Hi Team,
Currently we are exploring our DPDK application using af_xdp in a non-root
mode.
When the DPDK application invokes AF_XDP, it calls xsk_umem__create() and
thus requires CAP_IPC_LOCK capability to be enabled. if the application
does not provide CAP_IPC_LOCK capability, it fails in the buff
On 12/21/2022 2:52 AM, Jesna K E wrote:
> +/* Takes ethdev as parameter
> + * Used in dev_start by primary process and then
> + * in dev_init by secondary process when attaching to an existing ethdev.
> + */
> +void
> +axgbe_set_tx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct axgbe_port
On 12/23/2022 10:44 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/21/2022 2:52 AM, Jesna K E wrote:
>> +/* Takes ethdev as parameter
>> + * Used in dev_start by primary process and then
>> + * in dev_init by secondary process when attaching to an existing ethdev.
>> + */
>> +void
>> +axgbe_set_tx_function(stru
Packets are captured at each graph node with the node and mbuf metadata
as part of the pcap.
This is inspired from VPP.
Signed-off-by: Amit Prakash Shukla
---
doc/guides/sample_app_ug/l3_forward_graph.rst | 3 +
examples/l3fwd-graph/main.c | 12 +
lib/graph/graph_pcap_trace
That's expected behavior.
rte_mbuf_clone() doesn't duplicate your packet data - instead
new mbuf just attaches to existing data packet.
If you need to modify one (or both) packet data after cloning -
you can use rte_pktmbuf_copy() instead.
As another alternative - have a look at examples/ip_multica
> > Hi Morten,
> >
> > > PING mempool maintainers.
> > >
> > > If you don't provide ACK or Review to patches, how should Thomas know
> > that it is ready for merging?
> > >
> > > -Morten
> >
> > The code changes itself looks ok to me.
> > Though I don't think it would really bring any noticeable
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:24:29 +0100
Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/eal/version.map b/lib/eal/version.map
> index 7ad12a7dc9..2dbc10e6be 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/version.map
> +++ b/lib/eal/version.map
> @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> rte_thread_detach;
> rte_thread_equa
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 07:00:40 +
NAGENDRA BALAGANI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing strange behavior where rte_pktmbuf_clone is not giving desired
> result.
> Here is the detailed info, in my dpdk application , once I received the
> packet info in mbuf, I need to send the same packet to two des
> > From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.anan...@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2022 16.57
> >
> > > Zero-copy access to mempool caches is beneficial for PMD performance,
> > and
> > > must be provided by the mempool library to fix [Bug 1052] without a
> > > performance regress
9 matches
Mail list logo
