Neil
On 5/3/15, 2:00 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:10:11PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/1/15, 1:48 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrot
On 5/1/15, 10:56 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
>primary DPDK site. http://github.com
Here is a good page showing the GitHub features:
https://github.com/features/
>
>I believe the DPDK community can benefit
Thomas:
Would review this patch this week.
On 4/28/2015 10:36 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Huawei, Changchun,
> Any opinion about these patches?
>
> 2015-04-16 14:48, Pavel Boldin:
>> This patchset contains refactoring steps for the `eventfd_link' module
>> of the DPDK's `librte_vhost' part.
>>
>>
Vring enqueue need consider the 2 cases:
1. Vring descriptors chained together, the first one is for virtio header, the
rest are for real data;
2. Only one descriptor, virtio header and real data share one single
descriptor;
So does vring dequeue.
Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang
---
lib/lib
On 2015-05-01 17:56, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
> [...]
While I'm really mostly a DPDK outsider, I'd like to express my support
for this suggestion. For my part, I'm mostly interested in the g
Minor fix for the referring of a pointer when debug and dump is enabled.
The original commit is: 72ec8d77
Signed-off-by: Changchun Ouyang
---
examples/vhost/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/examples/vhost/main.c b/examples/vhost/main.c
index 195d82f..8ce
Hi Sergio,
On 04/15/2015 11:30 AM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> This patch introduces a new LDLIBS variable to be set per library.
> Its purpose is to especify the library's dependent libraries to
> be explicitly linked against.
>
> Given the circular dependencies between eal, malloc, mempool
Hi Bruce,
On 04/23/2015 03:03 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> A large number of our header files and libraries are dependent on one
> another,
> which can lead to problems with circular dependencies if trying to tie some of
> those libraries together, e.g. when prototyping with pktdev, or other sc
Hello,
On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the
>> compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will not be used as the code is not
>> linked. A strange error a
Hi Chia
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Shelton Chia
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 11:19 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix igb and ixgbe kni ethtool get_link op
>
> igb and ixgbe's link detected always return yes
On 04/05/15 08:52, Simon Ka*gstro"m wrote:
> On 2015-05-01 17:56, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
>> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
>> [...]
> While I'm really mostly a DPDK outsider, I'd like to express my support
> for this su
Hi Keith,
On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use
> the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of the code.
>
> Added a new variable called EXTRA_LDLIBS to be
Hi Cyril,
On 04/29/2015 06:15 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> This series contains a few improvements that allow the DPDK code base to build
> properly on machines that enforce strict pointer cast alignment constraints.
>
> When dealing with packet data which could be arbitrarily aligned, we get t
On 5/2/2015 1:19 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> - GitHub manages the patches via pull requests and can be easily seen
>>> via a web browser.
>>> - The down side is you do have to use a web browser to do some work, but
>>> the
Hi!
I'm trying to do a out-of-tree build of DPDK 2.0.0 (with make -C and
O=), but failing with errors such as
In file included from
[...]/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h:40:0,
[...]
rte_malloc_heap.h:39:26: fatal error: rte_spinlock.h: No such file or
directory
Looking in
On 5/2/2015 1:33 AM, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make reviewing
>> patches
>> faster. In fact, I would assert that it slows the process down, as it
>> prevents
>> quick, easy command
Hi Simon,
On 05/04/2015 02:42 PM, Simon K?gstr?m wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to do a out-of-tree build of DPDK 2.0.0 (with make -C and
> O=), but failing with errors such as
>
> In file included from
> [...]/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal_memconfig.h:40:0,
> [...]
> rte_malloc_heap.
On 2015-05-04 14:48, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 05/04/2015 02:42 PM, Simon K?gstr?m wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm trying to do a out-of-tree build of DPDK 2.0.0 (with make -C and
>> O=), but failing with errors such as
>>
>> In file included from
>> [...]/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_
On 13/04/15 21:44, Keith Wiles wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a set of RFC patches to update DPDK to support a generic set of
> devices. The patches that follow create two files eal_common_device.h
> and rte_common_device.c and then a few items in rte_ethdev.[ch] were moved
> to cleanup those files
On 13/04/15 21:44, Keith Wiles wrote:
> Add the eal_common_device.c and rte_common_device.h and include the
> build support changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile| 1 +
> lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile| 1 +
>
On 5/4/15, 2:18 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>Hi Keith,
>
>On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
>> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
>> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use
>> the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of the code.
Hi Marc
On 5/4/15, 6:13 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>
>
>On 13/04/15 21:44, Keith Wiles wrote:
>> Add the eal_common_device.c and rte_common_device.h and include the
>> build support changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles
>> ---
>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile| 1 +
>>
On 5/4/15, 1:37 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the
>>> compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will no
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 4, 2015, at 2:19 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>
> Hi Keith,
>
>> On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
>> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
>> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use
>> the same style as LDLIBS-y
On 05/04/2015 04:36 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/15, 2:18 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
>>> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
>>> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use
>>>
From: James Davidson
Add support for 82583V (E1000) PCI device id.
Signed-off-by: James Davidson
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h
b/lib/libr
On 05/04/2015 05:09 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 4, 2015, at 2:19 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>>> On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
>>> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code
>>> more readable and maintainable by m
On 05/04/2015 04:49 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/15, 1:37 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>>>
Hi All,
I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a wa
On 5/4/15, 8:42 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>
>
>On 05/04/2015 04:49 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/4/15, 1:37 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
> Hi All,
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 4, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 05/04/2015 04:36 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 5/4/15, 2:18 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 4, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 05/04/2015 05:09 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On May 4, 2015, at 2:19 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Keith,
>>>
On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote:
Tryi
On Mon, 4 May 2015 11:50:09 +0200
Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> On 04/29/2015 06:15 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> > This series contains a few improvements that allow the DPDK code
> > base to build properly on machines that enforce strict pointer cast
> > alignment constraints.
> >
> >
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread mode
> is important for patch review.
Like many UNIX people, I use mutt.
My concern is that, if we're making the widespread adoption, usage, and
contributions for D
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:48:57AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> > What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread mode
> > is important for patch review.
>
> Like many UNIX people, I use mutt.
>
> My concern is th
On 01/05/15 20:17, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
> On 5/1/15, 1:09 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 1 May 2015 15:56:32 +
>> "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the
>>> primary DPDK site. http://github.com
On 02/05/15 15:59, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
> On 5/2/15, 6:40 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:36:58PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:59:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Projects like GCC, GLIBC, binutils, busybox, etc or what?
A.
>>
Due to commit c0371da6 in kernel 3.19, which removed msg_iov
and msg_iovlen from struct msghdr, DPDK would not build.
This patch makes use of struct iov_iter, which has references
to those two variables.
Reported-by: Thomas Monjalon
Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/
> On May 4, 2015, at 10:12 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/4/15, 10:48 AM, "Matthew Hall" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
>>> What mail client do you use? I think mail client supporting thread mode
>>> is important for patch review.
>>
>> Like
38 matches
Mail list logo
