Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] Wind River Systems AVP PMD vs virtio?

Hi, Virtio is special in many ways: - it is a multi-vendor supported specification - it is a multi-vendor opensource implementation in guest OSes (Windows, Linux, FreeBSD...) - it is a multi-vendor, opensource implementation in hypervisors So, the great benefit of virtio is that with a SINGLE d

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/17] Wind River Systems AVP PMD vs virtio?

On 16 March 2017 at 11:32, Chas Williams <3ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 03:18 +, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > > > From: Vincent JARDIN [mailto:vincent.jar...@6wind.com] > > > > > > Le 15/03/2017 à 11:55, Thomas Monjalon a écrit : > > > >> I'd suggest that this is a good topic f

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] Add mdev (Mediated device) support in DPDK

Hi all, I presented an approach in Fosdem (https://archive.fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/netmdev/) and feel happy someone is picking up. If we step back a little, the mdev concept is to allow userland to be given a direct control over the hardware data path on a device still controlled by the ke

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] [PATCH v2] libeventdev: event driven programming model framework for DPDK

Dear Jerin, Very nice work! This new RFC version opens the way to a unified conceptual model of Software Defined Data Planes supported by diverse implementations such as OpenDataPlane and DPDK. I think this is an important signal to the industry. Fran?ois-Fr?d?ric _