[dpdk-dev] Recent change to make rte_cryptodev_pmd.h internal prevents some important functionality

Hi Everyone, We use cryptodev in SPDK and included rte_cryptodev_pmd.h so that we may release qpair memory that was allocated when we called rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup(). We’d do so by calling the function pointer queue_pair_release() which I believe is the prescribed way to do this. The

[dpdk-dev] Recent change to make rte_cryptodev_pmd.h internal prevents some important functionality

Hi Everyone, I sent this last week and haven’t heard back – apologize if I missed the response but if not here it is again… We use cryptodev in SPDK and included rte_cryptodev_pmd.h so that we may release qpair memory that was allocated when we called rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup(). We’d do

[dpdk-dev] Issue/Question with multi-process and CryptoDev using AESNI_MB

Hi All, I'm having an issue with the following scenario with SPDK-based applications built w/DPDK using CryptoDev in a primary/secondary process setup. Primary Process: An application that does crypto and properly initializes aesni_mb Secondary Process: An application that does not use crypto s

[dpdk-dev] Issue/Question with multi-process and CryptoDev using AESNI_MB

Hi All, I'm having an issue with the following scenario with SPDK-based applications built w/DPDK using CryptoDev in a primary/secondary process setup. Primary Process: An application that does crypto and properly initializes aesni_mb Secondary Process: An application that does not use crypto s

Re: [dpdk-dev] mail to ack

-Original Message- From: Trahe, Fiona Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:43 AM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Jozwiak, TomaszX ; shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com; ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com; Daly, Lee ; Luse, Paul E ; Trahe, Fiona Subject: RE

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] compressdev: add feature flag to specify where processing is done

Resend wrong subject -Original Message- From: Trahe, Fiona Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 7:43 AM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev@dpdk.org; akhil.go...@nxp.com; Jozwiak, TomaszX ; shally.ve...@caviumnetworks.com; ashish.gu...@caviumnetworks.com; Daly, Lee ; Luse, Paul E ; Trahe, Fiona

[dpdk-dev] Question / possible issue with vdev_scan() in secondary process

Hi, I have a test case where vdev_scan() is being called in a secondary process as shown below in a snippet from the function. My test application is compiled with AddressSanitizer which was complaining about a memory leak of memory allocated in rte_mp_request_sync(). I added the free() call

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] net/tap: check interface name in kvargs

Thanks Jim!! -from my iPhone > On Jan 11, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > >> On Jan 11, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >> >> If interface name is passed to remote or iface then check >> the length and for invalid characters. This avoids problems where >> name

[dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

Hi, I'm working on an SPDK module that uses the DPDK cryptodev framework, initially I'm using the AESNI PMD and have a few questions. in the doc it says that only in-place is supported however I see code in set_mb_job_params() just after the comment "Mutable crypto operation parameters" it appe

[dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

Hi, I'm working on an SPDK module that uses the DPDK cryptodev framework, initially I'm using the AESNI PMD and have a few questions. in the doc it says that only in-place is supported however I see code in set_mb_job_params() just after the comment "Mutable crypto operation parameters" it appe

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 3:36 PM To: Luse, Paul E Cc: dev@dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; Doherty, Declan Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD Cc Declan and Pablo

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

That's what I'm doing now, with a small hack to the function I mention below, and it seems to be working good. Thanks! Pau -Original Message- From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:19 PM To: Luse, Paul E ; Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Decla

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

64K) seems to not generate an error but also not encrypt the data. Would be good to know if that's a real limitation or not, for not I've worked around it in the calling code by breaking things up so that any single crypto op is 32K or less. Thanks Paul -Original Message----- From:

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI PMD

Any thoughts on this? -Original Message- From: Luse, Paul E Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 5:43 PM To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; 'Thomas Monjalon' Cc: 'dev@dpdk.org' ; Doherty, Declan ; Harris, James R ; Verkamp, Daniel Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Question on AESNI

[dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK)

Hi, Recently this patch https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/5284adad3e95025f9901869f581c8c04ea642d32 made the following change: * mbuf: Removed the unioned fields ``userdata`` and ``udata64`` from the structure ``rte_mbuf``. It is replaced with dynamic fields. Which breaks the SPDK project’

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK)

Great, thanks for the quick response!! -Paul From: Thomas Monjalon Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 2:30 AM To: Luse, Paul E Cc: dev@dpdk.org , olivier.m...@6wind.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK) Hi