Hi,
what's mean of q_errors in struct rte_eth_stats? The sum of q_errors equal
to ierrors?
when i test dpdk by test_pmd , the value of q_errors always is 0 but
ierrors is bigger.
in struct rte_eth_stats
uint64_t q_errors[RTE_ETHDEV_QUEUE_STAT_CNTRS]; /**< Total number of queue
packets rec
As a plan B (or C, or D, etc.) you could also try linking your primary process
against those same shared libraries, even if they are unused by it. Hopefully
that may have the same effect in the primary as in the secondary processes of
adjusting your address space region and allow things to get m
2014-04-07 13:57, Bruce Richardson:
> This reverts commit da6fd0759cbeb5fc14991a79e40105b9f6b99059.
>
> The use of cpuinfo to determine the frequency of the TSC is not
> advisable and leads to incorrect results when power management is
> in use. This is because, while the TSC frequency does not ch
Dear All
I have a setup with Intel 82576 DPDK NIC.
For one of the available DPDK ports i have created 8 VFs using igb_uio
based on steps presented in programmers guide. Some of them are attached to
VM, some maybe used on host
After some tests with l2fwd application i found out that it is not work
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz K
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:04 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] l2fwd not working on PF while working on VF
>
> Dear All
>
> I have a setup with Intel 82576 DPDK NIC.
> For one of the availab
Hi Bruce
Thanks for the tip. I changed VFs to 6 and now everything works ok on PF.
Thank You very much
Tomasz Kasowicz
2014-04-09 17:10 GMT+02:00 Richardson, Bruce :
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz K
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 0
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Didier Pallard
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 2:30 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ixgbe: release software locked semaphores on
initialization
It may happen that DPDK application gets killed
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Didier Pallard
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 2:30 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] igb: release software locked semaphores on
initialization
It may happen that DPDK application gets killed w
* Richardson, Bruce (bruce.richardson at intel.com) wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz K
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:04 PM
> > To: dev
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] l2fwd not working on PF while working on VF
> >
> > Dear Al
> It may happen that DPDK application gets killed while having acquired locks
> on the ethernet hardware, causing these locks to be never released. On next
> restart of the application, DPDK skip those ports because it can not
> acquire the lock, this may cause some ports (or even complete board if
> It may happen that DPDK application gets killed while having acquired locks
> on the ethernet hardware, causing these locks to be never released. On next
> restart of the application, DPDK skip those ports because it can not
> acquire the lock, this may cause some ports (or even complete board if
Hey all-
I was going to include this as an addendum to the packaging thread on
this list, but I can't seem to find it in my inbox, so forgive me starting a new
one.
I wanted to broach the subject of ABI/API stability on the list here.
Given the recent great efforts to make dpdk pac
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:39:52 -0400
Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey all-
> I was going to include this as an addendum to the packaging thread on
> this list, but I can't seem to find it in my inbox, so forgive me starting a
> new
> one.
>
> I wanted to broach the subject of ABI/API stability
13 matches
Mail list logo
