s) we
recommend using DPDK20.11 and OFED5.2, and not the combo you are referring to.
Second, we can always improve our documentation and I appreciate your queries.
Please see my comments inline.
Regards,
Asaf Penso
-Original Message-
From: dev On Behalf Of David Bouyeure
Sent: Monday,
far.
Thanks again.
Regards.
On 4/5/21 12:23 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
Hi
I will try to answer inline with prefix [MA].
*From:* David Bouyeure
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 30, 2021 6:46 PM
*To:* Asaf Penso ; dev@dpdk.org
*Cc:* Matan Azrad ; Jack Min
*Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] rte_flow ageing
*Exter
don't understand what is the issue for you in option 1...
השג את Outlook עבור Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
----
*From:* David Bouyeure
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 7, 2021 7:19:34 PM
*To:* Matan Azrad ; Asaf Pe
&= ~MLX5_AGE_EVENT_NEW;
}
}
Thanks.
On 4/8/21 11:52 AM, Matan Azrad wrote:
Yes, you right for the meaning of MLX5_AGE_TRIGGER.
But why you said it is erased when the callback return?
It is erased when a new aged-out flow is detected by the driver….
Do you have an issue with option 1?
M
Hi,
I've found out the pretty useful experimental brand new flow ageing API
implemented in the mlx5 PMD.
I'm trying it (rte_eth_dev_callback_register(RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED),
RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_AGE) to recover any flow that I previously offloaded.
The DPDK version is 20.08 and Mellanox(
Sorry for the below topic confusion(in-reply-to).
On 3/29/21 9:50 AM, David Bouyeure wrote:
Hi,
I've found out the pretty useful experimental brand new flow ageing
API implemented in the mlx5 PMD.
I'm trying it (rte_eth_dev_callback_register(RTE_ETH_EVENT
Hi,
I've found out the pretty useful experimental brand new flow ageing API
implemented in the mlx5 PMD.
I'm trying it (rte_eth_dev_callback_register(RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED),
RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_AGE) to recover any flow that I previously offloaded.
The DPDK version is 20.08 and Mellanox(
7 matches
Mail list logo
