Under active traffic, qemu switch vq enable state, there will be segment
fault.
The reason is that timer polling thread or channel event thread still
referencing resources that being destroyed or partially initialized.
This patch add per device vq configuration lock and test device ready
flag in
The driver CQ event management is done by non vhost library thread,
either the dpdk host thread or the internal vDPA driver thread.
When a queue is updated the CQ may be destroyed and created by the vhost
library thread via the queue state operation.
When the queue update feature was added, it di
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the reply.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:37 AM Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
>
> rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new
> replacement for rte_sched if you want something else.
Yes, we did realize that rte_sched is not suitable for AQM algorithms.
W
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
Add 64 byte padding at the end of event device public structure to allow
future extensions.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
---
http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=10728&state=*
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertion
From: Zhiguang He <191390...@qq.com>
when parament reta_size < RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE,
reta_count will be 0. Then this function will
be deadloop
Fixes: 734ce47f71e0 ("bonding: support RSS dynamic configuration")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Zhiguang He <1913909...@qq.com>
---
drivers/net/bon
The compilation fault did not reproduce on my setup:
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.2 (Ootpa)
$ meson --version
0.49.2
$ ninja --version
1.8.2
ofed_info -s
MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.1-0.6.6.0
$ git show HEAD
commit 6636b04b82897816e0e05134f55a578cb7e124bc (tag: v20.08-rc3)
$ m
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 23:04:28 -0700
lon...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li
>
> The code should look into "slab" to figure out the index returned from
> rte_bitmap_scan().
>
> Fixes: cc02518132 ("net/netvsc: split send buffers from Tx descriptors")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by:
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
The l3fwd example should use the reserved IPv4/v6 reserved address
ranges defined in RFC5735 and RFC5180 and RFC863 discard protocol for
the port number in the exact match mode of L3 forwarding.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 87 +++
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
Since the number of Ethernet ports have gone up, print the pci bdf along
with the routes.
This is also helpful for cases where whitelisting order is honored.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16
1 file changed, 12 insertions
From: Pavan Nikhilesh
Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added for
lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8 interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
---
v2 Changes:
- Fixup for EM mode.
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16
1 file cha
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:03:49PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> In order to prepare for adding more features requiring more space in mbuf,
> some static fields must become dynamic.
> Some small layout changes may have performance benefits as well.
>
> The deprecation notice for atomic refcount
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:12:36AM +0800, yang_y_yi wrote:
>
>
> At 2020-07-31 23:15:43, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:08:59PM +0800, yang_y...@163.com wrote:
> >> From: Yi Yang
> >>
> >> In GSO case, segmented mbufs are attached to original
> >> mbuf whic
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:29:07PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:12:36AM +0800, yang_y_yi wrote:
> >
> >
> > At 2020-07-31 23:15:43, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:08:59PM +0800, yang_y...@163.com wrote:
> > >> From: Yi Yan
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:43 AM Archit Pandey
wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:37 AM Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
> >
> > rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new
> > replacement for rte_sched if you want something else.
>
>
At 2020-08-03 04:29:07, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:12:36AM +0800, yang_y_yi wrote:
>>
>>
>> At 2020-07-31 23:15:43, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:08:59PM +0800, yang_y...@163.com wrote:
>> >> From: Yi Yang
>> >>
>> >> In GSO ca
At 2020-08-03 04:45:12, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:29:07PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:12:36AM +0800, yang_y_yi wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > At 2020-07-31 23:15:43, "Olivier Matz" wrote:
>> > >Hi,
>> > >
>> > >On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 08:08
Hi, Zhiguang He
On 2020/8/2 20:27, 1913909...@qq.com wrote:
From: Zhiguang He <191390...@qq.com>
when parament reta_size < RTE_RETA_GROUP_SIZE,
reta_count will be 0. Then this function will
be deadloop
Fixes: 734ce47f71e0 ("bonding: support RSS dynamic configuration")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Si
RSS for IPv6 prefix fields are supported in this patchset, so that we
can use prefixes instead of full IPv6 address for AVF RSS. The prefix
here includes the first 64 bits of both SRC and DST IPv6 address.
[PATCH 1/2] common/iavf: support virtual channel for IPv6 prefix.
[PATCH 2/2] net/iavf: supp
Some IPv6 prefix related protocol header fields are defined in this
patch, so that we can use prefix instead of full IPv6 address for RSS.
Ref https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6052.
Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo
---
drivers/common/iavf/virtchnl.h | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
RSS for IPv6 prefix 64bit fields are supported in this patch, so that
we can use prefix instead of full IPv6 address for RSS. The prefix
here only includes the first 64 bits of both SRC and DST IPv6 address.
Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo
---
drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c | 232 ++
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 1:04 AM McDaniel, Timothy
wrote:
>
> From: "McDaniel, Timothy"
The patch should have some description and
Please change the subject to: "doc: eventdev ABI change to support DLB PMD"
>
> Signed-off-by: McDaniel, Timothy
We don't use "," in the Signed-off-by.
Please chang
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:21 PM wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh
I think, git subject can be changed to "doc: add reserve fields to
eventdev public structures"
>
> Add 64 byte padding at the end of event device public structure to allow
> future extensions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:02 AM
> To: Fady Bader
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon ; Tasnim Bashar
> ; Tal Shnaiderman ; Yohad Tor
> ; dmitry.kozl...@gmail.com;
> harini.ramakrish...@microsoft.com; ocard...@microsoft.com;
23 matches
Mail list logo
