Due to time risk and to enable more discussion over
the proposed generic tunnel encapsulation [1]
This RFC only adds encapsulation for MPLS tunnel type,
which is based on the current tunnel encapsulaiton actions.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-June/103485.html
Signed-off-by: Ori Kam
-
-Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 16:05:07 +0530
> From: Shally Verma
> To: pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com
> CC: fiona.tr...@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, pathr...@caviumnetworks.com,
> mcha...@caviumnetworks.com, Ashish Gupta
> , Sunila Sahu
>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/7]
Ack. Trivial issue related to other patch found , not sure whether it good to
fix it here.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:35 AM
> To: Shahaf Shuler
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/mlx5: remove red
Ack except one minor question below.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:35 AM
> To: Shahaf Shuler
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] net/mlx5: rename confusing object in probe
> code
>
> There are several a
-Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 12:03:45 +0530
> From: Hemant Agrawal
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> CC: Sachin Saxena
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: change TLS model for ARMv8 and DPAA machine
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
>
> From: Sachin Saxena
>
> Random corruptions observe
-Original Message-
> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:11:54 -0700
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> To: "Wiles, Keith"
> Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Stephen Hemminger
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/5] eal: add rte_uuid support
>
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 17:15:04 +
> "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>
> >
-Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:54:58 +0530
> From: "Rao, Nikhil"
> To: Jerin Jacob
> CC: hemant.agra...@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org, narender.vang...@intel.com,
> abhinandan.guj...@intel.com, gage.e...@intel.com, nikhil@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] eventdev: event tx adapt
-Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:54:58 +0530
> From: "Rao, Nikhil"
> To: Jerin Jacob
> CC: hemant.agra...@nxp.com, dev@dpdk.org, narender.vang...@intel.com,
> abhinandan.guj...@intel.com, gage.e...@intel.com, nikhil@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] eventdev: event tx adapt
Hi Adrien,
The logic looks much more clear now with the split.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 12:35 AM
> To: Shahaf Shuler
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/mlx5: split PCI from generic probing code
>
Hi,
According to what I understand from:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/eventdevs/index.html
only 3 drivers currently use the eventdev API,
NXP DPAA,NXP DPAA2 and Octeon SSOVF.
My question is: is there any HW requirements from a NIC
so that it will use the eventdev API for RX/TX instead
of the tradit
-Original Message-
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 05:02:01 +0300
> From: Kevin Wilson
> To: dev@dpdk.org, jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: Is there any HW requirement for a NIC to use the eventdev API for
> implementing Rx/Tx?
>
> Hi,
> According to what I understand from:
> http://dp
2018-06-08 21:17 GMT+02:00 Ferruh Yigit :
> On 6/7/2018 10:43 AM, Michal Krawczyk wrote:
>> ENA PMD is required to use librte_timer. The appropriate depndency must
>> be added ifin case the DPDK will be built as shared library.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Krawczyk
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ena/Makefi
Hi Ori,
Should we understand this proposal is nacked by [1] you have also
proposed?
If yes, answer to this one with a self-nack to make it clear.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:48:28PM +0300, Ori Kam wrote:
> This RFC contain proposal to add generic support for tunnel
> encapsulation/decaps
13 matches
Mail list logo
