[dpdk-dev] DPDK packet capture question

Hello, I am a newbie to DPDK. I'm making a packet capture program from the l3fwd sample application. When I tested my program in a virtual environment, it worked. But in a real world, it does not work correctly. In the virtual environment, there are 3 VMs. VM1 sends DNS packets to VM3 and VM3 also

[dpdk-dev] DPDK v2.0.0 has different rte_eal_pci_probe() behavior

On Jun 21, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Tom Barbette wrote: > Application call to rte_eal_pci_probe() is not needed anymore since DPDK 1.8. > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-September/005890.html > > You were not wrong before, it is just a change in DPDK. I came across the > same problem a few days

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/10] app/test: use struct ether_addr instead of a byte array cast

On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:34:50 -0700 Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > + static struct ether_addr src_mac = > + { { 0x00, 0xFF, 0xAA, 0xFF, 0xAA, 0xFF } }; > + static struct ether_addr dst_mac = > + { { 0x00, 0xAA, 0xFF, 0xAA, 0xFF, 0xAA } }; > Should have been const (in

[dpdk-dev] rte_lpm with larger nexthops or another method?

Hello, I have gone out on the internet for days looking at a bunch of different radix tree implementations to see if I could figure a way to implement my own tree, just to work around the really low 255 CIDR block limitation in librte_lpm. Unfortunately every single one I could find falls into

[dpdk-dev] DPDK packet capture question

On Jun 21, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Daeyoung Kim wrote: > I am a newbie to DPDK. Welcome! > I'm making a packet capture program from the l3fwd > sample application. When I tested my program in a virtual environment, it > worked. But in a real world, it does not work correctly. This topology is kind of