The corrupted code used wrongly snprintf return value as the
number of characters actually copied, in spite of the meanning
is the number of characters which would be generated for the
given input.
It caused to remain zerod bytes between the failsafe command line
non sub device parameters indicate
Member attendees:
- Bruce Richardson
- Hemant Agrawal
- Jan Blunck
- Jerin Jacob
- Konstantin Ananyev
- Stephen Hemminger
- Yuanhan Liu
- How we want the developers to use the github.com/dpdk? Do we want to
get pull requests also from github?
We only want to maintain it as a mirror for dpdk. No
Hi All,
The next meeting of the tech board will happen on IRC #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC,
on 29th of August(Tuesday)
Agenda:
1) Discussion on next tree requests
a) Next tree for IPSec offload and maintainership
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-August/072995.html
b) Next tree for cli
http://dpd
-Original Message-
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 06:05:25 +
> From: Shahaf Shuler
> To: Jerin Jacob
> CC: "dev@dpdk.org"
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4] ethdev new offloads API
>
> Friday, August 25, 2017 1:32 PM, Jerin Jacob:
> > >
> > > The new API does not have an equivalent
Hi Tiwei,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:19:39AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
This patch adaptively batches the small guest memory copies.
By batching the small copies, the efficiency of executing the
memory LOAD instructions can be improved greatly, because the
memory LOAD latency can be effectively hid
5 matches
Mail list logo