[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: optimize rte_mbuf_refcnt_update

Hi Bruce, I'm Hanoch from Cisco Systems works for the https://github.com/cisco-system-traffic-generator/trex-core traffic generator project. While upgrading from DPDK 1.8 to 2.2 Ido found that the following commit creates a mbuf corruption and result in Tx hang commit f20b50b946da9070d21e3

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

Hi, I reported today an issue when using Pktgen-DPDK: https://github.com/pktgen/Pktgen-DPDK/issues/52 But I think it's more in DPDK than pktgen two identical machines with SFP+ DA cable between them DPDK 2.2.0 from tarball Pktgen-DPDK from git two identical machines: core i7 2600 (sandy bridge 4

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

On 12/27/15, 12:31 PM, "dev on behalf of Laurent GUERBY" wrote: >Hi, > >I reported today an issue when using Pktgen-DPDK: >https://github.com/pktgen/Pktgen-DPDK/issues/52 > >But I think it's more in DPDK than pktgen > >two identical machines with SFP+ DA cable between them >DPDK 2.2.0 from tarbal

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 19:43 +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > On 12/27/15, 12:31 PM, "dev on behalf of Laurent GUERBY" dpdk.org on behalf of laurent at guerby.net> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I reported today an issue when using Pktgen-DPDK: > >https://github.com/pktgen/Pktgen-DPDK/issues/52 > > > >But I t

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

On 12/27/15, 2:09 PM, "Laurent GUERBY" wrote: >On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 19:43 +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> On 12/27/15, 12:31 PM, "dev on behalf of Laurent GUERBY" > dpdk.org on behalf of laurent at guerby.net> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >I reported today an issue when using Pktgen-DPDK: >> >https:

[dpdk-dev] bnx2x pmd performance expectations

I wouldn't consider myself an expert on this driver but while looking at some other things, I have noted that?RTE_PMD_BNX2X_TX_MAX_BURST is defined to be 1. ?This bursts single packets to bnx2x_tx_encap() but it looks like bnx2x_tx_encap() is far more capable than that. On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 14:52

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] app/test-pmd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 21:37:10 -0500 Zhihong Wang wrote: > Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd. > > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang > --- > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 19 +-- > app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 38 -- > app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 1 + > 3 fil

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l2fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 21:37:11 -0500 Zhihong Wang wrote: > Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd. > > Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang > --- > examples/l2fwd/main.c | 60 > +++ > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/examples/l2fwd/main.c b/e

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 22:58, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > > 2015-12-19 16:21, Wiles, Keith: > > > On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" > > > wrote: > > > >2015-12-19 02:16, Wiles, Keith: > > > >> On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thoma

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix examples build failure

2015-12-24 20:38, steeven lee: > 1. Fix examples build failure Please explain in the commit log what was the issue. > 2. make build as default output folder name It should be a separate patch. What is the benefit? Please give some example command lines. Thanks