Hi,
I had posted the following to the users mailing list a couple of days
ago, but there was no answer. My question contains references to the
DPDK source code, so I probably will not break the rules by
sending a copy to the dev mailing list.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:43:
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:41:37PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:18:04PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > I'm not opposed to default values, but it seems to me that if we are
> > splitting
> > out a configuration storage library from dpdk, part of the initzliation of
> > th
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:57:41AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> So heres attempt number 2 at a method for exporting PMD hardware support
> information. As we discussed previously, the consensus seems to be that pmd
> information should be:
>
> 1) Able to be interrogated on any ELF
3 matches
Mail list logo