[dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/librte_vhost: qemu vhost-user support into DPDK vhost library

2014-09-16 Thread Xie, Huawei
Hi Haifeng: Might be in the release after 1.8. > -Original Message- > From: Linhaifeng [mailto:haifeng.lin at huawei.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 1:28 PM > To: Xie, Huawei; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/librte_vhost: qemu vhost-user support > into DPDK vh

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

2014-09-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
Hi Thomas, I'm just wondering what the expected timeline is for you starting to merge patches in for the 1.8 release? As you have probably seen, I have quite a number of outstanding patches submitted for mbufs, and I'm wonder when the "part 1" set, which by now has been pretty well reviewed and

[dpdk-dev] Valgrind and DPDK - does it work ?

2014-09-16 Thread Morten Jagd Christensen
Hi all, I am interested to hear if anyone here have had any luck running Valgrind on DPDK applications? I tried to use this some time ago, but Valgrind does not seem to work together with hugepages ? or I am doing something wrong ;-) I would like to hear form anyone having success or fai

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] distributor_app: code review comments implementation

2014-09-16 Thread reshmapa
From: Reshma Pattan * support provided for command-line option portmask. * removed -g option in make file * spacing adjustment in header files inclusion in main.c * removal of const +3 in delcarration of rte_mbuf inside output_buffer structure declaration Changes in V2:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] distributor_app: new sample application for distributor library

2014-09-16 Thread reshmapa
From: Reshma Pattan A new sample app that shows the usage of the distributor library. This app works as follows: *An RX thread runs which pulls packets from each ethernet port in turn and passes those packets to worker using a distributor component. *The workers take the packets in turn, and de

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] distributor_app: new sample app

2014-09-16 Thread reshmapa
From: Bruce Richardson A new sample app that shows the usage of the distributor library. This app works as follows: * An RX thread runs which pulls packets from each ethernet port in turn and passes those packets to worker using a distributor component. * The workers take the packets in turn,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] distributor_app: removed extra spaces

2014-09-16 Thread reshmapa
From: Reshma Pattan Changes in V2: Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan --- examples/distributor_app/main.c | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/distributor_app/main.c b/examples/distributor_app/main.c index fab8199..b064a3a 100644 --- a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] eal / bonding pmd cleanup

2014-09-16 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, David Marchand wrote: > This patchset reworks the bonding pmd so that we don't need to modify the > eal > for this pmd to work. > > Basically, the arguments parsed at bond_init are stored in the bond private > structure to be used at dev_configure time. > If no ar

[dpdk-dev] About RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS

2014-09-16 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi, 2014-08-21 10:04, Alejandro Lucero: > Documentation and header files describe stat_idx parameter for > rte_eth_dev_set_tx_queue_stats_mapping > and > rte_eth_dev_set_rx_queue_stats_mapping > as > The value must be in the range > [0, RTE_MAX_ETHPORT_QUEUE_STATS_MAPS - 1] This function should n

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

2014-09-16 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Bruce, 2014-09-16 11:18, Bruce Richardson: > I'm just wondering what the expected timeline is for you starting to merge > patches in for the 1.8 release? As you have > probably seen, I have quite a number of outstanding patches submitted for > mbufs, and I'm wonder when the "part 1" set, > w

[dpdk-dev] Patch merges for 1.8 release

2014-09-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:20 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: Patch merges for 1.8 release > > Hi Bruce, > > 2014-09-16 11:18, Bruce Richardson: > > I'm just wonde

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] mbuf: use macros only to access the mbuf metadata

2014-09-16 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
Hi Olivier, I agree that your suggested approach for application-dependent metadata makes sense, in fact the two approaches work in exactly the same way (packet metadata immediately after the regular mbuf), there is only a subtle difference, which is related to defining consistent DPDK usage gu

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] librte_pmd_packet: add PMD for AF_PACKET-based virtual devices

2014-09-16 Thread Neil Horman
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:05:23PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > Ping? Are there objections to this patch from mid-July? > > John > Thomas, Where are you on this? It seems like if you don't have any objections to this patch, it should go in, in ilght of the lack of further commentary. Neil

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/13] mbuf: use macros only to access the mbuf metadata

2014-09-16 Thread Ramia, Kannan Babu
I completely agree with Cristian here, instead of leaving to applications where to place their meta data, we can provide a guidance by having this field about placement of application meta while maintaining transparency on the contents of application meta information. Regards Kannan Babu Ramia