 PM, "Take Ceara" wrote: > >>On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Wiles, Keith >>wrote: >>> >>> On 6/16/16, 11:56 AM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" >> dpdk.org o

[dpdk-dev] Performance hit - NICs on different CPU sockets

2016-06-16 Thread Take Ceara
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > On 6/16/16, 3:16 PM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" on behalf of keith.wiles at intel.com> wrote: > >> >>On 6/16/16, 3:00 PM, "Take Ceara" wrote: >> >>>On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-18 Thread Take Ceara
RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM. > Thank you very much for your reporting! > > BTW, dev at dpdk.org should be the right one to replace users at dpdk.org, > for sending questions/issues like this. Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. > > Regards, > Helin Regards, Dumitru > >

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-19 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Beilei, On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Xing, Beilei wrote: > Hi Ceara, > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Take Ceara >> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:14 AM >> To: Zhang, Helin >> Cc: Wu, Jingj

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-21 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Beilei, On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Xing, Beilei wrote: > Hi Ceara, > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:59 PM >> To: Xing, Beilei >> Cc: Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-22 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Beilei, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Xing, Beilei wrote: > Hi Ceara, > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 6:58 PM >> To: Xing, Beilei >> Cc: Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jing

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-22 Thread Take Ceara
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Take Ceara wrote: > Hi Beilei, > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Xing, Beilei > wrote: >> Hi Ceara, >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >>> Sent: T

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-25 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Beilei, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Xing, Beilei wrote: > Hi, > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 8:32 PM >> To: Xing, Beilei >> Cc: Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing > in

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-26 Thread Take Ceara
Hi Beilei, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Take Ceara wrote: > Hi Beilei, > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Xing, Beilei > wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >>> Sent:

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] RSS Hash not working for XL710/X710 NICs for some RX mbuf sizes

2016-07-26 Thread Take Ceara
/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c#n1419 Regards, Dumitru > Regards, > Helin > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Take Ceara [mailto:dumitru.ceara at gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 4:38 PM >> To: Xing, Beilei >> Cc: Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing > intel.com