[dpdk-dev] Unable to compile DPDK 1.5 on Debian GNU/Linux: lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio

2013-11-04 Thread Cyril Cressent
Hi Marc, On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:58:56PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > > I am unable to compile DPDK 1.5 (and previous versions) on Debian > GNU/Linux Wheezy (7) and Squeeze (6). I mainly work with a machine running Debian Testing. I'm assuming that by DPDK 1.5 you mean the latest version as of t

[dpdk-dev] Unable to compile DPDK 1.5 on Debian GNU/Linux: lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio

2013-11-04 Thread Cyril Cressent
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:58:56PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > Dear all, > > I am unable to compile DPDK 1.5 (and previous versions) on Debian > GNU/Linux Wheezy (7) and Squeeze (6). > > It seems to me an issue with Make, probably different default flags > on this distribution, since the problemati

[dpdk-dev] preallocation of void ** obj_p of rte_ring_dequeue

2013-11-05 Thread Cyril Cressent
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 06:15:01PM +0800, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote: > > When using *static int rte_ring_dequeue( structe rte_ring * r, void ** > obj_p )*, is the user presumed to allocate obj_p , or does this method > allocates this obj_p ? This method doesn't allocate anything ; you have to alloc

[dpdk-dev] pci_unbind.py failure

2013-11-05 Thread Cyril Cressent
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:41:17PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar wrote: > > I have 82579LM NIC which i'm trying to bind to the igb_uio driver. I get > the following error I can't find the 82579LM listed on http://dpdk.org/doc/nics or in lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h My guess is

[dpdk-dev] Unable to compile DPDK 1.5 on Debian GNU/Linux: lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio

2013-11-05 Thread Cyril Cressent
Hi Marc, On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:53:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > > I think it is not this variable. When the folder > /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build does not exist, the Makefile > properly warns you (I manually created it, since it was not existing > during the first compilation attemp

[dpdk-dev] pci_unbind.py failure

2013-11-05 Thread Cyril Cressent
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:01:06PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. I saw some definitions of e1000_phy_82579 hence > I thought (hoped) the NIC would be supported. I will try to run my dpdk app > inside a VM with an emulated e1000 NIC (just to test the code ..). A

[dpdk-dev] preallocation of void ** obj_p of rte_ring_dequeue

2013-11-05 Thread Cyril Cressent
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:47:13AM +0800, Jose Gavine Cueto wrote: > Your'e welcome, and by the way the multiprocess example of simple_mp seems > confusing here: > > static int > lcore_recv(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) > { > unsigned lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); > > printf("Starting core %u\

[dpdk-dev] Problem in DPDK1.4 controlling 82599 ixgbe NICS with Fedora 19

2013-10-10 Thread Cyril Cressent
Hi Prashant, On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:53:56AM +0530, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote: > I am using DPDK1.4 with Fedora 19 [I am aware that DPDK1.4 release notes do > not claim Fedora 19 as supported, but I tried nevertheless and reporting this > issue] Which kernel version are you running? > Now