Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_sched: correctly free allocated subport memory

On 27. 05. 2020. 13:48, Singh, Jasvinder wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev On Behalf Of Hrvoje Habjanic >> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 6:25 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_sched: correctly free allocated subport >> memory >> >> In function rte_sched_subp

[dpdk-dev] [DPDK API question]

ss Hi, Guys I am learning data structure defined by dpdk framework and I noticed a data structure definition below: enum rte_eth_hash_function { RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_DEFAULT = 0, RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_TOEPLITZ, /**< Toeplitz */ RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_SIMPLE_XOR, /**< Simple XOR

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 3/3] l3fwd-power: add interrupt-only mode

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote: > External Email > > -- > On 29-May-20 2:19 PM, Harman Kalra wrote: > > > > if (ret < 0) > > > rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid L3FWD pa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/3] mbuf: add Tx offloads for packet marking

> > > I also share Olivier's concern about consuming 3 bits in ol_flags for > > > that feature. > > > Can it probably be squeezed somehow? > > > Let say we reserve one flag that this information is present or not, and > > > re-use one of rx-only fields for store additional information > > > (pack