On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Mauricio V?squez
wrote:
> Hello Alexander,
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Alexander Duyck gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Mauricio V?squez
>> wrote:
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>
On 10/02/2015 07:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> validation and translation would add 10s if not 100s of nanoseconds to the
>> time needed to process each packet. In addition we are talking about doing
>>
On 10/12/2015 06:33 AM, Harry van Haaren wrote:
> Fix a misinterpretation of VF stats in ixgbe
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 8 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> b/driv
On 10/13/2015 07:47 AM, Sanford, Robert wrote:
[Robert:]
1. The 82599 device supports up to 128 queues. Why do we see trouble
with as few as 5 queues? What could limit the system (and one port
controlled by 5+ cores) from receiving at line-rate without loss?
2. As far
On 10/13/2015 11:57 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
> I believe I've discovered my problem:
> https://gist.github.com/AlexForster/0fb4699bcdf196cf5462
>
> As mentioned previously, I have two X520-Q1 cards installed. It appears that
> initialization of the first card obeys allow_unsupported_sfp=1, but
>
On 10/15/2015 07:46 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
> On 10/13/15, 4:34 PM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote:
>
>> If you are using Intel's out-of-tree ixgbe driver I believe the module
>> parameters are comma separated with one index per port. So if you have
&
On 10/15/2015 08:43 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
> On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote:
>
>> On 10/15/2015 07:46 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
>>> On 10/13/15, 4:34 PM, "Alexander Duyck"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you are usin
On 10/15/2015 10:13 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
> On 10/15/15, 12:17 PM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote:
>
>
>> On 10/15/2015 08:43 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
>>> On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/15
On 10/15/2015 10:13 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
> On 10/15/15, 12:17 PM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote:
>
>
>> On 10/15/2015 08:43 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
>>> On 10/15/15, 11:30 AM, "Alexander Duyck"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/15
On 10/18/2015 06:06 PM, Alex Forster wrote:
> On 10/15/15, 3:53 PM, "Alexander Duyck" wrote:
>
>
>>>> It looks like you are probably seeing interfaces be unbound and then
>>>> rebound. As such you are likely pushing things outside of the array
>&
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Mauricio V?squez
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I implemented a program that uses flow director to forward packets to a
> specific virtual function, however I faced the problem that I did not know
> which queue belongs to a VF. I found in [1] that in the case of Intel
> 825
On 10/01/2015 07:57 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:59:02 +0300
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2015 01:28 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> This is a new UIO device driver to allow supporting MSI-X and MSI devices
>>> in userspace. It has been used in environments like VMwa
On 10/01/2015 06:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:07:13PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
This in itself is going to use up
a good proportion of the processing time, as well as that we have to spend
cycles
copying the descriptors from one ring in mem
On 10/01/2015 02:42 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 12:22:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> even when they are some users
>> prefer to avoid the performance penalty.
> I don't think there's a measureable penalty from passing through the
> IOMMU, as long as mappings are mostly
On 10/01/2015 03:00 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:48:36 -0700
> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2015 07:57 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:59:02 +0300
>>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/01
On 09/30/2015 03:28 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This driver allows using PCI device with Message Signalled Interrupt
> from userspace. The API is similar to the igb_uio driver used by the DPDK.
> Via ioctl it provides a mechanism to map MSI-X interrupts into event
> file descriptors similar to V
On 10/01/2015 04:39 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:03:06 -0700
> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2015 03:00 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 12:48:36 -0700
>>> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>
>>>> On
On 10/01/2015 05:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:40:10 -0700
> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> I agree with some other reviewers. Why call pci_enable_msix in open?
>> It seems like it would make much more sense to do this on probe, and
>> then di
On 10/01/2015 05:04 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:43:23 -0700
> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> Yes, but in the case of something like a VF it is going to just make a
>> bigger mess of things since INTx doesn't work. So what would you expect
>>
On 10/01/2015 05:04 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:40:10 -0700
> Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> Do you really need to map IORESOURCE bars? Most drivers I can think of
>> don't use IO BARs anymore. Maybe we could look at just dropping the
>> cod
On 07/16/2015 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> If FM10K_DEBUG_DRIVER is enabled, then the log messages about
> function entry are missing newline causing extremely long lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
> ---
> drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_osdep.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 inser
I have noticed a number of emails from this list are going to spam. It looks
like it might be gmail filtering based on the fact that most of the list has a
valid SPF based on an IPv4 address that reports out like below:
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org. [92.243.14.124])
by mx.google.co
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:09 AM, SwamZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> While doing performance testing with larger packet size (like 4000 bytes),
> we are seeing rx_missed_errors on the interface. This issue is not seen
> with packet size less than 2000. There were questions asked in this forum
> on rx_missed_
23 matches
Mail list logo
