IBV_EVENT_DEVICE_FATAL event is generated by the driver once for
the entire multiport Infiniband device, not for each existing ports.
The port index is zero and it causes dropping the device removal
event. We should invoke the removal event processing routine
for each port we have installed handler
Sunday, May 12, 2019 11:32 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko:
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix device removal handler for
> multiport device
>
> IBV_EVENT_DEVICE_FATAL event is generated by the driver once for the
> entire multiport Infiniband device, not for each existing ports.
> The port i
Sunday, May 12, 2019 3:15 PM, Shahaf Shuler:
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix device removal handler for
> multiport device
>
> Sunday, May 12, 2019 11:32 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko:
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix device removal handler
> > for multiport device
>
This patch adds some missing features to Mellanox drivers release notes.
It also updates the mlx5/mlx4 documentations.
Fixes: d85b204b5dba ("doc: update release notes for Mellanox drivers")
Cc: ys...@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Ori Kam
---
doc/guides/nics/mlx4.rst | 2 +-
doc/gu
This patch adds some missing features to Mellanox drivers release notes.
It also updates the mlx5/mlx4 documentations.
Fixes: d85b204b5dba ("doc: update release notes for Mellanox drivers")
Cc: ys...@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Ori Kam
---
v2:
* fix checkpatch warning.
---
doc/guides/nics/m
Thank you for your more info!
Acked-by: Wei Zhao
> -Original Message-
> From: wangyunjian [mailto:wangyunj...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 7:38 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: i.maxim...@samsung.com; xudingke ;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ne
Tested-by: Peng Yuan
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 4:41 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Peng, Yuan ; Yigit, Ferruh
> ; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhao1, Wei
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: remove port stop check for macsec
>
> There is no nee
Tested-by: Peng Yuan
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhao1, Wei
> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 3:21 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Peng, Yuan ; Yigit, Ferruh
> ; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhao1, Wei
>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix offloads overwrite by default configuration
>
> The
> On 2019-05-10 15:30, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> Any review please?
>
> Reviewed-by: Mattias Rönnblom
>
> Mattias Elo reported "Thanks, I’ve tested this patch and can confirm that it
> fixes the problem." for the (nearly identical) v2 of this patch.
I’ve now tested also the v3:
Tested-by: M
Hi,
This is in regards with using Cryptographic libraries with DPDK crypto
PMDs. Intel has its own Cryptographic libraries for various algorithms
hosted in git and some restricted channels.
I would like to know if any other library can be attached to the Crypto Pmd.
For e.g. I would like to know i
Hi Ori,
See some comments below.
Sunday, May 12, 2019 11:33 PM, Ori Kam:
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: fix update release notes for Mellanox
> drivers
>
> This patch adds some missing features to Mellanox drivers release notes.
> It also updates the mlx5/mlx4 documentations.
>
> Fixes:
Hi,
PSB
> -Original Message-
> From: Shahaf Shuler
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 8:26 AM
> To: Ori Kam ; Yongseok Koh ;
> Matan Azrad ; Thomas Monjalon
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: fix update release notes for Mellanox
> drivers
>
> Hi Ori,
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
